The death of talk radio
Talk radio was on a roll. Media execs loved it, politicians feared it. Some even credited
it with re-energizing American democracy. What happened?
by Dan Kennedy
The cover of Time magazine for January 23, 1995, was graced, if that's
the word for it, with a photo of Rush Limbaugh, combat-readiness etched in his
features, a plume of cigar smoke wafting upward from his most valuable asset:
his mouth. The cover line -- IS RUSH LIMBAUGH GOOD FOR AMERICA? -- was answered
by the subhead inside: "The explosion of radio call-in shows has created a new
form of electronic populism and demagoguery."
Talk radio was triumphant. The freshmen House Republicans made Limbaugh an
honorary member of Congress. Talk-radio targets such as Joycelyn Elders, Tom
Foley, and Dan Rostenkowski were gone. And the media and political
establishments were reeling, with Bill Clinton complaining about the medium's
"personal, demeaning attacks," and the Washington Post weighing in with
a page-one piece headlined THE POLITICS OF HATE the morning before the 1994
election.
Little more than two years later, the mediascape has changed utterly. Talk
radio, hailed as a new, populist force by firebrands ranging from Ralph Nader
to Newt Gingrich, has gone soft, with political agitation giving way to
entertainment.
Boston was arguably the hottest talk-radio market in the country during the
1970s and '80s, a place where hosts such as Jerry Williams and Gene Burns
demonstrated years before Limbaugh that an agitated, plugged-in populace could
shape the political conversation. Indeed, with the Republican Party virtually
having ceased to exist in 1980s Massachusetts, talk radio was, in some ways,
the sole opposition. "We were on talk radio all over the state," recalls
Barbara Anderson, executive director of Citizens for Limited Taxation and
Government, who credits the medium for the passage of Proposition
21/2, a 1980 ballot question that slashed property taxes.
Now the local airwaves are filled with the likes of Dr. Laura Schlessinger, a
nationally syndicated shrink, and Two Chicks Dishing, a local show that
revels in gossip and trivia. And Anderson has been virtually shut out of the
major stations. These days, she says, the only way she can reach people over
the airwaves is to book herself onto small stations in outlying areas.
"I wouldn't call it the demise of democracy," Anderson says, "but it's a
crying shame."
Granted, it's tempting to say good riddance to political talk. Steve Rendall,
who follows talk radio for the leftist media-watch group Fairness &
Accuracy in Reporting (FAIR), calls the medium "three and a half decades of
white guys on the right railing against the women's movement, the civil-rights
movement, and just about any peace movement that you've got."
But as conservative and simplistic as many of the political talk shows were,
they taught their lower-middle-class and working-class listeners, folks not
accustomed to being taken seriously, an important lesson: that they could take
charge of their own lives and influence the political system. By contrast, the
new breed of talk shows encourages little more than cynical apathy.
More . . .
Dan Kennedy can be reached at dkennedy[a]phx.com.