The Reverend Eugene Rivers
Pastor of the Azusa Christian Community, in Dorchester, and co-founder of
the Ten Point Coalition, a group of black Boston ministers working for social
change.
If I had infinite power to transform Boston, the one thing I would
change would be the sense of dependency, the lack of a sense of self-reliance
in the black community. Connected to that would be a commitment to develop a
new, post-civil-rights conceptual framework for the black community in the
areas of philosophy, politics, program, and policy.
Why? Because ultimately the issues of race relations and diversity, in the
larger society and in Boston in particular, will stand or fall on the
leadership that the black community is able to bring to the new conversation on
race, which is required as we begin the dawn of the next century. We move
forward as the black community and black political leadership transcend the
obsolete ideological category of race-relations liberalism and develop a much
more strategic and pragmatic vision.
The black church will inadvertently inherit the role of becoming the
provisional government of the black community in Boston and across the country.
With the decline of the affirmative welfare state, black churches are going to
be thrust into leadership roles which will be the equivalent of progressive
churches in Third World countries, where there never was a welfare state.
One positive sign is the relationship between the black community and the
Boston Police Department. In a city that gave us the busing crisis and the race
wars of the '70s and Charles Stuart in the late '80s, the level of cooperation
that exists between the black clerical leadership of this city and the Boston
Police Department is nothing short of a virtual miracle.
Amazingly, this intellectual-academic capital is the same place where we have
some of the poorest public schools. How does one explain the fact that even
with Harvard, MIT, and a host of other major academic institutions, we have
produced such a mediocre public school system? We've got the best and the
brightest, and some of the worst, when it comes to education. They have to be
brought together. If there are no free lunches for welfare mothers in
Dorchester, there should not be free lunches for Neil Rudenstine and his
counterpart at MIT in terms of the public good. I believe that the universities
could play a greater role in heightening the quality of education in the city
by co-sponsoring, with neighborhoods, academic programs that run year-round.
That's one concrete thing they could do.
We must learn to celebrate diversity while understanding the limits of
diversity, and recognize that not everyone is politically or constitutionally
obligated to like everybody. See, there is a kind of touchy-feely vision in
certain liberal circles that everybody should like everybody. Well, one, it's
not going to happen. Two, it's not politically necessary. And, three, I can
respect difference without necessarily being obligated to endorse it.