Finishing school
The New Hampshire seminar to take when you absolutely, positively need to kill someone tomorrow
by Chris Wright
Thanks to the Second Amendment, it is legal to own a handgun in America.
Depending on the circumstances, it's legal to kill someone with it. And whether
or not you own a gun, it is perfectly legal to attend a class that will show
you how to kill someone with a gun and stay out of jail. You might not find the
class right away -- I mean, they don't teach this stuff at the Cambridge Center
for Adult Education -- but it's out there. Somewhere.
Though there's no shortage of firearms in the US -- 240 million of them
at last count -- there is a remarkably small number of places that teach you
what to do with them. In a country that requires training for everything from
driving a car to practicing CPR, you can generally acquire a gun before you
know which end the bullets go in.
If you pore through one of the country's many glossy gun mags -- Guns and
Ammo, American Gunner, Gun Digest, Gun World -- you
will find instructors willing to teach you how to hit a target, and courses
that purport to integrate that skill into self-defense techniques. More serious
are the handful of genuine firearms academies in America: Defense Training
International in Laport, Colorado; the Gunsite Training Center in Paulden,
Arizona; the Smith & Wesson Academy in Springfield, Massachusetts; Thunder
Ranch in Mountain Home, Texas; and Yavapai Firearms Academy in Prescott Valley,
Arizona.
And then there is the Lethal Force Institute.
Situated an hour north of Boston, in Dunbarton, New Hampshire, the Lethal
Force Institute is widely considered to be the most intense education of its
kind in the country, if not the world. For $600, a licensed gun owner with a
clean criminal record can take the starter course, LFI-I, an intensive four-day, 40-hour seminar that reveals not only how to shoot and,
possibly, kill an assailant -- but also how to stay out of jail when that
happens, and how to handle the emotional aftermath of having pulled the
trigger. It's an all-around education -- a finishing school in the truest sense
of the words.
Those who graduate from LFI-I can take LFI-II, which teaches the fine art of machine-gun combat. The highest-level course, LFI-
III, shows you how to fire from a moving vehicle.
For people who own guns, LFI makes perfect sense: if you own a gun, you should
know how to use it, and if you use it you should know how to minimize the
fallout. Shooting to kill and then defending yourself in court is the logical
extension of the abstract piece of writing called the Second Amendment. In
America's insanely complex relationship with its firearms, LFI is the place
where the rubber meets the road.
Not everyone, of course, is comfortable that it exists. "I would like to see
exactly what they do up there," says John Rosenthal, founder of the
Boston-based Stop Handgun Violence.
I'd had pretty much the same reaction when I stumbled across LFI's Web site a
few weeks earlier. The words "Lethal" and "New Hampshire" immediately caught my
eye, calling to mind the image of a band of grubby survivalists just slightly
overcommitted to the principle "Live Free or Die." I was afraid, but I was also
curious. I called the number, vowing to hang up if someone named Jebediah
answered. Instead I got a courteous, competent-sounding guy named Massad
Ayoob.
The Lethal Force Institute pretty much is Massad Ayoob. A 27-year
police veteran, Ayoob began by training fellow cops in self-defense in the
early '70s, branching out into the civilian realm 19 years ago. At first I was
worried that Ayoob might not like to have a representative of the liberal media
snooping around in his business. But you get the sense that Ayoob has dealt
with worse things than reporters. In fact, he was much more than civil: he
invited me up to take the course, spotted me the tuition, and agreed to lend me
a gun.
Stand aside, Bruce Willis. Watch your back, Arnold. There's a new kid in
town. And his name is . . . Easy, easy.
"I do not teach bullshit, son," says Ayoob.
In any case, my dreams of superheroism dwindle pretty quickly when, one chilly
November morning, I find myself standing in the parking lot of the Pioneer
Sportsmen's Range in Dunbarton, New Hampshire, staring at a sign that says:
PARK AT YOUR OWN RISK. Signs like this take on new meaning when you're aware
that hundreds of rounds of live ammunition are being fired nearby. They become
less warnings than omens.
As I stand and ponder this, another vehicle pulls in to the lot. A truck. Out
of the truck steps a large, shaven-headed guy sporting a mustache. Or maybe
he's not so large; maybe his hunting regalia adds to his stature. Either way:
Oh, jeez. We strike up a conversation: the guy's name is David. He
mumbles something about "drug gangs" and offers me a cup of coffee. I
decline.
Turns out, David's a registered nurse from Syracuse -- a really nice,
soft-spoken guy. Judge not, I think to myself. But it's difficult not to, not
when you know you're about to be surrounded by armed citizens, alone, in the
middle of the wilderness.
While David and I shoot the breeze -- I mean, chat -- other students arrive in
a steady trickle. None of them looks particularly menacing. But for the fact
that we're convened in the parking lot of a shooting club, we could be people
standing in a checkout line at Wal-Mart. Villains of America, take note: a
potential predator -- the gun-toting citizen -- looks an awful lot like prey.
And this is, of course, why these people are here. Hell, I'm tempted to
mug a couple of them. Which wouldn't be such a good idea. The guy with the
white beard and intense eyes, the guy who weighs about 300 pounds, the
bespectacled woman who's fussing over having forgotten her warm coat, the
bearded beanpole who looks like he couldn't fight his way out of a wet paper
bag -- there's one thing that unites them: they're armed.
Even so, there's very little evidence of a he-man attitude in the people I
talk to. Roberta, a coffee-shop manager from Martha's Vineyard, bought a
handgun to "take control" of her own life. "I pray to God nothing ever
happens," she says. "I shy away from those
kill-'em-all-and-let-God-sort-'em-out people. They belong with the thugs on the
other side."
There is one chap, a cloth-capped, jowly sixtysomething from the Midwest, who
worries me a little. He refuses to talk on the record, but does take the time
to explain his solution to the crime problem in Washington, DC: give "them" as
many guns as they need, then move in with dump trucks the next day to clean up
the mess.
But this guy's the exception. Most of the people at LFI seem to be here to
alleviate a sense of vulnerability. Lenny, a psychiatrist from Maine, puts it
bluntly: "Evil exists, and I want to be able to survive it."
Suddenly a car pulls in and a little buzz of recognition goes around the lot;
people stop rummaging through their bags, sipping their cups of coffee, rubbing
hands against the cold. "There he is," someone whispers. It's Massad Ayoob.
The 51-year-old Ayoob is something of a celebrity in the gun community. In
1980, he published In the Gravest Extreme, a book that quickly came to
be known as the definitive study on the tactical, legal, and ethical issues
surrounding the use of lethal force by civilians. Twenty years after its
publication, the book has sold about 300,000 copies.
In all, Ayoob has written a dozen books -- The Truth About
Self-Protection, Stressfire, Hit the White Part -- plus
countless articles for gun periodicals. He has been an expert witness in about
70 criminal trials. He has taught in Switzerland and South America, England and
Africa. He has been featured in the Los Angeles Times, the New York
Times, and the National Enquirer. He has appeared on
Frontline, 20/20, and the Today show.
"He's a celebrity among thinking gun owners," says Miami
criminal-defense lawyer Jeffrey Weiner, former president of the National
Association of Criminal Lawyers and an LFI grad. "He's not a celebrity among
macho types."
At first glance, Ayoob certainly looks like the macho type. Though not what
you'd call a big guy, he nonetheless cuts an imposing figure: dark hair,
aviator glasses, mustache, black leather jacket, black T-shirt,
black flak trousers, boots. He has an unmistakable don't-mess-with-me air. His
body language barks authority.
Ayoob leads us into a drafty hunting lodge -- or what a hunting lodge might
look like if a cash-strapped school district built it. It has wood-paneled
walls, a coffee machine, bulletins pinned to the walls. At the front of the
room there's a table and a chalkboard, which is faced by a few rows of
straight-backed chairs. When you add 18 students and one instructor to the mix,
the cat-swinging potential of the room is pretty much nil.
Of the 18 students taking the course, two are women. There is a doctor, a
sales manager, a computer programmer, an animal-control officer. And then
there's me: a journalist, not the most beloved profession among members of the
gun community. Ayoob has me stand and introduce myself to the class, which
elicits a silent groan -- and a not-so-silent challenge from a guy who wants to
know if I'm here to write a "snide" story. Not for the first time, it occurs to
me that I'm probably the only unarmed person in the room.
"I'm here to stop the 18 of you from shooting your asses off," Ayoob says by
way of introduction. The students titter at this, but fall silent when he
bellows: "No one has ever taken a bullet at LFI. Now you're not going to fuck
that up for me -- ARE YOU?!"
What about my ass? I want to ask.
As Stop Handgun Violence's John Rosenthal puts it, "Ayoob says he's training
law-abiding citizens. But he could be training a law-abiding citizen who is
planning a mass shooting. There are 900 new felons every year. There have been
eight mass shootings in seven months, many by people without criminal records
in the past."
In the wrong hands, what we're learning at LFI -- crudely put, how to kill and
get away with it -- is nothing less than a public menace. Ayoob is aware of
this; indeed, much of the stuff he teaches at LFI he won't put in his books. "I
will not write a recipe to commit murder," is the way he puts it.
In the 18 years since LFI's inception, about 1000 civilians a year have taken
the course, and Ayoob doesn't particularly want to graduate felons. So he
maintains "a rigid screening process" for prospective students. "I can control
who comes here," he says.
"The people I call the strange rangers," he tells me, "know this is not a
place for them. I do get the occasional person on the phone. I explain that
this is probably not going to work out."
You probably have a better chance of being stabbed with a pencil at LFI than
being shot. There's an awful lot of theory. Indeed, the next four days are more
like being a cast member of The Paper Chase than of Die Hard.
Here is the first thing you learn: keep good notes. If you ever end up
shooting someone, you will find yourself in court trying to demonstrate
"reasonable mind set," and good, clean notes from LFI will be evidence in your
favor. Ayoob even suggests that we seal the notes, send them to ourselves by
registered mail, then store them in a safe-deposit box.
"Don't draw skulls and crossbones in the margins," he says. "Don't write
things like `Kill them all and let God sort them out.' "
Here's the next thing you learn: every American has a license to kill. "It's
called justifiable homicide." The question is, when is killing someone deemed
justifiable by society?
Not often. Justifiable homicide is the only aspect of American justice where
the burden of proof is on the defendant. The only certainty is this: "Expect to
be arrested."
"You can shoot Charlie Manson raping a nun," Ayoob says, "and you'll end up in
court."
Considering the grim subject matter, Ayoob's lectures can be pretty funny.
Like all good educators, he's a bit of a performer ("I'm a ham," he admits).
When demonstrating how a villain can come across as an injured party, Ayoob
adopts the character of a generic thug named Mungo: "Dur, oi wuz just moinding
moi own bizniss," says the slack-jawed Mungo/Ayoob.
To avoid becoming the Bride of Mungo -- Ayoob's euphemism for going to prison
-- the shooter must prove immediate and otherwise unavoidable danger of death
or grave bodily harm to the innocent. And if you do end up in the dock,
don't lie.
"There's a saying," says Ayoob. "If you suck one cock, you're a cocksucker
forever. Well, if you tell one lie in court, you're a liar forever. That
sucking noise you hear will be your freedom going down the toilet."
There's a palpable silence. Ayoob's language does tend to be colorful, but
that "cocksucker" bit seems to have caught a few class members off guard.
Ayoob notices this. "If you raise your eyebrows at the word `motherfucker,'
you'll have trouble coming to terms with the psychology of violence," he says.
"It's grief, it's suffering. I will not say `vomitus' instead of `puke.' This
is ugly stuff."
Then he adds, "If my language offends, I apologize. Mea fucking culpa."
Following another burst of laughter, Ayoob's deadly serious again. "There are
no first-place winners in a shooting situation," he warns us. "When it's over,
believe me, you haven't won. Deterrence is the only victory."
In many ways, LFI isn't a class in killing people. It's a class in not
killing them. Ayoob finds himself in the curious position of believing the best
way to prevent gun violence is to teach people how to commit it. His entire
lethal-force philosophy hinges on a single principle: the more prepared you are
to kill an assailant, the less likely you are to have to.
This may sound a bit nutty at first, but perhaps the only way to get to the
heart of a matter as complex as gun ownership is through paradox. In an issue
that many people view in black-and-white terms, Ayoob's
pacifism-through-violence philosophy has made him as many enemies as it has
friends.
"I've found myself caught in the middle of a very polarized debate," he says.
"On one side I've got the hard-core anti-gunners. To them I'm a crypto-fascist
because I tell women that if a rapist attacks you, killing the son of a bitch
is absolutely one of your options -- legally and morally. On the other side
there's the hard-core right-wing ultra-
gunnies, who consider me a crypto-commie because I tell them, `No, as a matter
of fact, you don't have a God-given right to carry a loaded gun in shopping
malls where there are kids walking around. It's a privilege, and you need to be
able show society that you know how to use it and when to use it. That you're
not going to shoot at a perpetrator and hit a kid by mistake.' I think that's a
reasonable request.
"In the history of polarized debates," he adds, "anybody in the middle find
himself in a very lonely place."
It's clear from the outset why Ayoob wouldn't have many friends in the
anti-gun world, and it quickly becomes clear why the pro-gun people might be
uncomfortable too. For one thing, he doesn't make vigilantism sound like much
fun.
If you do shoot an attacker, he warns, a typical legal defense will cost
upwards of six figures. And the ordeal doesn't end with financial ruin. Kill
someone, and your friends and neighbors will instinctively turn their backs on
you. "The newspapers are not going to write GOOD GUYS ONE, SCUMBAGS NIL," Ayoob
says, "but MAN HELD IN SLAYING. Society doesn't say, `You put this beast in the
dirt where he belonged.' Society will make you feel like a murderer. You
killed a citizen."
Then there's the psychological trauma. The first thing you'll feel after
having shot someone is euphoria -- "not because you killed, but because you
survived." When this wears off, you'll enter into a downward spiral: sleep
disturbance, appetite disturbance, substance abuse, sexual dysfunction, social
withdrawal, depression, maybe even suicidal tendencies.
"Some say that you'll feel warm and fuzzy," Ayoob says. "Your beer will be
colder, your jokes will be funnier, your dick will be four inches longer." He
pauses, then shouts: "No! You may have killed the archetype of the beast, but
you have committed an unnatural act!"
You can tell that some students are getting a bit disheartened by all this
damned-if-you-do, dead-if-you-don't stuff. Indeed, there's a touch of
after-class grumbling. "I'm a little discouraged," says one man, a 69-year-old
psychiatrist. "It's troubling to know the ocean of doo-doo you get into if you
have to defend yourself, no matter how well judged the response."
Still, all this is better than the alternative: "There is no reversal from the
grave," says Ayoob, "no appeal from the wheelchair." Shooting might be the last
resort of the last resort, but it's something we have to learn how to do.
Yeah? Then how come we haven't done any shooting yet?
Tomorrow, Ayoob assures me. "Tomorrow we'll shoot until we barf."
The next day Ayoob takes us out onto the firing range. I am given a Smith &
Wesson .38 Special revolver. I've never held a gun before, let alone fired one,
and having the thing in my hand gives me the jitters. I grasp it as if it were
trying to escape, gripping so hard my knuckles seem about to pop through the
skin. I hold in my hand the power over life and death. Like an avenging angel.
A god.
And that's before they've given us any bullets.
First we have to go through some drills. We learn a few stances: the Chapman,
the Weaver, the Isosceles. We learn the Ayoob wedge grip, speed-loading
techniques. We learn how to shoot from kneeling positions, one-handed,
weak-handed. We learn how to focus on the front sight of the gun. Then we're
finally ready for the live ammo. We load (steady, steady), aim (steady,
steady), and . . . BANG!
Firing a gun for the first time can only be described as ouch. Even
though my gun has what is known as "mouse-fart recoil," it delivers a sensation
that falls somewhere between painful whap and electric shock. And, of course,
there's a big noise. The gun, however, hasn't flown out of my hand, I haven't
ended up flat on my back, and no one's dead. I'm heartened by this. So, eyes
closed (a big no-no, by the way), I throttle the trigger again.
By the time we're finished, we've each fired about a hundred shots. Amazingly,
almost all my bullets went somewhere near the target. "You're a natural," says
Ayoob, and my fellow LFIers clap. Even though the crook between thumb and
finger of my shooting hand feels as if someone's been at it with a pair of
pliers, I'm itching for another go. But no, it's back to the class for more
book stuff.
"Never draw a gun with the intent to kill," says Ayoob. "But you must draw with
the willingness."
We're back to Ayoob's first principle of aggressive nonviolence: "The irony
is, if you're willing to kill a perpetrator, you probably won't have to."
There's something a little sinister, a little Will to Power-ish, in the
rituals one uses to establish control over another person through threat of
lethal force. "It's a lot more complicated than killing the son of a bitch,"
Ayoob says. "An amoeba can kill an amoeba. It's a far more complex thing to
intimidate."
The basics of confronting an assailant are: get attention, gain credibility,
intimidate, and render incapable of killing. Most of us have seen an armed
confrontation only by way of Hollywood or TV, and for us, there is this piece
of advice: don't yell, "Freeze, motherfucker!" ("These are people," says Ayoob,
"for whom `mother' is half a word.") There are things that should be said,
places the gun should be pointed.
"Stopping power is like real estate: location, location, location," Ayoob
explains. And stopping someone doesn't necessarily mean killing him. It means
shooting an attacker in whatever place most drastically affects his ability to
keep attacking. But I've said too much. There are some things that Ayoob
doesn't want me printing in the paper -- lest I give the bad guys ideas -- and
where to aim and shoot are among these things. Suffice it to say, the places
you point the gun are generally not places one would want to receive a bullet,
or even a sharp slap.
What I can print are a few more of Ayoob's key points: "Civilians
chasing criminals are like dogs chasing cars: they have no idea what to do with
them when they catch them." That is: if they run, let them go. If it's a
robbery, give them the money. If you're armed and someone comes up and spits in
your face, walk away. If you hear a noise in your house, hide yourself in a
safe room and call the police -- never go looking for intruders.
When in doubt, don't shoot.
"I can't believe I spent $600 for that ugly little Ay-rab to tell me I can't
shoot anyone," says Ayoob, with what sounds suspiciously like his Mungo
voice.
But hold on. I'm not planning on shooting anyone. I mean, who plans for
such contingencies -- where to put the bullet, what to say to "the archetype of
the beast," how to beat the murder rap? Every now and again the absurdity of
what we're learning here strikes home. We've been immersed in this stuff for
three days now, and that night, when I go back to my chilly, cruddy little
motel room, I can't sleep. I miss my wife. I miss warmth. I miss the absence of
death.
On Sunday morning, the last day of the course, we go out onto the range for the
final time, this time to get graded. It's snowing, and the wind has whipped up
a mini sand storm. But we've got to shoot -- we've no choice in the matter.
We'll be firing a total of 60 rounds, timed, from all the positions and grips
we've learned so far. Our LFI certificate hangs on our getting a good score.
"Weak hand! Load! Shoot! Back to the 15-yard line! Classic Weaver! Load!
Shoot!" This is what's known, quite rightly, as a "stress fire" drill.
As dozens -- hundreds -- of shots ring out, an acrid smell of sulfur fills the
air. Though we're all wearing ear protection, you can feel the gunfire on your
skin. And, if you concentrate, you can actually see the bullets: a thin swish
followed by a puff of sand from behind the target. When the dust settles, I
have scored 279 out of a possible 300 points, one of the highest scores in the
class. Like Ayoob said, I'm a natural. Another well-earned round of applause,
and it's off to the classroom for a final session.
We're to eat a late lunch while watching a videotape. Oh, goody. There's a
sort of carnival atmosphere in the room; people compare shooting scores and
munch gratefully on sandwiches. There's a lot of banter, laughter.
Then the video starts rolling.
It's a greatest-hits flick from some city morgue. Shooting victims. If we were
in any doubt as to the gulf between letting fly at a square of cardboard and at
a human being, the video makes it quite clear. With people, bullets don't just
go in one side and out the other. They do weird, terrible things. They spin,
shatter, tumble, spread, splatter. The video reveals ragged amputations,
fist-size holes, close-range wounds where the flesh has cooked, eyes blown out
of sockets, skulls imploded, guts exploded, brains mashed, rubber faces filled
with fluid. One guy lies face down on the slab, the back of his head blossoming
like a black flower. There are groans. A couple of people get up and leave the
room.
"If you can't face this," Ayoob says in the video's aftermath, "maybe you
shouldn't be carrying a firearm." And "this" is nothing more than the truth of
what a gun is. It's not a tool, not a piece of equipment. There is no veneer of
utility that can mask the hellishness of a gunshot wound to the mouth.
We've been sucker-punched. With a crash we come down from our target-range
high, while our lunches threaten to go in the opposite direction. It's a master
stroke on Ayoob's part. He has managed somehow to approximate the revulsion one
must feel after having put a bullet in someone.
But he's not letting us off the hook yet. "Go hunting. Hunt a deer and kill
it," he says. "There will be no more mating and raising fawns for the animal.
Its destiny now becomes your table. It's been sacrificed to satisfy your
needs." Ayoob is relentless. If we can't kill a deer, he asks, what makes us
think we can kill a human being?
"That made me sick," says Roberta later. "I didn't like seeing the autopsies,
but to think that I had to go out and kill something, it made me nauseous."
Then, Ayoob does a 180. "These days, I do most of my hunting with cameras," he
says. It's a very weird moment. Before we can fully absorb what he's getting
at, he puts on another videotape. "I never stick around for this," he says and
leaves the room. Jesus. Now what?
On the screen, Ayoob tells a story. When he was a teenager, his sister -- his
only sibling -- succumbed to Hodgkin's disease. She died in his arms. In the
aftermath of the death, Ayoob's mother suggested he go hunting, to take his
mind off things. After a few hours in the woods, he hadn't shot anything, and
he decided to call it a day. On the way back to his truck, though, Ayoob
spotted a young, plump, juicy deer. Hello, food, he thought as he
lowered his sights. He had the animal, had it, but he couldn't pull the
trigger. By now he was weeping. Something clicked. Something changed. He put
the gun down and shooed the animal away. "It was the last day of the hunting
season," he says. "He was going to live for another year."
I, for one, am dumbstruck. Not to mention exhausted, confused, and a little
depressed. Ayoob returns, taking his place at the front of the class. "If you
do not value life," he says, quietly, "you have no right to possess the power
to destroy it."
The Lethal Force Institute is kind of a crazy idea. Or at least a very American
idea. Nowhere else on earth is the ideal of armed self-defense etched so firmly
into the social contract. Every American has the license to kill. Ayoob's
relatives learned this when they came here from Damascus. For them, the right
to use lethal force has become something of a family curse.
Ayoob's grandfather, the owner of a jewelry store, once shot a robber dead.
His father, too, shot and killed a violent criminal. "I was born under the mark
of Cain," Ayoob says.
In his lifetime, Ayoob has had to pull a gun on people about 30 times.
"God help me," he says, "I haven't had to drop the hammer."
Chris Wright can be reached at cwright[a]phx.com.