YOU SAY YOU WANT A REVOLUTION
The article "Outrage Returns" [News and Features, December 29, 2000] suggested
that the anti-globalization protests represent the stirrings of a much bigger
movement for change in American politics. Alas, to borrow a phrase that was
first used to describe the Million Man March, the anti-IMF protests were "a
moment, not a movement." The protesters are a narrow band of American society
with a highly specialized and not terribly cohesive agenda.
You wrote that "people took to the streets with a passion and ferocity that
this country hadn't seen since the late 1960s." I heard the same about the
nuclear-freeze movement and the movement against American involvement in El
Salvador in the 1980s. It would be difficult to argue that either movement led
to the rebirth of a vital, politically active left in our country. Which brings
us to the Nader campaign. You wrote, "The protesters drew scores of
once-apathetic young people into the political process -- witness the strength
of Ralph Nader's presidential run." First of all, there is no evidence that
Nader energized anybody. Among all voters, 17 percent were between the ages of
18 and 29 -- the same as four years earlier. Second, this is the first time I
have heard winning less than three percent of the vote described as
"strength."
My last point of contention is with Professor Joseph Boskin, who said that
conservatives' "nasty policies will translate into greater activism." I heard
that theory about Ronald Reagan 20 years ago. Worked real well then, too.
Thaddeus Windt
Washington, DC
Although I do not agree with your portrayal of the RNC protests in Philadelphia
(I was living there at the time and it was quite a yawn), I certainly agree
that these protesters lack any cohesive statement. I was standing face to face
with several protesters and never once heard "Stop capitalism, globalism,
Republican conservatism" or any other such legitimate battle cry. All I heard
was, "We're going to shut this city down!" Should George Bush and his cohorts
attempt to revert to standard, conservative Republican practice, we will need
aggressive campaigners experienced in lobbying. Destroying the property of
innocent individuals is hardly the way to lead a protest, especially when
you're seeking to gain allies.
Diane Russell Natera
Portland, Maine
It's unfortunate that the Phoenix unhesitatingly repeated some of the corporate
media's standard lines, such as low-balling the participation in protests by as
much as 50 percent and referring rather condescendingly to "self-styled
anarchists." As for the "lack of a coherent message" -- most people in the
movement are for collective decision-making by autonomous groups of empowered
individuals and communities. Some call it anarchism, some direct democracy, but
almost all the major actions of the past year have been organized using the
consensus process.
CHECK OUT THE LIBRARIANS
I appreciate your publicizing the debate on Internet filtering at the Old South
Meetinghouse ["Free Speech," TJI, News and Features, December 29, 2000]. It is
an important issue for librarians and the public. What I do not appreciate is
the tired old stereotype of the unattractive, bun-wearing librarian in the
accompanying illustration by Timothy Walker. Were Mr. Walker to come into the
library where I work, he would see a staff as varied in age, gender, ethnic
background, and style of dress as the urban area we serve. Get with it, Mr.
Walker!
Pamela Barchat Colt
Cambridge Public Library
Cambridge
We welcome responses from our
readers. Letters should be typed (double-spaced) if possible, and must include
the writer's name, address, and a telephone number where he or she can be
reached during business hours for verification. The writer's name and position
or town will be published, but these may be withheld for good reason.
Letters may be mailed to the Boston Phoenix, 126 Brookline Avenue,
Boston, MA 02215; faxed to (617) 859-8201; or e-mailed
to letters[a]phx.com or to staff writers'
e-mail addresses (e-mailed
letters must include a telephone number for verification and a hometown). All
letters are subject to editing for considerations of space, fairness, and
clarity.