Balancing act
Too much of a good thing is bad for wine
Uncorked by Thor Iverson
Over the past few weeks, we've discussed a few of the individual components of
wine, such as
tannin,
acidity, and
taste.
Along with sweetness,
those characteristics can describe and categorize any
type of wine. But it's the harmony among those elements -- something called
balance -- that determines whether a wine is pleasurable to drink.
Balanced wines possess no rough edges or jarring notes. All the elements are
in sync, neither dominant nor undetectable. Flawed wines are pretty easy to
identify; certain qualities will virtually leap out of the glass, assaulting
the senses with an overwhelming sensation of
acidity,
tannin, or
oak. Overly
acidic wines
will taste sour, or even cause a slight burning sensation on the
tongue. Wines that are too old often exhibit this characteristic. Too much
tannin dries out the mouth
and shrivels the tongue, leaving a signature leather taste and little else. And then there's
oak.
Many, but not all, wines spend some part of their pre-bottling lives in
oak
barrels (steel and ceramic containers are common alternatives). The toasty,
slightly sweet character contributed by
oak aging is an integral part of most
wines. Proceeding from the assumption that if a little
oak is a good thing, a
lot of oak is better,
some producers have gone overboard by using smaller (or
more) oak barrels,
dumping oak chips in the wine,
or even adding liquid oak
essence. The result is wines that taste more like furniture than like grapes.
California and Australia used to be the prime offenders, but over-oaked wine is
now made everywhere. Thankfully, a small backlash is already under way. (Bias
alert: I have a strong personal aversion to over-oaked wines.)
Subtler imbalances can be difficult to detect, but they help indicate a wine's
ageability; its potential to develop into something extraordinary with a
few years (or decades) of proper storage. The ability to determine if that
potential exists despite apparent imbalances is what makes some wine critics,
like Robert Parker and Michael Broadbent, famous (at least among wine geeks),
but the skills they employ are mostly a matter of experience paired with a
little common sense.
For instance, many young reds are highly
tannic.
Since all other components fade in comparison with the
tannin,
it would be easy to taste one of these
wines and conclude that there's nothing else there. But pay close attention to
the finish
(the "aftertaste") -- both its character and its length -- and as
the tannic dryness fades the
fruit and
acidity will assert themselves. If
there's enough of both, the wine will age well. If the lingering impression is
still overwhelmingly bitter, the tannin
will outlast the fruit. Similarly, if a
wine tastes dead or flabby (like flat soda or room-temperature
milk), it lacks sufficient acidity
and will not age. Acidity can be measured by
a sharpness or tingle on the finish; a tart or sour taste might mean there's
too much. Oak should always be just
one of the tastes in a wine; if it dominates, the wine is over-oaked.
While balance is crucial in wines meant to age, it can sometimes be ignored
in wines designed to be consumed young (within a year or two of bottling). As
we've noted in previous columns, foods with high
acidity (like tomato sauce)
can "cancel out" acidity in wine, and strongly flavored meats or grilled foods
can help defeat
tannic dryness. Fruity wines with
little tannin or
acidity can
be extremely enjoyable with all types of cuisine. And personal preference for
tannic,
acidic,
or oaky wines is also a factor. But it's rare that an
unbalanced wine provides the kind of hedonistic pleasure of which great wine is
capable.
This week's recommendations all explore some facet of balance and how it
works in wine.
1996 Grandes Bodegas Marques de Velilla (Ribera del Duero) ($10.99). A
Spanish red with a thick boysenberry, chokecherry, pineapple, black pepper, and
wet leather nose. The sensation on the palate is one of licorice, wheat,
pepper, and rich dark berries, with a tannic and starchy finish. There's a
faint sourness to the finish, which suggests that this wine may have a bit more
acid
that it needs. Nevertheless, it will age a few years, and it goes with
just about everything but seafood.
1996 Muga Rioja ($12.99). A Spanish white that smells of apple pie,
lemon, and slate, with a palate of golden apples. Some lime-apple tartness on
the finish is a little bracing, but in combination with the tasty fruit and
moderate oak,
it creates a nice, light wine to accompany salads and white meats in thick sauces.
1987 Chateau Musar ($21.99). This Lebanese red wine is a story in
itself; some vintages
have gone to waste because no one would risk death to
pick grapes at harvest time. Despite the violence surrounding the vineyards,
it's one of the most compelling wines in the world, and it's built to age. This
one isn't quite mature, but if you air it out for an hour or so (in a decanter
or in your glass), a massive wave of cassis, cherry, strawberry, mushroom,
peach, basil, and tobacco issues forth. This wine demonstrates how fruit
emerges from early, tannic
beginnings in age-worthy wines. Serve with red meats
and earthy foods like mushrooms.
Thor Iverson can be reached at wine@phx.com.
The Uncorked archive