Boston's Alternative Source! image!
     
Feedback


[Film culture]

Oscar’s worst?
Mrs. Miniver makes Gladiator look golden

BY GERALD PEARY

Many mediocre movies have preceded Gladiator as the Academy’s Best Film, but Mrs. Miniver (1942), at the Harvard Film Archive on Monday as part of its “Film and the Third Reich” series, might take the booby prize as the most bloated and insufferable Oscar winner of them all. Who in our multicultural age can abide the moneyed Miniver family, whose picket-fence country living, with crude but adoring servants everywhere, is so sentimentalized? The first half-hour of this 134-minute opus finds dear Kay Miniver (patrician Greer Garson, another Oscar winner), already under a poofy feathered hat, buying another overpriced one and then fretting how to tell her husband. Not to worry! Pipe-puffing tweedy Clem (Walter Pidgeon) has plunked money down on a new roadster. Who is he to complain about his dear wife’s running up a shopping bill? Then War comes to the Minivers.

This sterling tale may take place in 1939 England, but it was Hollywood-shot on an MGM sound stage. It’s those nasty Germans, you see, so Clem and his villagers take their little boats down the river to rescue the British at Dunkirk. Meanwhile, Mrs. Miniver fights the war at home when a wounded Nazi flyer lands in her flowered back yard. Although she treats him politely, the uncivil fellow brags about how the Germans destroyed Rotterdam in two hours, killing thousands of women and children. Before turning him over to the police, Mrs. Miniver does the unthinkable: she slaps his impertinent face!

This was the movie that Winston Churchill endorsed for inspiring the British people, the one that Franklin Roosevelt wanted rushed into the theaters so Americans could understand why we were going to war in Europe. What kitsch! What hooey! The smug Miniver family having fresh-brewed coffee in their shelter as bombs explode outside! And that famous ending in a ruined English church in which the inspiration to fight World War II (Hitler’s “Jewish problem” is never mentioned) is a stiff-upper-lipped rendition of “Onward Christian Soldiers.”

FROM LA to Toronto to Austin, the e-mails have poured in from kindly film buffs responding to my plea for assistance in a recent “Film Culture” column. I’ve been tracking down film-critic characters in narrative movies for a documentary on American criticism. I offered my limited list and asked whether readers might remember more. Remember they did, from John Cusack’s critic ex-girlfriend (Joelle Carter) in High Fidelity to the knife-victim woman TV critic in the Clint Eastwood flick The Dead Pool (1988). A television watcher waxed on about a juicy 1995 episode of The Simpsons in which Springfield had a film festival and, causing Homer fits of jealousy, Marge invited to town as erudite judge and jury none other than Jay (“The Critic”) Sherman.

In my column, I made the ignoramus claim that only one movie ever has had a film critic as the protagonist, Woody Allen’s Play It Again, Sam (1972). Wrong. Readers pointed me to two other works, the straight-to-video Keys to Tulsa (1997) and the made-for-TV A Slight Case of Murder (1999). Keys to Tulsa posits the most unusual film version of a film critic in Eric Stoltz’s Boudreau Richter, because this spoiled, dissolute, womanizing, money-borrowing, cocaine-snorting, good ol’ young man doesn’t mention a single movie in the course of the film. He’s the reviewer for the Tulsa Register — lucky him!! — but I’m sorry to say that Richter has no interest whatsoever in cinema. His influential mom (Mary Tyler Moore) is pals with the editor, and that’s how he got the job, which he is screwing up by ignoring deadlines. “I’ll have a review ready first thing Monday morning,” he promises, but that’s as far as it goes. When he rubs up against an old flame (Deborah Unger), he mumbles to himself, “I guess I could write my review this afternoon.” That’s the last we hear about it until he’s fired.

A Slight Case of Murder, from a Donald Westlake story, is co-written by and stars William F. Macy, as a New York–based cable-movie critic. Terry Thorpe’s ambiance is more familiar: movie posters, a 16mm projector in his home, fetishized lectures he gives on his adored film noirs. He may be the protagonist but he’s hardly a hero. No film critic ever is. He admits to delivering vicious reviews, and as he confesses in an aside, he once fell asleep at a screening after drinking too much and “I had to fictionalize my review.” Slippery ethics also lead Thorpe to cover up his involvement in the accidental death of his mistress and ultimately to bludgeon the man who is blackmailing him. Not to mention seducing the long-legged bimbo wife of a detective friend during a nocturnal screening of Gaslight in his apartment.

Am I, a critic, insulted by these two portraits of my profession? They’re hopelessly negative, but at least Richter and Thorpe are scummy studs instead of the usual neutered nerds. The film critic as Superfly!

Gerald Peary can be reached at gpeary@world.std.com.

Issue Date: April 12-19, 2001