Powered by Google
Home
Listings
Editors' Picks
News
Music
Movies
Food
Life
Arts + Books
Rec Room
Moonsigns
- - - - - - - - - - - -
Personals
Adult Personals
Classifieds
Adult Classifieds
- - - - - - - - - - - -
stuff@night
FNX Radio
Band Guide
MassWeb Printing
- - - - - - - - - - - -
About Us
Contact Us
Advertise With Us
Work For Us
Newsletter
RSS Feeds
- - - - - - - - - - - -
Webmaster
Archives



sponsored links
- - - - - - - - - - - - -
PassionShop.com
Sex Toys - Adult  DVDs - Sexy  Lingerie


   
  E-Mail This Article to a Friend

ART BY NUMBERS
Amazon rule
BY CLEA SIMON

If we, the literate public, believe that information is empowering, then it stands to reason that we should applaud Amazon.com’s new "concordance" and "text-stat" features. These services, launched with no fanfare in early March, offer statistical analyses of books by measuring such elements as word repetition, average number of syllables per word, and words per sentence. These features (which seem to have been applied primarily to current works by contemporary authors — no Jane Austen, for instance — and Amazon isn’t saying why) also provide the "Fog Index," developed by one Robert Gunning, which is supposed to rate the difficulty of a text (a score between seven and eight is considered ideal) and the "Flesch-Kincaid Index," which purports to assign a grade level to the reading.

While the posting of "statistically improbable phrases" (actually a list of recurring word pairs) may give readers an idea of book content — "heartless bitch" pops up for one, "adoption lawyer" in another — the new feature caused a minor brouhaha among authors on Web sites such as Readerville.com. In the April 12 installment of her blog, Buzz, Balls & Hype, author M.J. Rose (whose fourth novel, Sheet Music, has a Fog of 6.9 and a Flesch-Kincaid of 5.1) expressed her mystification and polled her readers.

While several of those polled found the new measurements (which also measure words per ounce and words per dollar) amusing, only one — a schoolteacher — described them as having any real utility. (She checks it before recommending books to her students.) Author Caroline Leavitt (whose latest, Girls in Trouble, had a Fog of 6.2, Flesch-Kincaid of 4.5) uses Microsoft Tools’ calculator of the Flesch-Kincaid index in her freelance work editing educational material. "It’s wildly innacurate," she says. "Sometimes I’d take out an ‘and’ and a piece would go from eighth-grade to fourth-grade level." Laments Rose, "I had just gotten over my addiction to checking my Amazon sales rank when this comes along."


Issue Date: April 22 - 28, 2005
Back to the News & Features table of contents
  E-Mail This Article to a Friend
 









about the phoenix |  advertising info |  Webmaster |  work for us
Copyright © 2005 Phoenix Media/Communications Group