Powered by Google
Home
In This Issue
Listings
Editor's Picks
News & Features
- - - - - - - - - - - -
Art
Astrology
Books
Dance
Food & Drink
Gaming
Movies
Music
Television
Theater
- - - - - - - - - - - -
Classifieds Home
Adult
Adult Personals
Personals
- - - - - - - - - - - -
Letters
Webmaster
Archives
Education
RSS
Here's the new music you'll hear this week. Click on the track to buy from our iTunes store.
Franz Ferdinand - Do You Want To
Death Cab For Cutie - Soul Meets Body
Depeche Mode - Precious
Morningwood - Nth Degree
Alkaline Trio - Mercy Me

Entire playlist >>

sponsored link
- - - - - - - - - - - - -
sextoY.com
adult toys, movies  & more


Serving the reality-based community since 2002.

Notes and observations on the press, politics, culture, technology, and more. To sign up for e-mail delivery, click here. To send an e-mail to Dan Kennedy, click here. For bio, published work, and links to other blogs, visit www.dankennedy.net.

Wednesday, November 10, 2004

WATER, WATER EVERYWHERE. Media Log is supposed to be taking the day off. But I'm so outraged by this story in today's Boston Globe that I feel an overwhelming urge to link to it and scream incoherently. Sean Murphy and Raphael Lewis report that it could take 10 years to fix the leaks in the Big Dig - which, last time I checked, isn't even finished yet. Okay, all togther now: Aaaiiiyeee!!!

Serious question I: Attorney General Tom Reilly is reportedly involved in discussions aimed at filing a lawsuit against those responsible for this calamity. Does that mean Reilly is not contemplating a criminal investigation as well? If not, why not?

Serious question II: Is the I-93 tunnel really safe? What assurances do we have that the walls aren't going to burst loose while hundreds of cars are trapped inside during rush hour? For some reason, I do not find it reassuring that the folks at Bechtel/Parsons Brinckerhoff are telling us that the tunnel is "structurally sound."

KARL ROVE, ELBOW-PATCHED LIBERAL. Lowell Sun columnist and WBZ Radio (AM 1030) talk-show host Paul Sullivan says that George W. Bush did not win because of gay-hating religious zealots. He writes:

The claim that this election was some sort of religious revolution is a smokescreen that the liberal media, Hollywood know-it-alls and the elbow-patched campus crowd use to explain why they lost.

But Paul! Karl Rove says you're wrong.

posted at 9:29 AM | 7 comments | link

7 Comments:

Dan,

Instead of getting your knickers in a twist over the Big Dig and Paul Sullivan why haven't you written a word for Media Log on the reporting surrounding Yasir Arafat's conidtion? By my count some major media outlets have gotten it wrong and there seems to be all kinds of misinformation shooting around out there.

You're a media critic. Reporting on the media is your forte. You're good at it. Isn't it important to look at what the media is doing (and how they are being played) in the Arafat situation?

Nothing you write about the Big Dig or Karl Rove is going to have any bearing on anyone's understanding of those stories -- you're just another voice. However a lot of readers could be informed by some good media criticsm over this mess that is surroudning Arafat. The media is part of the story here and you're missing it.

By Anonymous, at 10:00 AM  

I write about what interests me. Whether Arafat dies today, tomorrow, next week, or has actually been dead for three days is of minimal interest to me. Obviously everyone is lying, and the media are repeating those lies. Nothing new there!

By Dan Kennedy, at 10:15 AM  

I can't believe I'm writing in defense of Paul Sullivan, but Paul may be on to something.

http://www.emergingdemocraticmajorityweblog.com/donkeyrising/archives/000934.php

Alan Abramowitz looks at Bush's improved performance from 2000 to 2004. This improvement was across the board and was not affected by whether or not there was an anti-Gay Marriage referendum on the ballot.

By Steve, at 10:25 AM  

Sounds like you misread the article, Dan. Karl Rove "said he was not certain that the votes (against same sex marriage) necessarily helped Mr. Bush to defeat Senator John Kerry of Massachusetts. He noted that Mr. Kerry had won Michigan and Oregon, where the amendments passed by large margins."

By Anonymous, at 4:16 PM  

No. All you're pointing out is that Rove tried to back away from the implications of what he'd just said.

By Dan Kennedy, at 4:28 PM  

Not really. Karl Rove was just noting that same sex marriage is a huge issue, given that 11 states overwhelmingly approved of bans in November. But he never said it hurt Kerry, who ALSO opposed same sex marriage.

Sure, a significant portion of voters cited moral values. But it's unclear that they were referring to same sex marriage. Maybe it was the flip-flopping issue, which the Republicans flogged heavily. The GOP tried hard (and somewhat successfully) to make the case that Kerry has no moral spine and will say anything to get votes.

By Anonymous, at 6:04 PM  

The Big Dig is just another of a continuing flow of failures. Space shuttles, Iraq, decline from largest creditor to largest debtor, etc. It's damned depressing.

By Anonymous, at 5:26 AM  

Post a Comment

MEDIA LOG ARCHIVES


Dan Kennedy is senior writer and media critic for the Boston Phoenix.

This page is powered by Blogger. Isn't yours?


 









about the phoenix |  find the phoenix |  advertising info |  privacy policy |  the masthead | Webmaster |  feedback |  work for us
Copyright © 2005 Phoenix Media/Communications Group