The Phoenix Network:
 
 
About  |  Advertise
Adult  |  Moonsigns  |  Band Guide  |  Blogs  |  In Pictures
 
Books  |  Comedy  |  Dance  |  Museum And Gallery  |  Theater
Nominate-best-2010

Reading is fundamentalist

By DAVID S. BERNSTEIN  |  December 22, 2009

Beck mocks the "Ivy Leaguers" running the economy; Levin writes of the "legions of academics" who "serve as [the statists'] missionaries." Each of the authors assures you that these complicated issues are not actually complicated at all. A few simple and obvious principles are all you need to answer every policy question — and to feel justified in berating those who disagree.

3) They're not wrong — they're lying
But if the answers are so obvious, how is it that so many seemingly intelligent people in positions of authority can be so wrong?

Because it's more insidious than that, these writers say: our liberal leaders are not "wrong" — rather, they are lying.

Democrats don't actually believe that their policies will work, they write — nobody could be that stupid.

Beck repeatedly accuses liberals of lying in Common Sense. "The snakes responsible for this scheme know that it isn't going to work," he writes at one point. The thesis of Coulter's book is that liberal politicians (with their co-conspirators in the media) collude to destroy the reputations of all who stand in their way. (Coulter even insists that George W. Bush's infamous claim that Saddam Hussein was seeking yellowcake uranium from Niger was "indisputably true.")

Democrats use these lies to deceive Americans while concealing their true motivations, write Morris and McGann. The authors repeatedly claim that liberal policies — including the economic-stimulus package, immigration reform, and changing of unionization rules — are driven not by a desire to improve people's lives, but to turn them into government-dependent Democratic voters. Malkin declares that Obama's family, friends, associates, and appointees are corrupt and venal — every one of them.

Several of the authors claim that liberal leaders are pushing climate change concerns not because they fear for the planet, but because they want to increase government control over business and the economy. Levin adds a twist to this theory: liberals despise the automobile, which "provides the individual with a tangible means to exercise his independence through mobility." Clever statists.

4) Wool over their eyes
One last problem remains. These conservatives are big proponents of democracy, the wisdom of the people, and the constitutional process — and yet a solid majority of American voters chose Obama and a Democratic-dominated Congress. So, shouldn't we all accept the results and move forward? After all, it's not as though anyone can steal an American presidential election, right?

But these authors strongly imply that the liberals did pilfer the 2008 presidential contest — or rather, the media did, through its deliberately biased reporting. The public knew not what it did at the ballot box.

Goldberg's entire book is dedicated to this premise. Coulter, too, is out to demonstrate that "the liberal media behemoth" is guilty of deliberately sabotaging the right. All eight books treat the "mainstream media" as a vile tool of the left. Levin explicitly advises against using "the media" as a primary source of information.

Many of these books bemoan the media's treatment of Palin — but none as caustically as Palin herself. Going Rogue never goes long without a new potshot at journalists. During an account of her mayoral tenure, she tells of a woman who thought that one of Palin's children had been caught using drugs, when it was actually the child of another city's mayor. Palin is aghast at the woman for believing and repeating the false rumor. "It would be a few years," she writes, "before I learned that some people make a living and even earn prestigious awards for doing exactly that."

< prev  1  |  2  |  3  |  4  |  5  |   next >
Related: , , , More more >
  Topics: Books , Barack Obama, Barack Obama, Arts,  More more >
  • Share:
  • Share this entry with Facebook
  • Share this entry with Digg
  • Share this entry with Delicious
  • RSS feed
  • Email this article to a friend
  • Print this article
1 Comments / Add Comment

TheMadKing

"Reading is Fundamentalist." How quaint and utterly predictable.

I expect the only thing that bothers you fine folks at the Phoenix more than the fact that conservatives can actually read is that it took eight years for the American people to fully vomit Republicans out of office, yet only one year for their stomachs to start churning in full again at the rank liberal progressive agenda that Obama, Reid and Pelosi et al are trying to shove down the electorate's throat. An agenda the American people did not vote for, by the way.

Might I suggest the roots of the problems for LibDems today, besides the proposed high taxes and stifling regulations being proposed in Congress in the midst of a recession and possible depression? It's the economy, stupid! If Congress and the White House put in even one-tenth the effort in creating jobs and putting Americans back to work as they are in trying to strangle businesses, bankrupt the country and kill even more jobs, Coakley could be out on a sailboat somewhere and mailing it in!

Until that happens, expect a lot more Scott Browns, Chris Christies and Bob McDonnells. What a difference a year in American politics can make, huh? God Bless America! Oh, I'm sorry. Can I say that here? I know it's kind of Fundamentalist and all...

Posted: January 16 2010 at 6:37 AM
HTML Prohibited
Add Comment

Today's Event Picks
ARTICLES BY DAVID S. BERNSTEIN
Share this entry with Delicious
  •   BAY STATE'S TOP LOBBYISTS  |  February 03, 2010
    Nearly everyone in Massachusetts felt the pinch of the recession in 2009 — even Beacon Hill lobbyists had to tighten their belts.
  •   ELEPHANT IN THE ROOM  |  January 27, 2010
    Platoons of state Republicans, energized by Scott Brown's stunning victory over Democrat Martha Coakley last week, are setting their sights on November.
  •   DISASTER, THEN DÉTENTE  |  January 25, 2010
    From the first days after the earthquake struck Haiti — long before anyone knew how dire the situation was, let alone how the US government would respond — pundits were wagging their tongues about the potential political implications. A poor response, they said, would invite comparisons to the Bush administration's bungled handling of Hurricane Katrina in New Orleans.
  •   HOW BROWN WON  |  January 22, 2010
    As the Massachusetts US Senate election unfolded yesterday, all that the pols and pundits wanted to talk about was how Martha Coakley managed to lose the race. And there is plenty there to dissect. But there is another part of the story, and that is how Scott Brown managed to win it.
  •   READY TO RUMBLE  |  January 13, 2010
    Last summer, the upcoming race that got most Bay State politicos salivating was the run for governor.

 See all articles by: DAVID S. BERNSTEIN

MOST POPULAR
RSS Feed of for the most popular articles
 Most Viewed   Most Emailed 



  |  Sign In  |  Register
 
thePhoenix.com:
Phoenix Media/Communications Group:
TODAY'S FEATURED ADVERTISERS
Copyright © 2010 The Phoenix Media/Communications Group