The Phoenix Network:
 
 
About  |  Advertise
 
Features  |  Reviews

Review: Never Let Me Go

A portrait of passivity
By BRETT MICHEL  |  September 24, 2010
2.0 2.0 Stars

 

Logan sure was on to something when he made his run in Michael Anderson's kitschy 1976 sci-fi classic. When you're condemned to death for reasons beyond your control, flight seems the way to go.

So it's puzzling to find that the three boarding-school graduates — Kathy (Carey Mulligan), Ruth (Keira Knightley), and Tommy (Andrew Garfield) — in Mark Romanek's dreamily photographed, oddly muted new movie are so accepting of their fates as organ "donors."

Kazuo Ishiguro likely explored their passivity in the novel (unread by me) on which this work of alternate history is based, but Alex Garland's screenplay never addresses the issue. What with the wealth of narration he's provided for Kathy, a "carer" for Ruth and Tommy until it's time for them to "donate," you wonder why he himself couldn't have donated more care to the inner lives of characters who remain dramatically lifeless.

Related: Review: Brothers, Review: Armored, Review: Irene in Time, More more >
  Topics: Reviews , Movies, Movie Reviews, Kazuo Ishiguro,  More more >
| More
3 Comments / Add Comment

Anonymous

Makes me sad that so many reviewers have missed the point of this story. Despite a general consensus that this movie was beautifully filmed and superbly acted, I've read so many reviewers bemoaning the unwillingness of the characters to run away. It's as if we've been so saturated with various iterations of the Logans Run type plots that we believe it's a universal truth that 'when you're condemned to death for reasons beyond your control, flight seems the way to go'. I don't agree with that statement, I think human beings react in a variety of ways to certain situations and this story chooses to tell the tale of people who didn't 'run' in a conventional sense but confronted their fate head on. These characters have been raised without a sense of their own worth, they feel that they were raised for a singular purpose which makes them special and they have little experience with the outside world (perhaps they feel fear and don't want to live in a world that views them so suspiciously). While the majority of similar distopian movies don't follow this path, in the real world, there are many examples of people passively accepting the life that's given to them. That's what makes this movie so special.
Posted: September 22 2010 at 9:51 AM

Anonymous

I've read the book and Kazuo Ishiguro doesn't go into a detailed explanation as to why these characters passively accept their fate (which is one of the reasons why the book stays with readers for so long). It's 'oddly muted' because the adaptation is trying to project the spirit of the novel onto film. Obviously if you can't accept an alternative to the Logans Run story, then this story won't work for you. If you on the other hand can accept a non-formulaic approach to sci-fi then perhaps you should check this out.
Posted: September 22 2010 at 12:40 PM

Anonymous

yes, in listening to discussions with the Director on NPR, he is indeed trying to capture what Ishiguro himself was exploring in the novel (which is very subtle in its own way) ...the fact that many, if not most, people do stay in situations that aren't necessarily "good" and that most people don't run away... They don't leave the soul-destroying job, they don't leave the empty/destructive marriage, but hang in there out of fear, complacency, or the uncertainty of what 'running away' would bring. I think it's fascinating because I think this is a large predicament for individuals in the western world, in particular, who are taught that individual needs trump larger, social needs, and yet are often unable to put their own needs first and thus live in a state of conflict. In other societies/cultures, this conflict is not the case. In Japan, for instance, submission to authority as a place of honor extends deep into the Japanese conscience....much in contrast to our more "american" ideas about the place of the individual.
Posted: September 30 2010 at 12:28 PM
Add Comment
HTML Prohibited

 Friends' Activity   Popular   Most Viewed 
[ 07/22 ]   Daniel Tosh  @ Wang Theatre
[ 07/22 ]   Kingston Chamber Music Festival  @ Fine Arts Center Concert Hall at University of Rhode Island
ARTICLES BY BRETT MICHEL
Share this entry with Delicious
  •   REVIEW: WINNIE THE POOH  |  July 19, 2011
    If you don't mind paying full price for something so brief, you'll be delighted to find a musically driven film the whole family can enjoy.
  •   REVIEW: HORRIBLE BOSSES  |  July 12, 2011
    After two comedies, it's clear Seth Gordon is good at making . . . documentaries.
  •   REVIEW: A BETTER LIFE  |  July 12, 2011
    A Better Life  tells a tale of a father's love and his struggles to give his son the opportunities he never had.
  •   REVIEW: JUST LIKE US  |  July 05, 2011
    This brainchild of Egyptian-American comedian Ahmed Ahmed is basically a collection of his home movies as he travels from the US alongside comics like Maz Jobrani and Whitney Cummings to perform stand-up in Dubai, Beirut, Cairo, Riyadh, and back.
  •   REVIEW: LARRY CROWNE  |  July 05, 2011
    Coming 15 years after That Thing You Do!, Tom Hanks's second, confident outing as a feature director finds him co-writing a lighter-than-air trifle with old family friend Nia Vardalos, who's made nothing but awful films since initially charming audiences with My Big Fat Greek Wedding.

 See all articles by: BRETT MICHEL

MOST POPULAR
RSS Feed of for the most popular articles
 Most Viewed   Most Emailed 



  |  Sign In  |  Register
 
thePhoenix.com:
Phoenix Media/Communications Group:
TODAY'S FEATURED ADVERTISERS
Copyright © 2011 The Phoenix Media/Communications Group