The Phoenix Network:
 
 
About  |  Advertise
Adult  |  Moonsigns  |  Band Guide  |  Blogs  |  In Pictures
 
CD Reviews  |  Classical  |  Live Reviews  |  Music Features

 rethinking public policy

SHOULD RADIO STATIONS PAY MORE ROYALTIES?

Copyright and intellectual property laws have always been complicated in the United States. And they get even more complicated when you look at copyright as an international phenomenon. But overseas is where Mary LaFrance, a professor of intellectual property law at University of Nevada, Las Vegas, is asking the music industry to look — because doing so could unlock hundreds of millions of dollars in uncollected royalties for American artists.

LaFrance's suggestion is difficult to explain, and would be even more difficult to enact. Plus, it comes with a whopper of a catch. But it was inventive enough that her paper beat out dozens of public-policy suggestions to win LaFrance publication in Harvard Law School's Journal of Sports and Entertainment Law; she'll present it to music-biz insiders at the Rethink conference this week.

To vastly oversimplify: terrestrial radio and TV broadcasters in the United States have long been exempt from paying what's known as a PUBLIC-PERFORMANCE ROYALTY. In many jurisdictions overseas, that's not the case. Even though an American artist earns a performance royalty for being played on a European radio station, that money often never makes its way back to the artist. Why? The Europeans are withholding those royalties because their artists aren't making performance royalties when they're played on U.S. radio stations.

LaFrance points out that hundreds of millions of dollars would be available to American artists from European rights — if only the U.S. would stop exempting its radio stations from paying the full performance royalty. (Good luck with that: commercial radio stations should be really excited about paying a tax on every song they play.)

Although LaFrance clearly realizes that her idea would be a total fucking nightmare to implement, she's proposing it at an interesting time. Unlike terrestrial stations, internet radio stations are being forced to pay a public-performance royalty. And since the barriers between old-time radio and new-media radio are narrowing, more artists, managers, and online broadcasters are beginning to ask why terrestrial radio should retain its exemption.

<< first  ...< prev  1  |  2  |  3  |  4  |  5  |  6  |  7  |  8  |  9  |  10  |   next >...  last >>

8 of 11 (results 11)
Related: , , , More more >
  Topics: Music Features , Music, music industry, Ben Folds,  More more >
| More
5 Comments / Add Comment

lindisfarne

I wish I could read all the article without having to click in each part; it would be easier to save too. Regards,
Posted: April 22 2011 at 10:12 AM

Anonymous

The Patronism.com concept looks promising. Says you need just over a hundred “patrons” for a musician to earn a living. I wonder if they really can save the music industry?
Posted: April 22 2011 at 10:41 AM

ConquerNewEngland

I really wish that someone had looked at Conquer Entertainment. Conquer Entertainment will do for independent and major artists what the traditional label has failed to do–allow them to have complete control of their careers and be compensated fairly. Conquer Entertainment offers services that allow all artists the ability to record, promote, perform and globally distribute their music and make a profit in multiple ways. 100 fans can get you a $300 check every month...and that;s only one way we are getting artists paid. More info contact me.
Posted: April 22 2011 at 12:08 PM

ConquerNewEngland

bjboucher74 AT gmail DOT com...seems that the Bio feature isn't available! :)
Posted: April 22 2011 at 12:10 PM

John Pointer

I noticed that one of the other companies passes 75% of the revenue to the artist. Patronism passes 85%, and with only 104 patrons at the current site average an artist nets over $1000/mo. We're set up like this because I am an artist, built it to serve my own needs, and created the deal I'd want when we turned it into a platform.

Our other strength is that we know the difference between consumers and patrons. We use our expertise to help artists attract and serve the latter, while still being able to sell consumables to the rest of their fanbase.

John Pointer
CEO/Co-founder, Patronism.com
Posted: April 23 2011 at 7:05 PM
Add Comment
HTML Prohibited

 Friends' Activity   Popular   Most Viewed 
[ 04/30 ]   Boston Comic Con  @ Hynes Convention Center
MOST POPULAR
RSS Feed of for the most popular articles
 Most Viewed   Most Emailed 



  |  Sign In  |  Register
 
TODAY'S FEATURED ADVERTISERS
Copyright © 2011 The Phoenix Media/Communications Group