Insider baseball
Part 3
by Dan Kennedy
For the moment, the Red Sox are playing it quiet. And business-community
leaders argue that the team is smart to work behind the scenes rather than try
to impose an unpopular idea on a combative neighborhood, as Kraft attempted to
do.
"I'm more optimistic that they don't have something specific that they're
going to roll out, saying, `This is what we're going to do,' " says Paul
Guzzi, president of the Boston Chamber of Commerce, explaining he takes the
Sox' non-stance as a sign that the team will put a premium on communicating and
reaching out.
But if Harrington and his point man for a new stadium, Sox vice-president John
Buckley, are communicating and reaching out, it's news to developers,
consultants, and others who make it a business to keep tabs on big construction
projects.
Robert Walsh, a developer who's friends with both Menino and Buckley, and who
was recently identified in the Boston Herald as someone who could play
an important role in building a new ballpark, says, "I haven't talked to John
Buckley since well before spring training started. I don't know what the Red
Sox are doing."
Adds Michael Goldman, a political and business consultant: "I think the Red
Sox believe that, unlike the Patriots, they are a sacrosanct commodity, and
that eventually something will happen to their benefit. You often wonder
sometimes whether they think of themselves as junior Blanche DuBoises,
depending on the kindness of strangers. Well guess what?"
Whatever the Red Sox end up doing, their principal political asset is that --
well, they're the Red Sox, with 96 years of tradition, from Cy Young to Babe
Ruth, from Ted Williams to Mo Vaughn. An organization that's virtually
synonymous with the Jimmy Fund, which has been helping kids with cancer for 50
years. An institution that genuinely appears to be trying to overcome its
legacy of country-club smugness and racism by reaching out to the
African-American community. "From what I can tell about the past, this is an
awful lot better than it ever was. I've been here for 10 years, and it's gotten
better every year," says Art Taylor, associate director of Northeastern
University's Center for the Study of Sport in Society.
The one option the Red Sox don't have is to do nothing. At some point within
the next 10 to 15 years, team officials predict it will begin costing more to
keep the crumbling ballpark standing than to build a new stadium. Even more
important, the team has an unusual ownership situation: John Harrington is not
the owner per se, but rather the head of a trust that has run the team since
the death of owner Jean Yawkey, in 1992. Under the terms of the trust,
Harrington will eventually have to sell the team, though Sox spokesman
Bresciani says there's no deadline.
Nevertheless, Harrington has a mandate to maximize the team's value before
sale, and a new stadium is a big part of that. Indeed, Massachusetts House
Speaker Tom Finneran (D-Mattapan) cites the trust in his populist argument
against using any taxpayer money to help pay for a new stadium. "They need to
increase the value of that franchise to give the beneficiaries of the trust a
big payout," Finneran says. "That's the real game here. It's not the game on
the field."
Boston lawyer Mike McCormack, a former city councilor, recalls talking with a
top Red Sox official a few years ago, after it became clear at a public hearing
that South Boston would not welcome the team with open arms. "He said, `We
thought they loved us because we're the Red Sox. Boy, how wrong we
were,' " McCormack recalls.
Far from energizing the Sox, though, McCormack says the experience seems to
have scared them into inaction. "The Red Sox have done zippo," he says. "If it
was anybody else other than the Red Sox, it would doom them. It's like an
election. You have to start out with the premise that you're an underdog in the
race, and that you're running against an incumbent. You can't just go for the
quick hit. You've got to devise a strategy and stick with it."
Dan Kennedy can be reached at dkennedy[a]phx.com.