Misbehavin' Taylor
Devils with halos, seraphs with horns at Jacob's Pillow
by Marcia B. Siegel
In a pre-performance interview before the second program of a week devoted to
his work at Jacob's Pillow, Paul Taylor affirmed a provocative quote from his
autobiography put to him by Village Voice dance critic Deborah Jowitt.
"Turn Order and God over and what've you got there in back? Chaos and Satan,
naturally. But the back side is not the opposite; it's of the same cloth --
some say it's exactly the same thing." We didn't have very far to look for the
evidence.
Even if the orderly, Baroque-flavored Cascade (1999) were nothing more
than its glossy surface, the new dance that followed it, Fiends
Angelical, made the audience uncomfortable long after its initial offenses
wore off. This was good, I thought. Taylor can be deceptively ingratiating, and
the modern audience, having been indoctrinated by a world of technically
polished and empty dances, can get so pleased with the Taylor dancers'
accomplishments that his misanthropic undertones go undetected. His particular
blend of syrup and vitriol prevents the audience from becoming too complacent,
too familiar.
The fiendish piece smacked open with the high-pitched, grating chords of George
Crumb's Dark Angels, a sudden flood of harsh light (by Jennifer Tipton),
and there in the glare a bunch of -- what? creatures? -- in flesh-colored
leotards banded with multicolored tape and black nappy Afro-wigs with red
headbands. (Santo Loquasto was responsible for the costumes.) The creatures are
virtually unisex, and they might represent some kind of stereotypical
primitives, a clutch of pickaninnies squatting on the ground, then springing up
with kinked legs and arms. I think it's the wigs that establish these
unfortunate associations, but maybe they'll be eliminated once the dance has
been road-tested.
Francie Huber, in a sarong, dreadlocks, and cunning brown horns, seemed to
preside over the populace. My mind was ticking back to several other Taylor
dances where a strong and mysterious female instructs, tests, and finally
transforms a bunch of communicants, usually bringing them some kind of
enlightenment. And I thought of his enigmatic Runes (1975), where
everyone was potentially a shaman and the rituals seemed desolate, even
pointless.
In Fiends Angelical, the rabble surge across the stage with heavy feet
and clawed hands, forming clumpy circles and two-dimensional groupings. Lisa
Viola and Patrick Corbin emerge to do a duet of snarling intimacy and a demonic
softshoe. They finish by choking each other to the ground. Huber performs
incantations over them and eventually the other dancers draw a thin red ribbon
out from the midst of their crumpled bodies. I suppose this symbolizes an
exorcism -- the opposite of the ribbon of hatred that Medea swallows in Martha
Graham's Cave of the Heart as she incites herself to revenge.
The group pull the ribbon out into a five-pointed star, so that they all
partake of its healing power. Corbin and Viola dance a formal kind of
rededication to each other, and finally the group return, still in distorted
postures but floppy, relaxed. Huber shows them how to lift their arms, and the
dance ends as they seem to be testing new wings.
The other important event of the Taylor company's two programs was the revival
of Big Bertha, his bloodcurdling view of Americana from 1970. With a
vigorous cast of young dancers (Kristi Egtvedt as Big Bertha the mechanical
band machine and Orion Duckstein, Heather Berest, and Annmaria Mazzini as the
doomed tourist family), the piece holds up as perhaps the best and bitterest
satire ever choreographed. I thought of it as the inverse of Fiends
Angelical, a process of dissipation, the ruin of innocence rather than its
restoration.
Taylor is a big fan of American artifacts -- music, dances, movies -- and he
found the music for Big Bertha in the St. Louis Melody Museum. Band
machines predated the jukebox. They were like extravagant music boxes or player
pianos: you inserted your nickel to start a tape with the notes punched in it,
and as the tape rolled through the machine, it activated a piano or organ, and
sometimes a whole gang of other instruments, all thumping away without the
benefit of human operators. Big Bertha is a life-size drum majorette, padded
and corseted 1890s style, who decorates the front of the gaudy band machine.
Taylor endows her with the mean, raunchy soul of a dominatrix. When the
customer puts in his money, she jerks into action, keeping time to the music
with a baton and a robotic goosestep. Furtively, alarmingly, she coughs,
belches, scratches between her shoulder blades with the baton. Something about
these too-human actions seems sinister, and you remember that just a minute
ago, when the curtain opened, three wounded figures you hardly noticed were
scrambling away and didn't return.
A sweet, typical America family do arrive: dad in loafers and an untucked
flowered shirt, prim and pretty mom, and little daughter in a pink circle skirt
with appliqué'd poodle. They start the machine and Big Bertha seems to
eye them with anticipation. As she wields her baton, they start to dance.
Daughter shows off a little. Pleased, mom and dad do a few steps from when they
were kids. Bertha eggs them on, singling out dad for special commands. Things
start to go out of control. Dad stomps heavily into the floor, and his arms go
loose. He tries to pull mom into a sexy dance. When she hesitates, he slaps
her. He pats daughter on the shoulder, a little too appreciatively. She's
shocked but kind of likes it. The good clean fun goes carnal. While dad drags
the daughter behind the machine, mom pulls off her wedding ring and does a
lascivious shimmy. Big Bertha plays "Take Me out to the Ballgame" and "My Blue
Heaven" and "The Old Piano Roll Blues." When everybody's exhausted and
degraded, Bertha takes dad as her partner, prodding him into a stiff duet of
robot love.
Paul Taylor may have been commenting on the buttoned-up proprieties of his
generation in the '50s, but dancing and popular culture still represent a safe
place where our raunchiest desires can be acted out, or at least vicariously
experienced. I respect him deeply for having the courage to bring back this
epic critique of family values. I'm not sure you could find this deep vein of
malevolence in every Paul Taylor dance, but some of the ones with the smiliest
façades can break into crazed misbehavior.
Aureole, for instance: done on Program B, it was considered Taylor's
"white ballet" when it was choreographed. In 1962, modern dancers weren't
supposed to make pretty, serene, formal dances with a lot of jumps in them. But
in Aureole's last movement, which is still extremely patterned and
musical, the dancers tilt way off center, rotate their arms inward, veer across
the space like racing cars gone berserk. Taylor's social-dance pieces seethe
with the sexual anger of the tango (Piazzolla Caldera) and the ironic
escapism of wartime lindy and rumba (Company B).
It was Taylor's 70th birthday, July 29, that prompted last week's celebration.
Jacob's Pillow not only devoted the programs in the main theater to his company
but assembled a whole roster of related events. In addition to his talk with
Jowitt, the Taylor Two company performed, and several Taylor alumni presented
their own choreography. There was also a fascinating exhibition of his
assemblages, little art pieces made of found objects, things that drift in and
out of the landscape around his Long Island house. Each item is artfully
arranged and titled with some sly or wise reference. There's a piece of
driftwood in a frame with the big letters "AND" painted on it but partly worn
off. It's called "A word to the wise." One of a series of variations for
spinning dancer/choreographer Laura Dean is a rakish spiral of raffia and wood
titled "To dance is to twirl." A frog, after a possible encounter with an
automobile, reposes under glass with the caption "Dancing flat out." There are
dead butterflies, bugs, mice, all laid out appealingly and playing the role of
messengers from Taylor's witty mind.
"They're just games," Taylor told Deborah Jowitt about the assemblages. "The
subjects are the same as in my dances. Death. Leaving. Is there anything else
besides that? Well, there are the sexual aspects."