Monkey see, monkey do
Creationism, however popular, has no place in our public schools
Seventy-five years after we thought the issue had been settled by the Scopes
trial, the evolution-versus-creationism debate has returned. First there was
the decision last August by the Kansas Board of Education to remove evolution
from the state's science curriculum. Then a publicly financed charter school in
Rochester, New York, announced that it will teach creationism and evolution as
competing theories of the origins of the universe. Now the results of a poll
commissioned by People for the American Way to gauge Americans' beliefs about
evolution and creationism have been released -- and they should send a shudder
down the spine of anyone in this country who cares about the separation of
church and state.
First the good news: 83 percent of Americans think evolution should be
taught in public schools. And now the bad: 79 percent of poll respondents
say it would be okay to teach creationism in public schools. Perhaps the only
bright spot is that most of the respondents in the 79 percent also say it
should be made clear that creationism is a belief rather than a scientific
theory. Previous polls have included the evolution/creationism question as one
among many on religion, but the People for the American Way poll, conducted by
DYG, Inc., focused solely on the issue, posing in-depth questions to 1500
Americans. (The full report can be viewed at www.pfaw.org.)
If ever there was a sign that we are in serious need of leadership in this
country, this is it. The question is, where can we find it? Shortly after the
Kansas school-board decision was announced, vice-president and presidential
candidate Al Gore, the noted environment and science wonk, waffled on the
issue: he said creationism should be taught in public schools in a religious
context. George W. Bush, no surprise, said he believed creationism should be
taught in public schools. Bill Bradley was the only candidate to criticize the
Kansas decision. Although critics ranging from conservative pundit Charles
Krauthammer to liberal scientist and writer Stephen Jay Gould railed against
the decision, they apparently didn't have much influence over the way the
public thinks about the issue.
Gore's hedge betrays a view of the debate as a matter of science versus
religion, a view that is shared by many. And yet science and religion are not
incompatible. In 1950 Pope Pius XII wrote that a belief in the theory of
evolution was consistent with religious faith. Pope John Paul II, in 1996,
publicly stated his support of evolutionary theory. The simple fact is that
creationism -- the notion that God, or some other divine being, created the
universe -- runs contrary to scientific evidence, which supports the theory of
evolution. In other words, this is not Darwin versus God; it's more like Darwin
versus the tooth fairy.
To be sure, evangelical Christians such as Jerry Falwell do embrace the
"science" of creationism. Such conservatives are quick to dismiss evolution as
"just a theory." But anyone who has spent time in a public-high-school science
class (except, perhaps, those attending school in Kansas) can tell you that a
scientific theory is an idea that can be tested with facts. In this case, the
evidence is fossils that show species evolving from one to another and
geological strata that show the age of the earth to be measured in billions,
not thousands, of years.
It is distressing to think that a solid majority of the public believes it's
okay for high-school teachers -- whether they specialize in science, history,
philosophy, religion, or literature -- to teach that a divine being created the
universe a mere 6000 years ago, even if this is taught as a "belief" and not a
theory. Those who comfort themselves by thinking this sort of thing could
happen only in rural America should think again. Five years ago, religious
conservatives gained control of the local school board in suburban Merrimack,
New Hampshire. They very nearly succeeded in bringing creationism into the
high-school science curriculum. This sort of thing could happen in New
England. What this poll has taught us is that we must be vigilant in keeping
this voodoo science out of our classrooms.
What do you think? Send an e-mail to letters[a]phx.com.