Preventing tragedy
The state must increase its commitment to treating mentally ill
adolescents
The state is flush with extra revenues. The governor wants to enact a tax cut.
In the past few years, politicians such as House Speaker Tom Finneran, Governor
Paul Cellucci, and former governor Bill Weld have done a remarkable job
convincing the public that everyone is making it in Massachusetts -- and that
we don't have to spend extra money on social issues.
Problem is, they're wrong. One example is the state of mental-health services
for children in Massachusetts.
One year ago, Massachusetts Department of Mental Health commissioner Marylou
Sudders made headlines when an internal memo she wrote was leaked to the media,
warning that the demand for psychiatric beds for minors with acute mental
illness had reached "near crisis proportions." Despite a flurry of media
attention to the issue, things have only gotten worse (see "Disorderly
Conduct," News and Features, July 7).
Emergency-room physicians and pediatricians in virtually every Massachusetts
hospital treat more and more troubled children -- kids who put their pets in
microwaves, attempt suicide, and threaten their parents with weapons. Since
1996, Boston Medical Center has witnessed a 55 percent increase in the
number of these children: 60 child psychiatric patients per month. Most stay in
the emergency room for hours, long after other patients have left, because no
one is on hand to treat them. Half of them are transported to the general
pediatric ward, where they wait as long as 10 days for an open bed in a
psychiatric ward. While waiting, psychiatric patients displace others with
chronic diseases such as leukemia, diabetes, and asthma. This, in turn,
disrupts hospital operations and stretches staff resources. Such settings,
meanwhile, are inappropriate for child psychiatric patients -- they're
frequently seen by pediatricians who may be adept at treating physical
ailments, but not mental illnesses. Most are watched round-the-clock by guards
to ensure against escape and self-inflicted injury; sometimes, violent kids are
restrained.
Even when troubled children get into psychiatric facilities, the problem
doesn't end. Though they receive much-needed short-term therapy in a
psychiatric hospital, there's no guarantee that these patients will get proper
follow-up treatment when they leave. There aren't nearly enough aftercare
programs to treat those in acute hospitals who have stabilized and can move
into long-term outpatient facilities. So they remain in hospitals, taking
valuable beds from others in crisis. State statistics show that 82 kids were
"stuck" as of this past May, compared to just 16 kids in May 1998. The irony in
all this -- as Fred Stoddard, a child psychiatrist at Mass General Hospital,
points out -- is that the field of psychiatry has advanced to the point where
doctors can provide real help to disturbed youngsters. Yet this help can't be
provided "at the scale we need to" because resources simply aren't available.
This should inspire a sense of urgency among all state officials. Until
now, though, the state DMH has been something of a lone voice when it comes to
solutions. This year, Sudders and her staff lobbied successfully for a
$10 million fiscal 2001 budget item to open 80 new beds at residential
homes across the state, thereby moving more stuck kids into aftercare. But that
money will do little to effect systemic change. There is only enough staff, for
instance, to open 56 of these 80 new beds.
Long-term solutions are required. The state DMH needs money to expand
prevention services so troubled children don't have to resort to emergency
rooms in the first place. It must increase staff size and clinical capacity at
aftercare facilities. And, finally, it must improve coordination among state
agencies, insurers, and providers. These solutions cost money. Getting it will
mean shifting budget priorities to fund what Sudders calls "the front-door and
back-door services."
Right now, mental-health care for children and adolescents isn't a priority
because we don't see the problem. But we'd be wise to heed the warnings of
those who do. "The situation is scary," says Walter Harrison, a pediatrician at
North Shore Medical Center. "I don't want to see another Columbine in
Massachusetts."
What do you think? Send an e-mail to letters[a]phx.com.