McCain lite, continued
by Seth Gitell
|
MIDDLE MAN:
Gore is
pushing hard to attract voters from the political center.
|
Some conservatives say that Gore's embrace of campaign-finance reform is an
unusually effective weapon against Bush. "It's fashionable in Washington to
deprecate the importance of campaign-finance reform," says the Weekly
Standard's William Kristol. "But it reflects for voters a certain
commitment to clean up the process. Republicans can snicker about that and talk
about the Buddhist temple. [But] I think it helps Gore. He's at least
appropriated some of McCain's elements."
And that's not all: Gore has even usurped McCain's theme of patriotism. During
his convention acceptance speech, Gore emphasized his service in Vietnam. "I
enlisted in the army because I knew if I didn't go, someone else in the small
town of Carthage, Tennessee, would go in my place," he said. "I was an Army
reporter in Vietnam. When I was there, I didn't do the most, or run the gravest
danger. But I was proud to wear my country's uniform." That pride was evident a
few weeks later when Gore donned his Veterans of Foreign Wars garrison cap to
proclaim "an unshakable national commitment to our veterans" -- another one of
the hallmarks of McCain's campaign.
Even Gore's choice of a vice-presidential nominee reflects the McCain
influence. On the surface, McCain, the war-hero scion of an all-American
military dynasty, and Lieberman, the professorial son of an Orthodox Jewish
milkman, don't have much in common. But in the Senate, Lieberman and McCain
worked closely in many matters relating to foreign policy and defense. Each is
the type of senator to whom the other party can look for support on specific
issues. That kind of bipartisanship has become extremely rare on Capitol Hill,
but it is welcomed by the American public, particularly swing voters. To be
sure, nothing in Lieberman's portfolio can come close to McCain's status as a
war hero, but his staunch moral and religious background elevates him above the
usual Washington hack. In this way, again, his selection is a nod to what
political scientists used to call "the vital center."
"The choice of Lieberman is a choice that transcends the two parties," says the
Hudson Institute's Weinstein. "Lieberman is someone who stands there with some
form of moral authority. His religion, while not really heroic, shows he stands
for something beyond naked political ambition." In other words, beyond Clinton.
One Washington-based Republican insider, requesting anonymity, says that he,
too, has noted the similarity between the new Gore and McCain: "The most
important aspect of his appeal is the fight against special interests and [for]
campaign-finance reform. Gore's tone is much more potentially appealing to the
independents. A lot of people in Republican ranks underestimated his ability to
capture that message to appeal to the swing voters."
Indeed. "The big surprise is I did not think the Gore people would be smart
enough to do this," says Democratic consultant Michael Goldman, "and even if
they were smart enough, I did not know if Gore himself would have the guts to
do it."
Even as Gore has displayed the wit to take wisely from McCain, Bush's campaign
has blundered by arrogantly acting as if it were above learning from the
senator -- even though McCain attracted more of the type of voters that a
candidate needs to win the general election. "Bush seems to have made no effort
at all to appropriate any of McCain," says Kristol. Take foreign policy. When
the Kosovo war broke out last year, Kristol notes, McCain gained notoriety for
boldly supporting US military involvement and criticizing the Clinton
administration for not going far enough. Now Bush's running mate, Dick Cheney,
is calling for the recall of troops in the Balkans. "What launched McCain was
Kosovo," says Kristol. "Bush and Cheney sound more like congressional
Republicans who opposed Kosovo. If you were attracted to McCain because he was
for a strong national defense and a muscular America abroad and
campaign-finance reform at home, you might not be attracted to Gore, but you
wouldn't be won over to Bush by anything Bush is doing."
Not everyone believes that Gore's strategy of borrowing from McCain's message
will attract swing voters to his candidacy. Ed Goeas, the Republicans
co-architect of the respected "Battleground" poll, which gives a detailed voter
analysis of swing areas, contends that Gore has not received a post-convention
bounce at all. "I'm seeing that he hasn't gotten a boost," says Goeas, arguing
that the other polls have over-counted Democratic and union stalwarts because
the polls are conducted on weekends. (Goeas contends that such weekend polls
over-count union members as a general rule.) In addition, says Goeas, his
polling numbers show Bush leading Gore among white ethnic Catholics, the kind
of Reagan-Democrat swing voters who gravitated to McCain. Goeas further notes
that the debate over the McCain phenomenon overstates the issue because such a
small percentage of the electorate actually voted in the presidential
primaries. "It's a trap people always get into saying who these voting groups
were during the primaries," he says.