The vision thing
(continued)
by Susan Ryan-Vollmar
|
|
|
|
WORLD OF POSSIBILITIES?
Frank McCourt's land on the waterfront could answer the question of where to build a new park for the Sox.
The park could anchor stretch of land while the convention center, above, anchors the other.
|
If Menino has his way, the Sox will stay in the Fenway and 300-foot office
towers will go up along the waterfront. At a press conference held the day of
Harrington's surprise announcement, Menino said he didn't understand why anyone
would raise the possibility of building a new park for the Sox elsewhere in the
city -- much less outside city limits. "It's the same location," he said. "The
site's the site right now. . . . The thing I have an issue with
is that we've shown you the other sites."
Actually, he hasn't shown us the other sites. The Boston Redevelopment
Authority (BRA) conducted a study of 21 potential sites for the park within
Boston's city limits. The BRA has not made that study public, but one City Hall
insider who viewed the results told the Phoenix that of the original 21
sites, only six are still available: two at Crosstown, one at Suffolk Downs,
and three in South Boston, including the waterfront. The waterfront easily
surpassed every other location on several important criteria for building a new
park: it was accessible to public transportation and major highways, and
construction disruption to existing homes and businesses would have been
minimized. But the site was rejected, she said, because of the possibility of
fog coming in over the park from the harbor.
Despite Menino's wishes to keep the team in the Fenway, right now it doesn't
look as if the Boston City Council will approve financing of city bonds to pay
for the $112 million Menino has promised the team. "I think the bill that
came out of the State House that needed the local [approval] of the city
council is probably dead," says at-large councilor Stephen Murphy. Councilor
Mike Ross, whose district includes the Fenway, is more blunt. "The likelihood
of the council approving financing for a new park is the same likelihood as me
climbing Mount Everest before the Sox are sold," he says. It takes a two-thirds
majority of the 13-member council to approve bond financing, and seven
councilors have publicly stated their opposition to the deal. And Menino has
said that he won't even put the financing deal before the council until a new
owner is named.
That leaves the Sox without the money to build their new ballpark in the
Fenway. They do have options, however. In addition to McCourt's waterfront
property, Assembly Square in Somerville is frequently mentioned as a
possibility; Somerville mayor Dorothy Kelly Gay says she'd welcome the team to
her city should the Fenway deal fall through. Suffolk Downs has also been
mentioned, as has property in Everett. The most interesting of these prospects,
however, is the waterfront -- because it would keep the Sox in the city, and
because McCourt already owns the land needed to build a park.
But there could be an even bigger obstacle to building on the waterfront than
McCourt's apparent lack of interest: community opposition. South Boston
activists sent New England Patriots owner Robert Kraft packing five years ago
when he proposed building a new football stadium on the waterfront. It's always
been assumed that the community would react the same way to any other
sports-stadium proposal.
There's a big difference, though between the effects a football stadium and a
baseball park would have on a community. For one thing, baseball games aren't
day-long events that attract lots of tailgating parties. Baseball parks, which
host about 80 games per year, also have bigger economic effects than football
stadiums, which host only about eight games per year. A baseball park could
provide jobs to members of the community. As one City Hall observer puts it: "A
lot of kids who live in South Boston could pay their tuition by working [at a
new ballpark]." There's no question that a baseball park transforms a community
more profoundly than a football stadium does. But LEPAC's Mahoney says that
given the choice between a baseball park and 300-foot office towers, he'd take
the park.
Building a ballpark on the waterfront has been a "topic" at some of LEPAC's
meetings, according to Mahoney. (LEPAC has a membership of about 125 people
from around South Boston, Mahoney says, although the Lower End is the South
Boston neighborhood closest to the waterfront.) "There's some type of illusion
that the community is dead set against [a baseball park on the waterfront]," he
says. "The community may very well be. But the community hasn't been asked."
So will Menino ever ask the people of South Boston whether they'd welcome a
baseball park? Such a question would require a radical shift in thinking about
the waterfront. As one City Hall insider says, it would require "vision" from
the mayor. It's been said, remember, that Harrington wanted to build his new
park on the waterfront from the start -- but was directed back to the Fenway by
Menino. That plan is now crumbling. Does Menino have what it takes to push a
new plan into place? Can he set aside his grudge against Boston City Council
president Jimmy Kelly and rework the waterfront plan to include a ballpark and
shorten those 300-foot buildings? Can he set aside his grudge against McCourt
to do the same? Or will he stubbornly insist on keeping the Sox in the Fenway,
to the point that a new owner packs up the team and leaves?
Mayor James Michael Curley is remembered for building Boston City Hospital.
Mayor John B. Hynes initiated the "new Boston" by getting the Prudential Center
development off the ground. Mayor John Collins brought the "new Boston" concept
to fruition. Mayor Kevin White built Faneuil Hall Marketplace, which became a
national model for revitalizing downtown urban spaces. Mayor Ray Flynn will be
remembered not only as a champion of the neighborhoods, but also as ambassador
to the Vatican. What does Mayor Menino want to be remembered for? Revitalizing
the waterfront, and creating a new downtown neighborhood in the process? Or
caving in to developers' demands and "Manhattanizing" the Boston skyline, while
driving the Red Sox out of town?
Susan Ryan-Vollmar can be reached at svollmar[a]phx.com.