Creative tension
Cambridge boasts one of the most creative communities in the region. But a band
of merry pranksters says public art is feeling the squeeze.
Culture Watch by Jason Gay
Alan Nidle looks confused. It's quarter to nine on a warm Friday night, and a
crowd is gathering in the parking lot at Carberry's bakery for the kickoff of a
summerlong outdoor film series in Cambridge's Central Square. Tonight's film is
All the King's Men, and Nidle, the series' bearded, bespectacled
organizer, is trying to get into costume as Willie Stark, the flamboyant
politician character inspired by Huey "the Kingfish" Long. He's wearing the
trademark white suit, of course, and the white hat and tie, but he's got a
problem with his final sartorial item: spats.
"I have no idea how these are supposed to work," Nidle says, shaking his
head.
A few minutes later, however, Nidle has the spats figured out and wrapped
around his ankles, and he's bounding about the parking lot, twirling a cheap
cigar and firing up the movie crowd. "Welcome, ladies and gents!" he cries.
"We're gonna have an ex-or-cism! A po-litick-aaal ex-or-cism!"
People chuckle, but Nidle's Kingfish act isn't playing strictly for laughs.
Neither is All the King's Men, arguably the seminal fable of
20th-century American politics. For nearly a year, Nidle has been engaged in an
old-style political feud with Cambridge City Hall over its treatment of his
movie series, called the Wildlife Preserve, which offers such hipster-friendly
cinematic fare as Wild Strawberries, Earth vs. the Flying
Saucers, and Bonnie and Clyde each week from June until September.
The Preserve and city leaders have clashed over a range of issues including
noise, crowds, ticket sales, and permits. Last year, the city shut down the
series at Carberry's for almost a month, citing neighborhood complaints, until
Nidle and his colleagues could appear before the Cambridge licensing
commission, explain themselves, compromise with neighbors, and get a permit.
"The city nearly killed us," says the Wildlife Preserve's projectionist,
cartoonist Hans Rickheit.
City leaders, pointing to existing laws governing public entertainment, say
they're just doing their jobs. But Nidle thinks it's something else:
harassment. He's not alone. A small but growing number of Cambridge residents
are complaining that their city -- historically known as a diverse bastion of
creativity -- is becoming less friendly to public entertainment. In addition to
the Wildlife Preserve's troubles, there have been noise and crowd-control
disputes surrounding recent street fairs and ethnic festivals. At the same
time, some of Cambridge's street performers are complaining about permit fees
and selective enforcement of local ordinances.
Even some in City Hall detect an attitudinal shift. "For whatever reason, I'd
say we're becoming less tolerant of the diversity that makes Cambridge what it
is, particularly when it comes to the arts," says city councilor Katherine
Triantafillou.
Certainly, residents have a right to peace and quiet in their neighborhoods,
and few would dispute that reasonable regulation of noise and crowds is
warranted. "It's a balancing act -- there are residential and commercial
interests, and there are people who want to have fun," says Richard Scali,
executive officer of the city licensing commission.
But Triantafillou worries that the city may be going too far to accommodate
every single residential grievance. The three-term councilor says she was
"outraged" by recent complaints about crowd noise at the city's Greek-American
festival, which led to suggestions that the celebration be scaled back.
"I think there's an increased tension between those who want the city to be
more like the country and those who want the city to be more like the city --
people who gravitate toward sound, light, food, and excitement," Triantafillou
says. "Both sides view this as a quality of life issue. It's just a question of
which quality of life you prefer."
What's driving the dispute? Ian MacKinnon, a veteran street performer who ran
unsuccessfully for Cambridge City Council last year, attributes current
tensions to the "Giuliani drift." Cities around the country, he says, anxious
to mimic New York City's tactics for stimulating urban investment, are trying
to rein in sidewalk "nuisances" ranging from panhandling to food vending to
street performance. MacKinnon is particularly rankled by the city's decision to
raise its street-performer's permit fee from $25 to $40, and by the fact that
there are no public bulletin boards or kiosks left to post fliers.
"You hear a lot these days about the Manhattanization of Cambridge," MacKinnon
says. "I'd say there's a real home-and-garden-issues drive afoot."
These complaints come at a particularly volatile moment for Cambridge, when
many of the city's neighborhoods are experiencing sweeping economic and
demographic changes. The city's current development boom, abetted by the end of
rent control in 1995, has driven real estate prices skyward; older, low-income
residents (and businesses that cater to them) are feeling the pinch. Ground
zero for this transformation is Central Square, where a racially diverse
neighborhood known for its mom-and-pop outlets and dollar stores is
metamorphosing into a polished strip of eateries and shops more like
neighboring Harvard Square.
Nidle, who also runs the nearby Zeitgeist art gallery, worries that these
upscaling neighborhoods are becoming wary of public performance and art, which
can sometimes be loud and messy: "Instead of creating an aura of artistic
excitement, the city's trying to domesticate its art, domesticate its culture."
Cambridge mayor Frank Duehay, however, thinks these public-art battles are
less a byproduct of increased development than they are the result of poor
communication. Few residents are outright opposed to public performances and
celebrations, the mayor says -- in fact, most people thoroughly enjoy them.
When complaints occur, Duehay says, it's usually because neighbors aren't
informed about an event beforehand, so they get caught off guard by noises and
crowds.
"I think it's a matter of notifying people and explaining to them what's going
on, rather than having them find out about [an event] when they go to bed and
start hearing noise," says Duehay.
On the face of it, the mayor's position seems reasonable. And there is,
undoubtedly, a bit of self-righteousness to some of these performers' indignant
reactions to City Hall: when you get right down to it, groups like the Wildlife
Preserve think they're providing an important public service, and they don't
want to pay the city a single dime for a permit. They're even more reluctant to
jump through hoops for city leaders, even if those hoops seem reasonable.
MacKinnon points out that city standards used to be much more rigid: in the
1960s, street performers were required to audition for city officials, who
decided whether they were worthy of a permit.
Still, Nidle and the Wildlife Preserve continue to thumb their noses at City
Hall by insisting that their film series represents a political benefit for the
newly created Art and Performance Party, not a business enterprise. This allows
organizers to circumvent the $40 fee for an entertainment license, since they
are not profiting from ticket sales and, technically, collect voluntary
contributions at the door instead of charging admission. (Nidle explains that
he is mulling a city council run in 1999, and there's even a voter registration
table at the door.)
But, to their credit, Nidle and his colleagues are fighting City Hall with
their tongues firmly in cheek. When Friday's showing of All the King's
Men concludes, Nidle runs to the front of the parking-lot theater in his
Kingfish costume and begs the crowd to follow him down to City Hall for an
old-fashioned torch-light parade and protest. "We're not gonna play by their
rules!" he shouts in a faux Southern drawl.
It's getting close to midnight, and the groggy movie audience seems slightly
perplexed by Nidle's invitation. But soon, actual torches appear, and with
MacKinnon dressed in a tiger costume and Andrew Hoffman (son of Abbie) toting a
plastic machine gun as one of the Kingfish's armed guards, a makeshift mob
leaves Carberry's for the five-minute walk to Cambridge City Hall.
It's quite a scene. Pierced punk-rockers at outdoor cafés look up from
their lattes and homeless people shout encouragement as Nidle strolls down Mass
Ave followed by his corps of torch-carrying merry pranksters, who are now
joined by a trombonist playing New Orleans-flavored jazz. A wild-eyed
gray-haired man, apparently under the impression that this truly is an
angry mob set on burning down City Hall, joins the parade and proceeds to
scream invective about virtually every Cambridge public official to hold office
in the past 25 years.
Nidle stops the crowd in front of City Hall's front steps and waves a torch
back and forth. "The city tried to shut us down!" he shouts. "They tried to
shut us down but we wouldn't let 'em." A Cambridge police cruiser pulls up
alongside the crowd, and a pair of patrolmen eyeball the scene. MacKinnon,
noting the elderly-housing complex next door, tells the loud mob to take it
down a notch. "Senior citizens across the street!" he says. "Do not alienate
the core voting group!"
The rally is over within minutes, and as the police cruiser pulls away into
the night, Nidle, MacKinnon, and the Wildlife Preservers dance their way back
to Carberry's to the accompaniment of another trombone solo. Watching them, it
becomes clear that while the artistic community of Cambridge might not win all
its battles with City Hall, it's certainly going to have plenty of fun
trying.
"We're just troublemakers right now," Nidle says. "We're just trying to loosen
things up and see how much we can get away with."
Jason Gay can be reached at jgay[a]phx.com.