The art of education
For a new Boston high school, the arts aren't just an extra -- they're a tool
to get kids into college. Even if the kids have never performed before.
by Alicia Potter
Hurl Booth III doesn't seem like the kind of 15-year-old who would happily
spend his weekends at school, but here he is on Saturday morning, sauntering on
stage for rehearsal. Carrying a dog-eared script and wearing a
Marine Corps sweatshirt that says PAIN IS TEMPORARY. PRIDE IS FOREVER, he takes
a seat at center stage.
Hurl Booth is a rising star. Last year, the sophomore was plucked from
among 240 kids who auditioned for the 160 spots at the Boston Arts Academy, the
city's new public high school for the visual and performing arts. This fall, he
landed a plum role -- Papa -- in the theater program's adaptation of Art
Spiegelman's Holocaust comic book Maus. Tonight, when the play opens,
he'll put a semester's worth of work to the test.
"Some people say, well, [theater] is sort of gay," says Booth, who aspires to
be a comedian. "I have to explain to them that this is what I want to do, that
this can get me to a part of my life where I can be successful."
Booth exudes a certain magnetism. He has an expressive face and an easygoing
confidence that seem natural for a performing-arts student. Yet for those
weaned on the leg-warmered world of Fame, where everyone seemed to be an
adolescent Mozart or Markova, Booth's theatrical résumé might
seem a bit, well, short.
Booth, who grew up in Dorchester, didn't spend his grade-school days
incubating in community theater. He wasn't even in the drama club. In fact,
save for a walk-on part in a junior-high production of Romeo and
Juliet, Maus is his first play.
His new school, the three-month-old Boston Arts Academy, is an experiment: an
arts-oriented public high school that isn't just a staging ground for
performers and artists, but rather a college-prep school that uses arts as the
basis of its curriculum. As a result, the academy does not, like New York's
LaGuardia High School of the Performing Arts (the inspiration for
Fame), cull just the cream of the crop. Rather, it mixes experienced
young artists with kids such as Booth, who exhibit raw, untapped ability. Still
others are accepted not so much for their potential as for their passion.
It's not hard to see the risk in this approach. It could put stars in the
wrong eyes. And in the increasingly competitive world of selective colleges,
high-school arts classes are seen as irrelevant by some admissions officers. So
if the Boston Arts Academy isn't grooming a school full of Mariah Careys and
Yo-Yo Mas, then what is it doing? Proponents say it's getting kids interested
in learning in a way they've never experienced before. They also say it's
producing well-rounded students with a love of the arts -- one that
administrators hope kids will nurture long after graduation, no matter what
careers they pursue.
For now, such big-picture concerns hardly trouble Hurl Booth. He's more
worried about learning his lines -- and escaping the wrath of drama teacher
Rosalind Thomas Clark.
"Hurl!" she snaps, her precise British accent straightening his spine like a
drill instructor's bark. "I need to hear you! Project!"
Booth repeats his line, this time almost yelling.
"That's better," Thomas Clark says, then addresses the group. "Let's try it
again." With that, the Nazis square their shoulders; the Jews slump with
despair. Booth scribbles a notation in his well-worn script.
"Lights!" shouts Thomas Clark. "And action!"
When it opened its doors in September, across the street from Gate B
of Fenway Park, the Boston Arts Academy ended 15 years of false
starts and speculation that it would never happen at all. Although Boston
boasts a world-class ballet, art museum, and symphony, it has been one of the
last major cities in the country to launch such a school.
In 1984, the city's arts colleges began collectively to consider the need for
a high school focused on the arts. The Professional Arts ("Pro Arts")
Consortium -- an alliance of the Massachusetts College of Art, the Boston
Conservatory, the School of the Museum of Fine Arts, the Boston Architectural
Center, Berklee College of Music, and Emerson College -- was already working
with secondary schools across the state to drum up interest in college-level
art. The creation of an arts high school in Boston seemed like the next logical
step: a "feeder" of young talent right in the colleges' own backyard.
Yet the '80s were not kind to the arts, and the proposal to open a specialized
-- read: expensive -- school with an arts-heavy curriculum was repeatedly
abandoned. State and federal funding earmarked for arts education and programs
dried up; political support was inconstant, as superintendents and other
educational leaders came and went. Simply put, arts education plummeted in
priority.
The Pro Arts Consortium, however, remained intrigued with the idea, and when
the state passed its pilot-school initiative in 1993, approving the creation of
more-innovative public schools, the group's proposal was accepted. The Boston
Arts Academy was to be one of 10 alternative schools designed to revive
Boston's flagging public-education system.
But plans stalled as the academy, like other pilot schools, struggled to find
a home; its first scheduled opening, in September 1997, was scrubbed when the
proposed site fell through. Finally, the city bought the building at 174
Ipswich Street (which the academy shares with another pilot school, Fenway
Middle College High School) and financed a $6.8 million renovation.
The result of that renovation is four floors of shiny blue-flecked linoleum,
freshly painted lockers, and graffiti-free walls. The school houses a $135,000
state-of-the-art black-box theater (the only one of its kind in a Boston public
school), plus painting and sculpture studios, an art gallery, a darkroom,
editing rooms, and a video-recording studio. It's one of the most wired
schools in the city, built to accommodate computer and media-arts labs and
classroom Internet connections.
The Pro Arts Consortium connection means it is also the only arts high school
in the country affiliated with institutions of higher learning. The presidents
of the consortium's colleges now serve on the academy's board of trustees,
graduate students from the colleges have opportunities to student-teach at the
high school, and students from the academy are able to take college classes and
use the colleges' libraries and facilities.
Not surprisingly, the sounds that fill the halls of the Boston Arts Academy
aren't those of your typical high school. First of all, there are no bells:
academy staff wanted to give the school a more collegiate feel. In any case,
the students probably wouldn't have been able to hear them.
One morning, Lenny Kravitz's "Are You Gonna Go My Way?" rocks a practice
studio; "Silent Night" swells from the music suite; and down the art-festooned
hall, in the dance studio, an African drumbeat sets bodies in motion.
This isn't a typical day. Then again, there are no typical days at the arts
academy. The schedule varies, mixing traditional 55-minute classes with
two-hour blocks for arts studies and three hours a week of intensive writing.
Even lunch is different: four days a week, the students are allowed to leave
the school, open-campus style. On Friday, however, everyone must brown-bag it
or endure shoe-leather pizza and Tater Tots; that's "open mic" day, when
students perform for each other in the cafeteria.
The school's freshmen and sophomores (junior and senior grades will be added
as current students advance, for a full enrollment of 350 students by the 2000
academic year) devote about 28 hours a week to traditional academic subjects;
on top of that, they spend up to 10 hours of class time a week studying their
"major." Drama students learn about the history of Greek theater as well as
technical subjects such as stagecraft; visual-arts majors work on collaborative
self-portraits; and in the music and dance programs, kids use class time to
hone their technique. They're also exposed to professionals: recently the
theater students attended the Huntington Theatre Company's production of August
Wilson's Jitney and later participated in a scene workshop with the
playwright. George Faison, choreographer of The Wiz, gave the dancers a
hip-hop history lesson. And in February, cellist Yo-Yo Ma will conduct a master
class for the music program.
The academy's curriculum clearly stands out among the city's public schools.
But it also stands out among other arts high schools nationwide for its vein of
realism. "I'm not going to graduate kids who are illiterate in math and science
and can't write a coherent essay," says headmaster Linda Nathan. "I'm not
interested in promoting more starving artists."
The academic workload -- writing, math, science, Spanish, and a class called
"humanities" -- is rigorous and aimed at getting the kids into college. If
students do not have a B average in their academic subjects, then they
cannot participate in community performances. It's the artist's equivalent of
riding the bench.
But even the "straight" academic program is heavily saturated with arts
content. In science classes, kids create children's books and comic strips to
learn about the earth. Math classes incorporate writing and focus on word
problems. Humanities classes tie in other areas of learning; for example, in
conjunction with the production of Maus, students are studying a
curriculum devised by Facing History and Ourselves, an organization that
teaches young people about human-rights issues arising from the Holocaust.
"I had never heard of [the Holocaust] until this year," says Hurl Booth, who
last year attended Madison Park High School in Roxbury. "I was shocked."
By appealing to these kids' creativity, the Boston Arts Academy hopes to turn
out more-enthusiastic learners. It's a goal supported by a growing pile of
research, including reports linking involvement with the arts to achievements
ranging from higher SAT scores to excellence in math and science.
"Arts relate to everything kids do," says Kathy Tosolini, senior program
director of arts education for the Boston Public Schools. "[Education] can't be
about rote learning anymore. Kids need the analytical skills taught only in the
arts."
Researcher Shirley Brice Heath of Stanford University cautions that the
relationship between arts and achievement isn't as simple as "take an art
class, do well in math." Still, Heath's own 10-year examination of kids
enrolled in rigorous inner-city after-school arts programs delivers good news.
Released last month, it concludes that such students are eight times more
likely to win a community-service award, three times more likely to win a
school attendance award, and four times more likely to win an academic award
such as honor-roll recognition.
The study concludes that these arts-immersed kids raise their self-esteem and
willingness to take risks; they also sharpen their linguistic and
cognitive-thinking skills -- such as long-term planning, critical analysis, and
focused attention -- which they then apply to other learning and social
situations.
In other words, arts keep kids engaged, period. Heath sums up the effect:
"These kids don't have time to fool around or do drugs. Kids who can't focus,
focus. Kids who act out become more centered."
Take Diego Ribeiro, for example. At the Maus rehearsal, this
15-year-old, who has ideas about everything from inflection to stage-blocking,
stops to write Rosalind Thomas Clark's instructions in his script, pausing to
ask a visitor, "How do you spell kneel?"
Ribeiro can barely read. Since coming to the Boston Arts Academy, he has been
diagnosed with attention-deficit disorder and severe learning disabilities. He
was supposed to repeat his sophomore year at his old school, Boston English,
but instead he's doing so here, where he receives one-on-one attention. He
tape-records his lines to help him memorize them.
"Last year, I really didn't care," he says. "My teachers told me I was lazy
and stupid. . . . You can count more the days I didn't go to
school than the days I did. I probably would have quit in two years."
Yet Ribeiro thrives in theater. Thomas Clark reports that he's completely
focused: he sits through class, he sits through rehearsal, he sits through
two-and-a-half-hour plays. On top of that, he was one of two students asked to
perform for August Wilson.
Says Thomas Clark: "Because he is so smart and theater is his passion and he
wants it so badly, he will make it work."
Ribeiro has yet to skip a day this year.
Most kids in public school don't get this kind of chance, according to a
Department of Education study released last month. The study -- the first
national assessment of arts education in 20 years -- surveyed 6660 eighth
graders in 268 schools. It reported that even though most American schools
offer some type of arts program, only one in four students gets the opportunity
to sing, play an instrument, or participate in theater each week.
Seventy-four percent of the schools surveyed failed to offer theater at all.
Dance was so poorly represented that researchers couldn't find a statistically
significant sample of students. (Says Leah Principe, 16, who came to the
academy from Revere High School to study dance, "At my old school, the only
choice was to be a jock or a cheerleader.")
In Boston, according to the Boston Public Schools' Tosolini, arts education
has been in decline since the mid-'80s, when many school districts axed such
programs -- often instead of cutting athletics -- to save money. The result is
that interested students might never be able to take classes in their
strengths. Melissa Parkinson, 16, a visual-arts major at the Boston Arts
Academy who says she has been drawing all her life, reports that for the first
time, she's "learning about lines and contrast. I didn't know what they
were."
Says Tosolini: "They just cut everyone in arts like a red line on a budget.
They figured kids could get dance or piano lessons on their own."
Yet for many of the kids at the school -- products of tough neighborhoods like
Dorchester, Roxbury, and Southie -- after-school lessons were not an option.
Eighty percent of the students here are kids of color, and 20 percent have
special needs; four are deaf. More than 50 percent fall within the federal
definition of poverty.
Their backgrounds explain why the Boston Arts Academy, to serve the city
adequately, must be open to raw talent: most of these kids have never had a
chance to develop their abilities
As a result, when students audition (next call is in February), the school's
performing-arts directors must look beyond a shy stage presence or a lack of
technical know-how. Instead, they must look for "It."
"You can tell if they have it in their soul. . . . You see the
honesty," says dance teacher Fernadina Chan, the school's artistic dean. "It's
kind of hard to describe what you see in them, but you certainly see something
there that you like. . . . I think Martha Graham said it the
best when she said, 'Movement never lies.' "
To audition, the kids must write essays, submit recommendations, and perform
in classes where their skills and personal qualities -- motivation, work ethic,
community involvement -- are evaluated. The academy does not consider academic
records.
Though the school is home to some accomplished young artists (one boy has
studied with the Boston Ballet for eight years), Chan stresses that "experience
does not always equate with talent. . . . Sometimes we see kids
and can tell they've [had lessons], but their ballet is so boring, and their
technique isn't very good. But then you see a kid who is totally raw, and you
think, If this kid got some training, this kid could be fabulous, because she
has energy and is willing to take the risk to try."
This approach necessarily involves some risk on the part of the academy. What
if a kid ends up having two left feet? A tin ear? Chan agrees it's a gamble
sometimes, but she emphasizes that the school is not a "pre-conservatory"
school, a steppingstone to a position in a dance company or the halls of
Juilliard.
"I see this as a place for kids to experience a genuine arts experience, a
very broad arts experience," says Chan. "If they graduate and go on to other
areas in college, they're still going to be really good advocates for the
arts."
A quick poll of students found that fewer were interested in becoming
performers than in preparing for out-of-the-spotlight jobs. Many wanted to
study sound engineering, theater administration, architecture, law. There's
even one dancing nurse-to-be.
And what about the siren call of fame? Lakeyda Merritt, a 15-year-old music
major from Dorchester, looks at it this way. "Being involved in this school is
already fame," she says. "You have a talent, and everyone sees it. You are
recognized."
At least, you're recognized at school. Beyond the yellow-brick walls of the
Boston Arts Academy, many outsiders still consider arts education an extra, a
frill, the easy A.
Some college admissions officers think that way, too. When the National Art
Education Association, an organization for arts educators, surveyed a random
sampling of colleges and universities, it discovered that of those schools that
calculated the grade-point averages of incoming students themselves,
65 percent threw out arts classes.
Marcela Muniz, assistant director of admissions at Stanford University -- a
school that does not tally arts classes into GPAs unless they're
advanced-placement courses such as art history or music theory -- said, "We
note when [art classes] are taken . . . but the rigors of an art
class at one school may be different from another. It's difficult to know the
content of the courses."
Kathy Tosolini has her own interpretation of this statement. "What they're
saying is that arts are nice, but they don't count. I don't know where we lost
it, but we've lost the idea that being a Renaissance person is being an
educated person. In all this push to get back to basics, we lost the idea that
you need to know everything."
It's ironic that the very techniques that are getting public-school kids
interested in learning are not necessarily valued at the college level. Still,
headmaster Nathan considers getting kids into college to be the school's
foremost goal. To that end, admissions counselors at the Pro Arts Consortium
colleges consult with academy administrators to make sure the academic
curriculum is up to snuff.
There are signs, too, that the rest of society may be coming around.
Already, Boston's public-school system is integrating uniform standards for
arts curricula and has added 65 arts teachers to its roster.
"It's going to take a lot of work," says Tosolini, "but it's changing."
The Boston Arts Academy Winterfest
As the end of the semester draws near, the Boston Arts Academy is showcasing
its first student work at a weeklong exhibition, "Winterfest." The following
are open to the public:
Maus, written, performed, and stage-managed by the academy's theater
majors. December 18 at 7 p.m., December 19 at 2 p.m. At the
school's Black Box Theatre, 174 Ipswich Street. Suggested donations: adults $5,
students $3.
"Poputopia," an exhibition of pop-up books created by the academy's
visual-art majors. On display in the school gallery, 3:30 to 5 p.m.,
through December 23. Free.
Joint concert by the academy's dance and music students. December 22 at
7 p.m. at the Boston Conservatory Theater, 31 Hemenway Street. Suggested
donations: adults $5, students $3.
For more information, call (617) 635-6470.
|
For now, things have changed enough for the city to get the arts academy off
the ground, but not to fund it lavishly. As a public high school, the Boston
Arts Academy receives $6300 per student from the city's school system. But in
reality, the academy's annual cost per student averages about $8500. The
discrepancy -- not to mention phenomenal start-up costs such as two baby grand
pianos and a $100,000 air-conditioning system -- is left to the school to
scrape up through grants, fundraising, and corporate partnerships.
Most recently, the Boston Chamber Music Society signed on to perform a benefit
concert for the school; BankBoston is underwriting the costs for current
student exhibitions (see "The Boston Arts Academy Winterfest," right); and
the Harcourt General Charitable Foundation is donating books to the school's
library. Still, ask Nathan what the school's biggest threat is, and she
rubs her forefinger and thumb together: lack of money. "It costs three to four
times more to run a school like this than any other," she says.
For now, though, she pronounces the school stable. For these kids, it seems,
the days of drawing with broken Cray-Pas and making music with woodblocks are
over.
Back at the stage, the Saturday-morning rehearsal is winding down.
"I need the Nazis and the Jews to be quiet!" Thomas Clark shouts to a group of
kids giggling in the wings.
"What are you doing?" she asks one boy, who is sprawled spread-eagle on the
ground.
"I'm dead," he says.
Thomas Clark nods approvingly, then takes her place in the audience as the
kids work hard to focus, project, and ace their Polish accents.
"I alvays sink of her," intones one kid, in character.
Thomas Clark exclaims, "Good!"
At rehearsal's end, she gathers the group in a circle to assess the morning's
performances, wrapping up the pep talk with a reminder that "there are no small
parts, only small actors." The weary cast musters a round of applause.
For the more inexperienced kids, it's hard to imagine what opening night will
be like. The costumes. The lights. An audience of more than just Thomas Clark
and fellow classmates. Yet Hurl Booth has an idea of how he's going to feel.
"I'm going to be like, 'Yes, I did it! I got it over with!' " he says.
"When we perform that day, I'll know when I do good, and you'll see my
expression."
Tonight, Hurl Booth III takes his bow.
Alicia Potter is a contributing writer to the Boston Phoenix. She
can be reached at apotter@tiac.net.