PBS falls short
Public broadcasters have blown it on the hearings
Amid the tawdriness and the partisanship, the impugning of motives, and the
hypocrisy over sex and privacy, it is sometimes easy to forget that impeachment
is serious business. But it is, and the repugnant behavior of both the
president and his congressional pursuers does not diminish the importance of
what's unfolding in Washington.
In a time of such historical significance, there is nothing more important
than keeping citizens informed -- in as direct, unfiltered, and comprehensive a
way as possible, regardless of how few people in this strangely apathetic era
may actually pay attention.
Thus it is disturbing that public television -- the one electronic medium
available to virtually every American -- has chosen to cherry-pick the process,
broadcasting events that promised to have some sex appeal while skipping the
more tedious tasks of democracy.
Yes, the Public Broadcasting System carried the entire floor debate last
Friday and Saturday, including the vote to impeach Clinton.
But it skipped many of the House Judiciary Committee proceedings that led up
to Saturday's vote. It skipped the statements and votes of committee members on
December 10 and 11. It even skipped the committee's final session, on
Saturday, December 12, when legislators approved a fourth article of
impeachment and completed their misbegotten task.
From the Army-McCarthy hearings to Watergate, from the funeral of John F.
Kennedy to the testimony of Oliver North, television has excelled at creating a
sense of shared community during times of national crisis. Today,
unfortunately, network executives would rather send civic-minded viewers to
cable television, where the proceedings have been carried live on C-SPAN and on
the 24-hour news channels, than interrupt the flow of profits.
Trouble is, only about 70 percent of the country's nearly
100 million households have cable, and about another 5 percent have
satellite access. That leaves as many as 25 million households wholly
dependent on broadcast television, with taxpayer-supported PBS the only network
supposedly dedicated to people instead of profits. Yet the people's network
carried only three of Judiciary's seven days of public hearings and
deliberation: independent counsel Ken Starr's testimony, on November 19,
and the president's two-day defense, on December 8 and 9.
Stu Kantor, PBS's director of corporate communications, defends his network's
paltry offerings by arguing that The NewsHour, which produced the
programs, has limited funds and manpower. Kantor notes that in addition to the
three days of hearings, The NewsHour also produced a nightly one-hour
wrap-up and covered impeachment during its regular show.
Asked about PBS's obligation to viewers, Kantor responds: "I think the
obligation is to provide the information that people need to make an informed
decision." Kantor and other PBS executives may believe they have provided that,
but the lack of gavel-to-gavel coverage -- a striking departure from the great
events of the past -- was a serious misstep.
Locally, WGBH-TV (Channels 2 and 44) shares some of the blame. 'GBH did
carry one day more than PBS, running a raw pool feed on December 1, when
constitutional experts such as presidential historian Arthur
Schlesinger Jr. warned the committee that it was headed down the wrong
path. But that was the only exception -- and even when 'GBH has carried the
proceedings, it's only been from noon to 6 p.m., so as not to interfere
with children's, educational, and other regularly scheduled programming.
"The feeling is that we're providing the best coverage we possibly can right
now," says 'GBH spokeswoman Erin Martin.
That's just not good enough.
What do you think? Send an e-mail to letters[a]phx.com.