Alien ballot
A novel idea in Cambridge: Give noncitizen immigrants the vote
Cityscape by Sarah McNaught
Manuel Garcia feels cheated. As a young man, in 1984, he left his family in
Chile and moved to Cambridge to start a new life with his bride, Rosa. But in
the past 15 years, he's accumulated some complaints. He says he's been forced
out of his home by the loss of rent control. He's had to sit by and let others
make decisions about his daughter's education in the Cambridge public schools.
And he's heard many of his fellow immigrants complain that they get paid less
than their American coworkers even though they do their jobs just as well, if
not better.
Garcia feels that he has no recourse because, as a noncitizen, he cannot vote.
It frustrates him. "I have never broken the law. I pay my taxes. I give money
to almost every local organization that calls me for donations. And still, I am
without any say," he says, smoothing his hands over his shoulder-length black
hair. "I work hard and I give what I can to this city, but what do I get in
return? There are too many barriers here."
But that could change with the passage of an unusual initiative now gaining
momentum in Cambridge.
On January 25, the Cambridge City Council heard proposals from a
city-government task force formed last October to address the growing race and
class tensions within city government and the city at large. Most of the
recommendations were conventional -- racial-sensitivity training for city
employees, more minorities in upper management, and additional affordable
housing. But the task force also suggested that city government empower
immigrants by giving them the right to vote in city-council and
school-committee elections. If the proposal is approved, Cambridge would become
one of only a handful of cities nationwide to grant voting rights to
noncitizens.
This is not the first time the issue of noncitizen voting rights has been
raised in Cambridge. In June 1993, a grassroots organization known as the
Cambridge Eviction-Free Zone launched a "Campaign for Voting Rights" to allow
Cambridge's legal immigrants to vote in all city elections, even if they were
not citizens. According to the 1990 US Census, Cambridge has 21,350
foreign-born residents, 14,754 of whom are noncitizens. A 1998 Current
Population Survey shows that since the census, another 135,000 people have
immigrated to Massachusetts from other countries.
Laura Booth, who spearheaded the 1993 effort, says her group adopted
the idea from a similar 1992 campaign in Takoma Park, Maryland. "We learned
that a professor at a university in Takoma Park campaigned for a referendum to
allow noncitizens to vote and succeeded," says Booth, who now works for the
Cambridge Economic Opportunity Committee and is no longer affiliated with the
Cambridge Eviction-Free Zone. But after about a year, Booth says, the
organization dropped the voting-rights issue to focus on housing, which had
become an urgent matter with the demise of rent control.
It was Cambridge Eviction-Free Zone member Natalie Smith who took up the cause
again, suggesting it to the task force as a way to get more members of the
community involved in the class and race issues that are increasingly dividing
the city. "People who use public schools, pay taxes, and participate in
community activities should have a say not only in their children's education,
but also in how their taxes are spent," says Denise Simmons, the head of the
task force and a school-committee member. "We understand that some people feel
the right to vote should be a privilege only for citizens, but you have to look
at it from a participatory point of view." Expanded voting rights, she argues,
will give more people a voice in city decisions "and, in turn, show
city-government officials that all members of the Cambridge community have a
vested interest in the future of the city and its schools."
Other cities across the country have attempted similar initiatives. Chicago and
New York City have always allowed noncitizens to vote in local school-board
elections. And activists in Los Angeles and several cities in Texas and
Colorado are working to win noncitizen voting rights in local elections.
Internationally, countries such as Denmark, Sweden, Chile, Norway, and the
Netherlands have allowed noncitizen immigrants local voting rights for several
years, according to Booth.
And there is historical precedent. Prior to World War I, immigrants were
allowed to vote in local, state, and national elections in 22 states. Jamin
Raskin, the American University law professor who led the referendum effort in
Takoma Park, says that at one time it wasn't unusual for immigrants to serve as
school-board members, coroners, or aldermen. "Alien suffrage was a huge issue
during the Civil War, with the North in favor of it and the South abhorring
it," Raskin says. "It wasn't until the end of the First World War -- when
immigrants became darker, more Mediterranean -- that the outbreak of anti-alien
passions finished off the practice of voting rights for noncitizens."
Reintroducing those rights is an effort that must be fought on both legal and
political fronts. Massachusetts law says that voters must be citizens, but the
law is easily amended. After the initiative is discussed further at the next
city-council meeting, a public hearing will be held and the community will
vote. If approved, the measure will be passed on to the state legislature as a
home-rule exemption to the state law.
"It's something I would think would be accepted in Cambridge, as they
have many organizations that work closely on the issue of immigrant rights,"
says Kerry Doyle of the International Institute of Boston, a group that assists
immigrants with asylum and citizenship applications, job placement, and other
needs.
Getting state approval may not be easy, however, says Laura Booth.
"Basically, that involves begging [House Speaker Thomas] Finneran to approve
it, which we haven't had much luck with in the past," she says, referring to
home-rule petitions that Cambridge has introduced on other issues.
Cambridge is not the only Massachusetts city weighing this type of
proposal. On October 26, Amherst passed an initiative to grant local
voting rights to foreigners in board-of-selectmen, school-committee, and even
town-meeting elections. Now the measure needs approval from the state
legislature, which rejected a similar home-rule petition that Amherst filed in
1996.
In Cambridge, too, the measure's political prospects are uncertain.
Members of the Cambridge City Council did not comment on the proposal at their
January 25 session but instead opted to table the discussion until their next
meeting. But the idea has increasing support from the immigrant
community. Oscar Chacon, a Salvadoran immigrant who has been a US
citizen for eight years, says it is time for the government to acknowledge that
noncitizen immigrants are suffering taxation without representation.
"To the extent that we pay taxes equally, we should also have the right to
choose the public officials who administer our taxes," says Chacon, the
executive director of the Cambridge-based Centro Presente, an organization
geared toward immigrant civic activism. And he is confident that immigrants --
unlike many native-born citizens -- would use their voting rights. "I do
believe there are more immigrants interested in voting than Americans right
now," Chacon says. "I can assure you that the percentage of noncitizens voting
in city elections would be higher than citizen votes when it comes to such
things as ballot questions, which oftentimes involve immigrant issues such as
wages and housing."
Noncitizen immigrants in Cambridge remain hopeful. "My children attend the
public schools, so I should have a say in choosing those people who oversee how
the Cambridge school system is run," says Salvador Hernandez, 40, a Centro
Presente employee from El Salvador who has applied for asylum. "Similarly, I
have the responsibility to pay taxes, so why can't I have the privilege of
contributing to how those taxes are spent?"
Hernandez admits that language is a barrier for him and other immigrants who
have not mastered English. But, he says, there is no reason why voting
instructions and ballot questions can't be made multilingual. "Some say
immigrants keep to themselves and probably wouldn't vote anyway, but voting and
the barriers that keep us from voting are very large issues among the immigrant
community," says Hernandez. "We do care, and we do have opinions just like
anyone else. That's why we moved here."
Sarah McNaught can be reached at smcnaught[a]phx.com.