Cannes goods
Was this year's jury in the dark?
CANNES -- They have an unqualified love for Jerry Lewis, Mickey Rourke, and
American "B" cult directors. But why, LA moguls growl, are the French so
hostile to mainstream, market-driven Hollywood? The annual Cannes Film Festival
is regarded as especially snobby, its Competition adverse to even the snazziest
studio product. It's been four years since Cannes's director, Gilles Jacob, has
set foot in LaLa land.
For Cannes 2000, American execs were unanimous that Gladiator would have
provided for an awesome opening night. And why not a closing night of Tom
Cruise and Mission: Impossible 2? Instead, the 53rd Cannes Fest went
stubbornly Francophone, choosing to begin with a tired Gérard
Depardieu-starring costumer, Vatel, and concluding with Stardom,
a funny but superficial satire on the fashion industry by Quebec's Denys
Arcand. That neither of those films was distinguished fueled the American
ire.
Shouldn't upbeat Hollywood be paranoid? Jacob has appointed jury presidents who
routinely encourage their colleagues to award Cannes's prestigious grand prize,
the Palme d'Or, to difficult, downbeat European art movies. The Martin
Scorsese-led 1998 jury went for Theo Angelopoulos's Eternity and a Day.
The infamous David Cronenberg-led 1999 jury, which gave not a single prize to
the seven American films in Competition, saved its Golden Palm for the tiny
Belgian film Rosetta.
For the year 2000, Luc Besson was Hollywood's Great White Hope. Here was a
Cannes jury president who has made action films with spectacle and special
effects and aimed at popular audiences: Nikita, The Big Blue,
The Fifth Element, the recent The Messenger: The Story of Joan of
Arc. Besson is the most Hollywood of French filmmakers, so maybe he would
push his jury (Jeremy Irons, Kristin Scott Thomas, Jonathan Demme, et
al.) to honor the American-star-filled big-budget pictures premiering in
the Competition: the Coen Brothers' O Brother, Where Art Thou?, James
Ivory's The Golden Bowl, James Gray's The Yards, and Neil
LaBute's Nurse Betty.
On the other hand, serious critics at Cannes, including Americans (including
highbrow me), viewed Besson's presidency with trepidation, fearing he would
take a philistine, anti-intellectual approach to his jurying. At an opening-day
press conference, a journalist asked him whether his jury could support the
typical Cannes winner, a cerebral movie that has trouble attracting an
audience. "I actually don't agree with you," Besson replied. "If you look at
the Palm winners of the last 30 years, you see that many were popular,
successful films. For the broader public, the Palm choices are a little signal:
these are the films we want to highlight. Look at Rosetta, which won
last year and which was a great success."
Eleven days and 23 Competition films later, Luc Besson's jury announced its
winners at a short, elegant closing-night ceremony. The verdict? It must be
said that the choices were reasonable and intelligent, pleasing to most
factions, and appeasing to most of Besson's critics.
The Special Jury Prize was shared by two demanding, offbeat works, Samira
Makhmalbaf's Blackboards (Iran) and Roy Andersson's Songs from the
Second Floor (Sweden). Best Actor went, appropriately, to Hong Kong
superstar Tony Leung, for Wong Kar-Wai's In the Mood for Love. Taiwan's
Edward Yang won Best Director for the three-hour film admired by practically
everyone, Yi Yi/A One and a Two. Even Hollywood got something, Best
Screenplay for the zesty screwball comedy writing of John C. Richards and James
Flamberg in Nurse Betty.
With everybody fairly happy, the Besson jury could go wild and controversial,
giving Lars von Trier's much-debated Dancer in the Dark the Palme d'Or
and its Icelandic pop-music star, Björk, the Best Actress award. Mostly
cheers, but many jeers.
British critics and many Americans (me among them) found the movie maudlin and
clumsily shot, the narrative implausible, and Björk's performance fatally
unprofessional. Variety called Dancer in the Dark "a nearly
2-1/2-hour demo of auteurist self-importance that's artistically bankrupt on
almost every level." But Trier, who's most famous for Breaking the Waves
(his 1998 Dogma film, The Idiots, is opening at the Coolidge Corner this
week), is the Prince of Denmark for European critics, especially those crazy
French, who went mad for this faux musical instant "masterpiece." They
adored the musical numbers and Trier's jerky handheld camera; they defended the
melodrama by invoking Brecht and Sirk.
What's it about? Björk portrays a Czech factory girl who's living in
Washington (the state) in the 1960s and playing Maria in an amateur production
of The Sound of Music. Although she's going blind herself, she hides
away money for an operation to save her 12-year-old son's sight. But tragedy
ensues, and she's put on trial for murder. Found guilty, she could be hanged.
Earlier in the week, I'd squeezed into the packed press conference for
Dancer in the Dark. Trier was there, and co-star Catharine Deneuve, who
plays an improbable assembly-line worker. Missing was Björk, though she
was somewhere in Cannes. This was the final disruption of Trier's project by
the former Ice Cube. During the shooting, she ran away from the set for days at
a time, leaving cast and crew hanging. Flanked by lawyers, she threatened to
pull out of the production in the middle.
Had Björk gone bonkers? There were piles of stories circulating about her
erratic behavior on the shoot. One weird, unverified rumor was that someone
walked in on her one day as she was trying to eat her costume.
"It has been terrible," Trier admitted about working with Björk, whom he
had cast after watching several of her music videos. "I found out that
Björk is not an actor, which was a surprise to me, because she's so
professional. But she was not acting, she was feeling everything that happened
to her in the story, and reacting to it, which was extremely hard for her, hard
for everybody. She was like a dying person . . . but I'm pleased
with what she did. It was the only way she could do it."
Deneuve agreed, lecturing the press about its obsession with Björk's
antics. "I think it would be perverse to concentrate on what's behind the
scenes. No film goes without tension, crying sometimes. Björk is a
wonderful, touching person. She didn't act, she was like a child who couldn't
take anymore and runs away from school. . . . She's absolutely
unique. Very very different, very shy. To come here today with so many people,
she'd see this as a kind of crucifixion."
For the closing-night ceremony, Björk did appear, even walking up Cannes's
famed red carpet with Trier. She looked dazed and suspicious, even as she
accepted the Best Actress award with a two-sentence speech: "I am very
grateful, Thank you very much." It was Trier who reached out to her --
dramatically, melodramatically -- upon accepting the Palme d'Or: "I have to say
thanks to Björk, and she doesn't believe me when I say it, but if you see
her, tell her I love her very much." A few seconds later, Björk stumbled
to the stage and stood by her director. They didn't dare hug, there were no
Oscar-type tears, but it was, I suppose, some kind of rapprochement.
Okay, let's talk about the American presence at Cannes. The best-liked film by
far in Competition was Nurse Betty, in which Renée Zellweger
plays a sweet-tempered, Doris Day-like waitress who after her sleazoid
husband's murder by hitmen (Morgan Freeman, Chris Rock) takes to the road in
search of her real love, a TV soap-opera doctor (Greg Kinnear). The ensemble is
winning, and so is the delicate direction by Neil LaBute, who's infamous for
his misogynist/misanthropist duo of In the Company of Men and Your
Friends & Neighbors.
The Coen Brothers' O Brother, Where Art Thou?, a comedy romp through the
1930s South with three convicts on the run (George Clooney, John Turturro, Tim
Blake Nelson), was funny in parts, exhausted in its final act, and more
distinguished for its superb soundtrack of blues and early country music than
for its unambitious narrative. Minor Coens, though Clooney with a moustache
holds the screen in a charismatic, Clark Gable-like performance.
The Merchant Ivory The Golden Bowl was a film I quite admired -- this
may be as good as Henry James's impossibly complex novel can get on screen.
Nick Nolte is great as Sam Verver, a turn-of-the-century robber baron, a
gentler, kinder Citizen Kane. But many who saw the film at Cannes found it cold
and dispassionate, and they objected to the casting of too-modern Uma Thurman
as the tormented, petulant Charlotte Stant. I thought she was okay.
James Gray's The Yards, his follow-up to the fine 1994 gangster film
Little Odessa, was booed at the press screening and criticized for the
cliché'd familiarity of its crime story: young Mark Wahlberg exits
prison determined to go straight but gets embroiled with the wrong friend
(Joaquin Phoenix) and the wrong relative (James Caan). He's back in trouble
with the law. Gray's script is amiss, but his direction is nicely moody and
European.
And outside of Competition? John Waters's Cecil B. Demented, in which a
coven of underground movie freaks kidnap a superbitch Hollywood star (Melanie
Griffith) during a Baltimore visit, is genial and sometimes extremely funny --
i.e., the machine-gunning of a multiplex where the mainstream audience
watches Patch Adams: The Director's Cut -- but the climactic scenes are
disappointing.
Darren Aronofsky's Requiem for a Dream is a much-accomplished follow-up
to Pi, and let's hope there's an audience willing to brave the
in-your-face visual onslaught of TV-induced and downer-pill madness (Ellen
Burstyn is the victim) and heroin addiction (Jared Leto, Jennifer Connelly),
all from an extreme novel by Last Exit to Brooklyn's Hubert Selby Jr.
Ang Lee's Crouching Tiger, Hidden Target, the first foray by the
Taiwanese-born director of Sense and Sensibility and The Ice
Storm into martial arts, was probably the most popular film at Cannes.
What's not to like in this smart, sophisticated, spiritual tale with a cast of
Hong Kong icons (Chow Yun-fat, Michelle Yeoh) and thrilling swordfights in the
trees and skies, all enhanced by the technicians responsible for The
Matrix?
And the most overrated American film at Cannes? Girlfight, an
amateurish, overwritten, stupidly politically correct tale of a young girl who
becomes a boxer and, in her big bout, is matched against her boyfriend. He's
supposed "to learn" that it's okay to box a woman and that there's nothing to
be ashamed of if your girlfriend wins the fight. Yuk! What does it say of the
Sundance Film Festival that, last January, Girlfight was the rage and
the big prizewinner?
I'll stick with Cannes.
Gerald Peary can be reached at gpeary@world.std.com
The Film Culture archive