Local heroine
Cheers for Foley's Home Before Dark
Film critics turn thick-skinned when independents start wailing, "You've got to
see my film on screen! You've got to see it with an audience!" Sure, as if an
ugly-duckling videotape would improve when blown up and unspooled before a
live-and-kicking crowd. But then along comes the exception, Home Before
Dark, an autobiographical first feature by Cambridge's Maureen Foley,
produced by Michael Williams and David Collins of Boston's Scout Productions.
It's probably okay on tape, a well-acted little story that translates as a TV
find for HBO or Movie-of-the-Week. I was fortunate enough to watch it last
spring in a theatrical setting, a packed house at Boston University. And
Home Before Dark ignites in 35mm.
There were mammoth laughs over Foley's shrewd satirical jabs at growing up
Catholic in the 1960s and at the dynamics of playground friendships. And the
emotions in the room were palpable -- wrenching sighs, wiped-away tears -- as
Home Before Dark veered dark itself in its sad, affecting family story.
As in Foley's real childhood, a car accident wiped out several siblings, left a
home in psychological disarray, and forced a nice little girl to grow
adult-responsible far too soon.
Still, there's hope at the end of Home Before Dark, and the BU audience
responded to that, too. Cheers for a splendid, tender picture, among the best
features ever made in the Boston area.
Since I saw it, Home Before Dark has been sneaked twice, at the
Brattle's Festival of Women's Cinema and at the Nantucket Film Festival, where
it was the prestigious closing-night offering. What's more, Foley's movie has
passed the crucial test for a first film, a rave review in Variety:
"Modest coming-of-age film packs a wallop . . . "
Major players (Sony Classics, Fox Searchlight) are calling persistently. The
gutsy Scout producers have refused to mail out cassettes, insisting that, yes,
potential distributors see Home Before Dark on a screen and, it's hoped,
with real people in the seats.
Meanwhile, I met with Foley for a lentil-soup Cambridge lunch. A veteran
teacher of screenwriting at Harvard University's Extension School, she wrote
Home Before Dark with no thought of directing. But then she was told, "It's
your story. Why don't you do it yourself?" So she did, and her husband, Rob
Laubacher, a research associate at MIT's Sloan School, served as executive
producer.
A first film needs at least one bankable star; Home Before Dark
attracted, as a repressively mannerly aunt, Katharine Ross, the legendary star
of The Graduate and Butch Cassidy and the Sundance Kid. "She's
married to Sam Elliott, has an 11-year-old daughter, and wanted to be a mother
for a while," Foley explains. "She's not upset not to be working. She gets
offered plenty of projects."
A Home Before Dark script was sent to Ross in California on a Friday.
By Monday she had signed on.
Foley continues, "If you haven't directed before, you might want your
highest-profile actor to arrive late in the shooting schedule. Katharine
insisted, `I want to be there the first day. I'm doing you a big favor. It'll
help get things together.' She was right: Katharine's warm and cooperative, a
very good collaborator, and her presence brought everyone to their highest
level."
Foley's opening day as a movie director? "Driving to the Newton set at 6 a.m.,
and seeing about 40 cars, and equipment, and knowing Katharine was going to be
there, I wondered if I'd made the biggest mistake of my life. Should I turn
around and drive home?"
Over at the MFA, If Only I Were an Indian . . .
(screens July 31 and August 1, 2, 3, 9, and 14) is a documentary you'll enjoy a
lot, or only a little -- it depends totally on your sensibility. Seekers and
pathfinders, Iron John fans, and new-ager utopians will discover an
articulate Meaning-of-Life response to the failures of the urban world. Cynics
and ironists may balk, even snicker, at the same earnest images. Feminists
certainly will be wary.
Canadian John Paskievich has fashioned a typical National Film Board
cross-cultural documentary, flying three Manitoba-based native elders, two Cree
and an Ojibwa, to Czechoslovakia (it's 1991, pre-split) to meet with a group of
Czechs who have formed an Indian tribe. They live in tents, dress in loincloths
and moccasins, and are dead serious about the 19th-century Native American
life.
It's all so weird, but there are no laughs. The three Native Americans are won
over by the sincerity of the Czech Indian utopia, and so is documentarian
Paskievich.
I'm one of those skeptics, however, and I kept wondering why there are no
scenes showing any interchange between the male and female Czech Indians, even
the married couples. Braves and squaws are photographed, and seem to exist, in
separate provinces. Strange, even as the women explain how glad they are to be
recovering their femininity through squaw tasks: cooking in the ground, papoose
rearing, and sitting by while the bare-chested warriors roughhouse.
There is one chortle: a brave recalls his spiritual trek to Lakota country in
South Dakota, where he was laughed at because "Czechoslovakia" is close to a
Lakota Indian idiom for "greasing one's penis."