[sidebar] August 14 - 21, 1 9 9 7
[Film Culture]
| by time and neighborhood | by movies | by theater | film specials | reviews | hot links |

Sound of Stalin

East Bloc musicals: Singin' in the reign

[East Side Story] When Lenin declared cinema the most important art, he was thinking of anti-tsarist workers occupying the Odessa Steps in Battleship Potemkin, not a Black Sea chorus of top-hatted tapdancers. As we learn in East Side Story, a feature documentary that opens at the Coolidge Corner this Friday, it was Lenin's next-in-line, Joseph Stalin, who first spoke up for the film musical.

Maxim Gorky, the Soviet People's writer, coaxed his fearless leader to take a look at Russia's first venture into song and dance, the Hollywoodish The Jolly Fellows (1934). Censors had banned it, but Gorky fancied it, and Stalin did too, taking to the silly songs and the music-hall pratfalls of a cross-eyed protagonist who looked like Ben Turpin.

Even as he murdered millions of his citizenry, Stalin prescribed additional musicals, but with an overtly Communist bent: 100 percent dancing, 100 percent singing, and 100 percent Socialist Realism. These included Volga Volga (1938), happy Soviet peasantry rolling on the river; Tractor Drivers (1939), cheery Soviet peasantry slashing wheat; and the amazingly titled The Swineherd and the Shepherd (1941), in which a barefooted Soviet Cinderella sings as she feeds a chipper army of squealing pigs.

The Jolly Fellows and Volga Volga (Stalin watched that one more than a hundred times) turned director Grigori Alexandrov into the regime's favorite "auteur," though his detractors (undoubtedly closet Trotskyites) called him "the stupidest man in Soviet cinema." The socialist-realist musicals also made matinee stars out of their perpetual heroines, Lyubov Orlova (the city proletariat) and Marina Ladynina (the country girl) both of whom, writes a Soviet historian, were "blonde, had dazzling white teeth, and a simple, artless life-style."

When Stalin died of a heart attack, in 1953, the Soviet musical also succumbed on the pyre. Khrushchev didn't approve of them, and neither did any of the grim Commie leaders through Brezhnev: Shostakovich was better than Cats. But Czechoslovakia, Poland, Romania, and, most often, East Germany (the DDR) trotted out the old song-and-dance in cinema. About 40 Iron Curtain musicals were produced altogether.

The filmmakers of East Side Story, an American, Andrew Horn, and a Romanian living in Berlin, Dana Ranga, have managed access to many Eastern film archives; they have tracked down lots of these Communist-era musicals, which nobody has seen in the West. They should be praised for their arduous sleuthing. And it's reasonable that they should have first stab at a documentary about what they discovered.

Having said that, I'm greatly disappointed at the squandered opportunity. I don't know Horn and Ranga, but to judge from what appears on screen in East Side Story, they were the wrong people to produce the movie. They have only the slightest idea what to do with the immensely rich material before them, or what to think of it.

My litany of complaints:

(1) The filmmakers don't have a thesis except that people seem to get pleasure out of musicals, so Communists probably shouldn't have banned them. But doesn't that make Stalin the hero of the movie, since that mass murderer brought musicals to the masses?

(2) The filmmakers fit a type of plodding documentarian who has little feeling for narrative cinema, and absolutely none for the musical form. The musical footage they include is either illustrative of some point (and invariably cut off in the middle of a number) or shoved in there for no apparent reason. At no moment do we see song-and-dance chosen because it's beautiful, erotic, dazzling. (For that, you've got to go West to the MGM compilation That's Entertainment.)

(3) The filmmakers have no sense of humor, or irony, or camp. Lots of this left-over Stalinist hoofing and crooning is fabulous kitsch, but somehow, with the clumsy way everything is framed in East Side Story, nothing is ever especially funny, or enjoyable.

(4) The filmmakers are terrible interviewers. The ex-DDR performers and the Russian film critics who tell their stories should be having great fun complaining about the miserable musical days. Instead, they come off stiff and serious, surely because their off-camera interviewers are so grave.

(5) The voiceover is a miserable monotone of trite, obvious points.

(6) Hey, what about Romania? Two mini-clips from 1950s musicals are energetic and imaginative -- I loved those female trombonists with "film noir" shadows on the back wall -- but that's all we get, a tease, from filmmaker Raga's native country.

(7) Bulgaria? Yugoslavia?

(8) And -- why not? -- Albania?


The dubious winner of this summer's anti-jargon "Bad Writing Contest" -- held in Christchurch, New Zealand -- is an American film book, Signatures of the Visible, by Duke professor Frederic Jameson. His prize tome begins thus: "The visual is essentially pornographic, which is to say that it has its end in rapt, mindless fascination; thinking about its attributes becomes an adjunct to that, if it is unwilling to betray its object; while the most austere films necessarily draw their energy from the attempt to repress their own excess (rather from the more thankless effort to discipline the viewer)."

Well, kind of.

Gerald Peary can be reached at gpeary[a]phx.com.


| What's New | About the Phoenix | Home Page | Search | Feedback |
Copyright © 1997 The Phoenix Media/Communication Group. All rights reserved.