TOUCH OF EVIL, Written and directed by Orson Welles. With Charlton Heston, Janet Leigh,
Orson Welles, Marlene Dietrich, Akim Tamiroff, Joseph Calleia, Joanna Moore,
Ray Collins, Mort Mills, Victor Milian, and Mercedes McCambridge. An October
Films release. At the Brattle Theatre, September 18 through 24.
It wasn't supposed to be a masterpiece, just a solid commercial venture
that would restore Orson Welles's credibility with Hollywood, where he hadn't
worked in 10 years -- since his last studio-made masterpiece, The Lady from
Shanghai, bewildered everyone and bombed. Three minutes into 1958's
Touch of Evil, however, it was clear that Welles couldn't help himself
-- it was the longest tracking shot in history, setting up every element of the
brilliant, melancholy film noir to follow, summing up the genre of which it was
one of the last and greatest examples, and blurring the boundaries between good
and evil, duty and corruption, longing and loss that this film would forever
define.
That despite Universal's ham-handed recutting of Welles's original version.
Nonetheless, the newly edited release -- produced after years of painstaking
labor by Walter Murch and Rick Schmidlin based on a 58-page memo Welles sent to
the studio in a last-ditch effort to preserve as much as possible of his
handiwork -- is a boon to those who take the director, and film, seriously. The
changes are subtle but comprehensive, drawing one inexorably into the eddying
streams of narrative and the sourly claustrophobic setting. What at times
seemed eccentric now feels inevitable; it unreels like a seedy, shaggy-dog
tragedy.
|
The most obvious changes are in the legendary opening, in which two couples --
a rich American businessman and his blond bimbo joyriding in a convertible, and
narcotics officer Mike Vargas (Charlton Heston, in his best performance) and
his new bride, Susan (Janet Leigh, likewise) -- take their intersecting,
fateful paths through a dingy Mexican town and over the border to the United
States. Previous versions had credits pasted on; there are none now. Instead of
the jazzy Henry Mancini score, the scene is enveloped by the ambient sound
Welles intended, a cacophony of car horns, randy jukeboxes, bleating goats, and
a doomed car radio. Both soundtrack and visuals immerse you in a world both
ambiguous and inescapable.
Not that Vargas tries very hard to get away. When the other couple's car
explodes -- killing them -- just as he and Susan are about to kiss, his first
impulse is to send his bride back to their hotel and play policeman and
investigate. Separated, the two are at the mercy of evil influences, with the
intertwining of their divergent trajectories clearer now that Welles's original
cross-cutting has replaced the studio's clunkier, more "linear" editing. A
young tough waylays Susan and takes her to "Uncle Joe" Grandi (a menacing,
absurd and pitiable Akim Tamiroff), the brother of a druglord Vargas is about
to prosecute in Mexico City. In her spirited naïveté, she exposes
herself to Grandi's grandiose and sordid blackmail scheme.
Vargas, meanwhile, comes under the basilisk eye of Hank Quinlan (Welles,
hilarious and heartbreaking), the local police chief with a vendetta against
criminals -- his wife was murdered years before and the killer was never
caught. He's set on pinning the murders on Sanchez (Victor Milian), a Mexican
involved with the dead man's daughter. In another, even longer tour de force
one-shot sequence, Quinlan interrogates Sanchez and searches his apartment,
planting evidence to frame him. Vargas discovers the fraud, but the closer he
gets to proving it, the more he removes himself from Susan, and the more
vulnerable he becomes.
In a sense, Touch of Evil is the inverse of the standard film noir: the
femme, instead of being fatale, is the hero's one chance of redemption. The
villain's, too. In Quinlan's case, the love interest is his partner, Menzies (a
haunting Joseph Calleia, whose performance is enhanced by the new edit, most
notably the elimination of a crude reaction shot that debases his motivation),
a faithful dog with a canine intuition for rectitude. As Quinlan gets seduced
by the wheedling Grandi, their images are reflected on the window Menzies looks
through; he's resigned, disapproving, loyal.
Then there's Marlene Dietrich's iconic Tanya, the gypsyish proprietor of the
chili joint Quinlan haunted in his drinking days, perhaps a one-time flame, who
refuses to read the driven man's future. "You haven't got any," she says. "Your
future is all used up." That proved true for Welles with Hollywood. And as this
radiantly dark re-release demonstrates, the loss was mostly ours.
|
Lucky Leigh
Among the many distinctions of her film career, Janet Leigh might be
most noted for being featured in two of the most famous sequences in Hollywood
film history: the shower scene in Alfred Hitchcock's Psycho, and the
three-minute crane shot that opens Orson Welles's newly restored and
re-released Touch of Evil. The former is the consummate masterpiece of
montage, the latter of mise-en-scène. Both have been relentlessly
imitated ever since, and at the heart of both is Janet Leigh, film icon.
"Isn't that amazing?" says Leigh over a cell phone en route to the airport for
Toronto, where Touch of Evil is to be shown at the festival. "They're
both so different, you know -- it's like apples and oranges. But -- how did I
get so lucky? How did this happen? I'm higher than a kite right now, because
I'm just so thrilled at the picture's reception. I mean, each day, it just
seems to get better and better, and I think, `Finally! We're really going to be
able to appreciate the legacy that he left us!' "
Part of that legacy is the legend of the misunderstood genius, uncompromising
about his art and thus a persona non grata in Hollywood. But not to Leigh.
"Persona non grata? Not in our shooting. That and the two weeks' rehearsal was
a sheer delight! We knew it was innovative, we knew it was different; no one
knows if the public's gonna think so, you know. But we felt that we were part
of something that was historical."
The trouble came after the shooting, during post-production.
"Orson gave his cut. Then they made some changes, but he said, `I can live
with this.' And he went to Mexico [to shoot his unfinished independent film
Don Quixote]. Well, then what they did was they really re-edited
it, and changed much of the intent, many of the relationships, and tried to
make it what they considered at that time to be a normal, neat little package
of a B picture. And of course it was much more than that! Orson could never
make anything ordinary and had no intention of doing so. They didn't understand
that at all, this didn't fit the pattern. And then they started to realize that
maybe they were, like, in trouble or something, because it wasn't working."
So they started shooting new scenes, with another director, Harry Keller.
"We did added scenes, which were only what they called `clarification' scenes.
And they weren't at all; they only confused the matter. There was nothing I
could do about it. Charlton Heston had much more to say, as far as clout, than
I did. I voiced my objections, and that's as far as I could go. His stand was,
`I won't do these added scenes without Orson, the director.' "
Heston refused to shoot until he conferred with the studio head. They
cancelled a day of shooting -- which Heston paid for -- but it was to no avail.
When Welles saw the new version, he issued the now famous 58-page memo of
suggestions as a kind of damage control. That memo, when it finally resurfaced,
provided the basis for the new restored version, a labor of love for editor
Walter Murch and producer Rick Schmidlin.
"It's clearer and more suspenseful," says Leigh. "They have reconstructed, as
close as is humanly possible, without Orson actually being here, the picture he
would have presented to us 40 years ago. I have to tell you, personally, when I
saw it, I was so emotional, I just cried."
|