Jane for the '90s
Empowered women reign in Mansfield
by Peter Keough
MANSFIELD PARK, Directed by Patricia Rozema. Written by Patricia Rozema based on the novel and
letters and journals by Jane Austen. With Frances O'Connor, Embeth Davidtz,
Jonny Lee Miller, Alessandro Nivola, Harold Pinter, Lindsay Duncan, Sheila
Gish, James Purefoy, Hugh Bonneville, Justine Waddell, and Victoria Hamilton. A
Miramax Films release. At the Harvard Square and in the suburbs.
Repression takes scintillating form in the novels of Jane Austen; their elegant
surface doesn't require cracking to be enjoyed. She perhaps came closest to the
unstated evils of her world -- the sexual, class, and colonial injustices that
ensured the comfort of her characters -- in the lightly regarded Mansfield
Park. Its glimpses into working-class squalor, marital infidelity, and the
heart of darkness of the slave trade would probably have been submerged beneath
the set designs of another Merchant/Ivory production. Not so with Canadian
director Patricia Rozema, whose feminist agenda has inspired the playful
surfaces of films such as I Have Heard the Mermaids Singing and When
Night Is Falling. Her spirited, flawed, but ultimately triumphant
adaptation of the novel (and, mysteriously, the author's "letters and
journals") has its share of crinoline and courtyards but also toys with a
subtext of patriarchal tyranny.
Not that the book's heroine is much of a model for empowerment. At best a
passive-aggressive nudge in the original, mousy Fanny Price (Frances O'Connor)
is granted refuge from the poverty of her hopeless family by her rich aunt and
uncle, Lady (Lindsay Duncan, who also plays Fanny's mother) and Sir Thomas
Bertram (a chilling Harold Pinter), who enable her to move from her benighted
seaside hovel (if nothing else, this is the first Austen adaptation to include
cockroaches, not to mention nudity and hints of lesbianism and child abuse) to
the intimidating estate of the title.
Enduring a mildly Jane Eyre-ish upbringing, Fanny is slighted by her spoiled,
insipid cousins Julia (Justine Waddell) and Maria (Victoria Hamilton). But her
sensitive cousin Edmund (Jonny Lee Miller) sympathizes with her and encourages
her hobby of writing bodice-ripping romances -- not unlike those of the
juvenile Jane Austen. Also suggestive of Austen are Fanny's tart, irreverent
letters to her sister back home, which she reads aloud to us over satiric
scenes of life at Mansfield Park: Lady Bertram's nodding off from her opium
apéritif (a non-Austen addition); the meanness and vanity of her aunt
Norris (Sheila Gish); the alarming dissolution of her cousin Tom (James
Purefoy); and the overall luxury, triviality, and tedium of her adopted home.
Unstated by Fanny, but obvious to the viewer, is her deep, seemingly unrequited
crush on the strait-laced Edmund.
Fanny's cutting acumen and comments are a big departure from the put-upon
goody-goody of the novel -- indeed, she takes on some of the more charming
traits of the much feistier and entertaining Mary Crawford (Embeth Davidtz),
the effect of which is to render Fanny's character contradictory and Mary's
one-dimensional. A breath of vitality for staid old Mansfield Park, Mary
arrives with her brother Henry (Alessandro Nivola) just as the forbidding Sir
Thomas leaves with eldest son Tom to settle some difficulties with his West
Indies properties. Bored, indolent, and vaguely dissipated, the Crawfords seek
to spark up their dull rural stay by stirring up trouble with the natives. Mary
takes a shine to Edmund, and Henry, after flirting with her cousins, ultimately
courts Fanny.
She resists, to the incomprehension of all, partly because she sees him for
the cad he is. But the main reason for her refusal in Rozema's version is
Fanny's belief that an arranged betrothal is a form of bondage that reduces her
to chattel. This conviction is confirmed when Sir Thomas returns and she
discovers the real source of Mansfield Park's wealth and young Tom's
disaffection in the latter's sketchpad of his sojourn at his father's
plantation.
All well and good for today's sensibilities, but such a response does not make
much sense for a woman in 1804, no matter how ahead of her time. Rozema's
specifying of the horrors of Sir Thomas's West Indian estate and their parallel
with the treatment of women at Mansfield Park, though heavyhanded, is
insightful. Making her heroine an anachronistic mouthpiece for '90s political
correctness is not. Neither is her confuting the meek but unyielding point of
view of Fanny with the irony of the author. Such misjudgments undermine what is
otherwise an ingenious and economical adaptation of a sprawling and ambiguous
novel. After this peek beneath Austen's brilliant brocade, every other
adaptation will seem a little clueless.