Napster nation
Another community springs up on the Net
by Carly Carioli
One crisp afternoon last spring, armed with a copy of the Billboard
charts, I walked a few blocks from work to visit my little sister at Boston
University so she could teach me how to use something called Napster, about
which I knew very little except that it was supposed to be a tool, in the words
of a friend of a friend, to "steal all the music you want for free." At first I
dismissed the idea out of hand as being too ludicrously good to be true -- all
the music in the world, whenever you wanted it, flowing like tap water. There
had to be a catch somewhere. But when universities began blocking access to
Napster -- so many students were using it, and were downloading so much, that
they were causing the cyberspace equivalent of a traffic jam -- it seemed worth
a gander, and so I set out with piracy in my heart.
My sister Tia, as it turns out, is one of the vast numbers of college students
who are uniquely equipped to exploit Napster's resources. She has a sturdy
late-model PC with a built-in writable CD burner and high-quality outboard
speakers, the whole of which set her back just a little over $1000. Her
connection to the Web, by virtue of the high-speed lines with which dorm rooms
are now equipped, is extremely fast. Like many other college students, she has
relatively exotic tastes (faves: Blonde Redhead, Godspeed You Black Emperor,
Miles, Eno's weird side, Nick Drake) and plenty of time on her hands. She
doesn't have much in the way of disposable income -- but with Napster, lack of
cash is suddenly no obstacle to accumulating a weighty music library.
By the time I visited Tia, she and her roommate already had about 700 songs
stored on her hard drive (the result of a couple of months' worth of late-night
Napstering) in the form of MP3s: condensed, bite-sized morsels that provide a
reasonable facsimile of CD-quality sound in the form of files small enough to
travel quickly over the Web. More than a dozen MP3 players can be found to
download from the Web, many of them free -- Tia's pops up on her PC screen
looking like a digitized car stereo. Or, with a few keystrokes, you can use
your MP3 player to decode the MP3 files and burn them onto blank CDs, in which
case you have essentially set up your own miniature CD-pressing plant. Tia
played me a couple of songs from her hard drive: something new by Yo La Tengo
and a Dirty Three song. Then she played me the same two songs, which she'd
burned onto a CD, this time through her shelftop stereo: the difference in
sound quality was to my ears minimal. There's also software to reverse the
process: she can stick the new Belle & Sebastian disc in her computer's CD
drive and, using a program called Adaptec, have it converted, or "ripped," into
MP3 form -- at which point there's nothing to stop her from sharing it with the
rest of the planet.
Also, Matt Ashare examines the real problem with MP3s,
Douglas Wolk proclaims that digital-file trading is here to stay,
and Laura A. Siegel considers Napster's indelible effect on the music industry.
The Napster software, available for download free of charge at www.napster.com,
is a fairly simple program that allows you to trade MP3 files with anyone else
who is logged on to one of the company's servers. The servers compile a
continuously updated database of all the MP3 files on the computers of everyone
logged on at any given moment and then provide you myriad ways to navigate that
database -- you can search by artist or song title or album, as in an on-line
record store, or you can browse the libraries of individual users. At any given
time, my sister explained, you're connected to between 5000 and 8000 other
users, who have a combined library of between a half-million songs (on off-peak
hours) and a cool million (during prime time, which for Napster is usually
around 1 a.m.).
That day, when we joined the party, there were 5872 different people with
combined holdings of 726,823 songs. I took a look through the hip-hop singles
chart in Billboard and decided to search for "Whistle While You Twurk"
by a group called the Yin Yang Twins. The Napster console -- which looks and
operates not unlike your Web browser -- told me that four people had the song,
that all four song files had the same "bit rate" (an indication of sound
quality, with higher rates meaning better sound), and that each file would take
up 4.2 megabytes of disc space. Three of the four versions were four minutes
and 35 seconds long, but the last version was a few seconds shorter; of the
three full-length versions, one resided on the computer that had a very slow
connection to the Web. Of the remaining two versions, I picked the one with the
lowest score in a column marked "Ping," a kind of Internet radar that bounces a
signal off the user's computer to measure response time.
So I clicked on the low-ping version of "Whistle" and -- voilà! -- in
less than a minute it was ensconced on Tia's hard drive. (On a good day, with
the right connection, she can download a five-minute song in 40 seconds.) The
means by which this transfer occurs has become the focus of much litigation
recently. The song never actually resides on the Napster server: my computer
contacts this other person's computer and the song goes straight from him or
her to me -- or from me to him or her. While we were downloading "Whistle While
You Twurk," other users had begun to download songs from my sister's computer
-- as soon as you connect to one of Napster's servers, the list of MP3s on your
hard drive (or at least in a file you set aside for people to copy from) is
added to the master list of available songs, and in this way, as people log on
and off, the available library shifts and heaves and breathes. Soon, Tia's
console showed eight users copying tunes from her hard drive -- rare Nick
Drake, live Radiohead, Red House Painters, Pizzicato 5. Someone with a slow
connection was trying to download an obscure Brian Eno track -- with your
standard 56k phone-line connection, it can take up to half an hour to download
a single song -- and with a click of the mouse, we booted him out of our
library. Even in Napster's free world, hierarchies are unavoidable.
By now I could smell blood. I wanted to hit the ol' record industry right in
the gonads -- if you're gonna steal big, steal the family jewels -- so I headed
straight for the Billboard Hot 100 singles chart: Britney, Christina,
Destiny's Child, the Backstreet Boys, 'N Sync. The Top 40 was available almost
in its entirety -- in fact, if a song's on the radio (say, Sisqó's
"Thong Song"), chances are there'll be a dozen or more copies of it available
at any hour, day or night, along with remixes, edits, answer songs (Strings'
"Tongue Song") and parodies ("Bong Song"). Billboard's country, rap, and
R&B specialty charts fare slightly less well than mainstream pop and modern
rock -- most of the Top 40 rap and country singles can be found in abundance,
but you also tend to encounter fewer high-speed DSL and T1 connections. I
grabbed tunes by George Strait and DMX, Cledus T. Judd and Juvenile and the
Bloodhound Gang. My sister's roommate told me about a song one of their
floormates had discovered called "Fuck You in the Ass" by the Outthere
Brothers, a low-budget Miami club-pop duo, and in under two minutes we'd
located and downloaded it and were guffawing along with its bootacular whimsy.
The sheer mass of three-quarters of a million songs sprawled in front of me,
the echo of a great howling congregation swept up in an orgy of acquisition,
and in the swirl of digital commotion -- uploads/downloads, matches made,
connections brokered -- I had the sudden image of the floor of the New York
Stock Exchange, its harried and panicked roar, as if everyone could suddenly
own everything without spending a dime.
Metallica's Lars Ulrich has likened Napster users to shoplifters, and
that's exactly what it felt like -- it was akin to breaking into a record
store. Or like eBay without money changing hands. There was an illicit thrill
about it, as if a gate had been unlocked, as if an iron curtain had fallen. I
giggled: "Elvis and Cartman singing `In the Ghetto'!" I sniggered: "They've got
Mr. Bungle covering Britney Spears!" I cackled: "When did Nick Cave do `I Put a
Spell on You'?" I gasped: "Look look look -- Danzig singing Misfits songs with
Metallica!" The next thing I knew it was five hours later and my sister's hard
drive had expanded its library by about 50 songs. I could've continued all
night -- I hadn't even scratched the surface, and I still haven't.
For casual fans or hardcore record fetishists (who savor such things as
packaging and serial numbers and first pressings), Napster might -- as has been
suggested by the company's lawyers -- serve as a consumer resource, a way to
sample before buying. But for music junkies like me, it's is nothing short of
compulsion-inducing, at least at first. My sister recalled her first encounter
with Napster in much the same way that several other friends subsequently
described their own introductions: a period ranging from several days to
several weeks spent obsessively grabbing as much as they could, hour after hour
late into the night and early morning, following tangents from artist to
artist, song to song.
A brief and subjective glimpse: Black Flag's "Six Pack." Kate Smith's "God
Bless America" (the version generally credited with winning the Philadelphia
Flyers several Stanley Cups). G.G. Allin. Django Reinhardt. The Descendents'
entire Milo Goes to College album. Art Pepper & Chet Baker. Sixties
GI-garage-rock obscurities the Monks ("Drugs in My Pocket," "Nice Face, Shame
About the Legs"); Thelonious Monk; plainchanting monks. Songs called "Night
Train" by Wes Montgomery & Jimmy Smith, the Ventures, Oscar Peterson, James
Brown, Guns N' Roses, the Bill Black Combo, Boots Randolph, and Bruce Cockburn.
Vivaldi compositions performed by Yo-Yo Ma (with Bobby McFerrin), Wynton
Marsalis, Mike Oldfield, and an anonymous techno producer. A Rolling Stones
unreleased Decca live album from 1972. Freestyles from the Wu-Tang Clan. Forty
or 50 Anal Cunt songs. Eighties thrash kings Nuclear Assault covering Venom. A
bootleg of the Beatles practicing "Maxwell's Silver Hammer." Bob Dylan's
"Talkin' Bear Mountain Picnic Massacre Blues." Elvis stoned out of his gourd
and forgetting the words to "Are You Lonesome Tonight?" Prince and Miles Davis
doing "Let's Go Crazy" at Paisley Park.
Everyone, it seems, has two favorite Napster stories. The first is about that
initial, mad rush of discovery, like homesteaders staking out their 160 acres.
The second story is about some unbelievable obscurity he or she has downloaded
-- a white-label Slint live album, or Lowell George on the radio with Linda
Ronstadt in 1975. And the overall lure of Napster is something between these
two, between the overarching, all-encompassing nature of its enterprise (it's
got everything), and the personal specificity of singular buried artifacts
(it's got my thing). I know I have at my fingertips access to today's
Top 40 (and tomorrow's: as Madonna and Metallica have found out, upcoming
singles have a way of making their way onto Napster's lists before their
official release). But I also have a mental checklist I run through every time
I log on of bands who might show up (and occasionally do!) against the
prevailing odds of their making an appearance on a platform as
mass-culture-friendly as Napster: Teengenerate, Son House, Backyard Babies,
John Zorn.
If pop culture is fragmenting into ever-smaller sub-audiences, Napster seems to
be an agent for navigating pop music in an age where consensus is but a memory.
You could read Napster as a direct result of that fragmentation: if its runaway
popularity says anything about consumer desire, it's that the traditional means
that fans rely on to evaluate and keep in touch with the pop market -- radio,
MTV, magazines, record stores -- are failing them. It seems obvious to me that
the transactions made using Napster constitute a violation of at least the
spirit of the copyright laws -- if they didn't, we wouldn't be here. But the
major record labels have done such an exquisite job of squeezing profits out of
consumers and artists alike that it's hard not to think of this as payback
time.
Although Napster is unlikely to displace the industry, it does offer a
tantalizing glimpse of what ordinary people might choose to listen to if the
industry and its conventions didn't exist. It begins to smooth out the
differences in accessibility between such market-imposed distinctions as rare
and abundant -- Captain Beefheart outtakes and import B-sides are as accessible
as the new 'N Sync album, regardless of how many people want to hear them. The
prohibitive costs of manufacture, distribution, and promotion no longer apply,
since the only requirement for distributing music via Napster is that a single
person own a recording and be willing to share it.
Last Thursday it appeared that the RIAA had finally rung Napster's bell, and a
court injunction was in place to take the service off-line. With a mere 27
hours to go, Napster's servers were packed, and it took me a half-dozen
attempts to log on. There were 7000 users, 800,000 songs. I typed in searches,
frantic: Hellacopters, Gluecifer, Backyard Babies. Results, bingo: the Backyard
Babies covering Social Distortion's "Mommy's Little Monster" -- go, get it.
More: John Williams conducting the Boston Pops in the Battlestar
Galactica theme. Metallica's "Jump in the Fire" live from 1983, with Dave
Mustaine on lead vocals; Rob Zombie interviewing Glenn Danzig. I did a search
for Sonic Youth and found them backing David Bowie on a version of his "I'm
Afraid of Americans"; SY's collaboration with William Burroughs; Pavement doing
"Expressway to Yr Skull"; versions of "The Diamond Sea" ranging in length from
3:52 to 11:01; SY's cover of the obscure Nirvana B-side "Moist Vagina"; a live
version of "Schizophrenia" recorded in July of 1995.
When I logged off, there was a message on my telephone-answering machine from a
friend of mine. She'd recognized my screen name on her upload console. "You're
totally downloading Backyard Babies songs from me!" she gushed. It's easy to
dismiss the notion that a real community is emerging on the byways of Napster
amid the hustle, but this chance encounter, like bumping into an old
acquaintance in a crowded subway, seemed to confirm that a community is being
built, perhaps even in spite of the software's original purpose. For cheap
thrills, you can comb through lists of users and rummage through their
libraries, looking for their guilty pleasures, reminding yourself that people's
tastes bloom irrespective of the confines of genre and focus groups. The gospel
fanatic with Reverend James Cleveland songs out the wazoo who also has Beck's
"Sexx Laws." The jazzhead teeming with Ornette Coleman, Arto Lindsay, Dexter
Gordon -- and Juliana Hatfield. The black-metal fiend with the Christina
Aguilera house remix. Voyeurism reigns: you can listen to Courtney Love ranting
on a journalist's answering machine, or Fred Durst chewing out the band Taproot
for signing with another label after he'd courted them.
In just a few months, Napster has even begun to foster its own idioms. A genre
has emerged on its byways in which two different artists' hits are spliced
against each other -- for instance, Metallica's Anti-Nowhere League cover "So
What?" answering Britney Spears's "Crazy" -- in a manner that, however
frivolous, makes Negativland's infamous U2-sampling culture-jamming stunt
appear tame by comparison. Scads of novelty numbers and song parodies are being
produced on low budgets by artists who suddenly have a huge audience just a few
keystrokes away. There are some two dozen parodies in which Bill Clinton
impersonators are heard to sing pop hits -- "Gettin' Sticky with It," "Mo'
Booty, Mo' Problems." And that's not the only politics to be found -- there's
Winston Churchill's "finest hour" speech, Martin Luther King's "I have a dream"
speech, Marilyn Monroe singing happy birthday to JFK, Jello Biafra lecturing on
the subject of Mumia Abu Jamal. That, to this particular pirate, is the most
astonishing revelation to be found in Napster's cyberspace: the spectacle of
free music evolving into a new paradigm of free speech.