E-Mail This Article to a Friend Woody speaks Talking Match Point at Cannes BY GERALD PEARY
	More   » On the Web • Match Point • Woody Allen » Related stories • Power Point: Woody Allen returns to form. By Gary Susman. • Scarlett's letters: Johansson and Rhys Meyers lob a few. By Gary Susman.

Europeans are famously tolerant of even the weakest works of a heralded "auteur" filmmaker — which explains why Woody Allen has in recent Deconstructing Harry–to–Melinda and Melinda years accompanied some of his movies to Venice and Cannes to get a little respect. But even among Italian and French admirers, the publicity-phobic Allen just briefly addressed journalists in controlled settings. It was only with his comeback film, Match Point, which premiered at Cannes last May, that he felt confident enough to brave an old-fashioned open press conference.

"The film came out pretty well, I thought," he told a packed room of international reporters at Cannes, "and I’m usually a harsh critic of my own films. It’s a film about luck, and the film was permeated by good luck. I made it in London, where everything was wonderful for me. It was cool, the skies were gray, which was perfect. I had Scarlett [Johansson] and this gifted group of English actors, even down to each messenger in the picture. To an American, every English voice seems great. I edited in the US, and we were stunned by how every little part, even people who had two words, sounded wonderful."

Allen contrasted his respectfully hands-off English financiers with the increasing interference of funders in the US. "In America, more and more they don’t want to be thought of as ‘just a bank.’ They want to have something to say about the casting, they’d like to read the script, occasionally come to dailies. But I want the money in a brown paper bag and give them a film a few months later. That’s it!"

Why did he make a movie so deeply cynical, one in which the worst people end up on top? "My point of view isn’t cynical, it’s an accurate perspective. I feel it’s clear to every thinking person that there are gigantic emotional crimes, physical crimes, international crimes that don’t go punished, they’re rewarded. The tragedy of life is that so many innocent victims are slaughtered for some supposedly benevolent reason for mankind."

So Match Point is a kind of cousin to his 1989 Crimes and Misdemeanors, in which dreadful criminal acts also went unpunished?

"I would see no similarity between the two. This film has crime in it and that one had crime in it, but Small Time Crooks also had crime in it. Crimes and Misdemeanors was more religious, a different story."

But what about the 1951 film classic A Place in the Sun, which was based on Theodore Dreiser’s An American Tragedy? I asked about the obvious similarity, an ambitious young man after the boss’s daughter having to decide whether to kill his clingy, demanding girlfriend. "I’ve never read An American Tragedy. I’ve seen the movie and liked it, but to me it had no relationship whatsoever."

Hmmmm. Okay. And the on-screen showing of Dostoyevsky’s Crime and Punishment?

"When I wrote the story, it occurred to me that it echoed 19th-century Russian literature. I wanted to make a link, however tenuous, with this novel and my little movie."

And why at 70 does Allen continue to make movies? "If I don’t make them, I have nothing to distract me. It’s like mental patients kept busy with fingerpainting, they’re more relaxed afterward. So I immerse myself, keep out of the real world for a year. That’s more of an answer than you wanted for your little question!"