The Phoenix Network:
 
 
About  |  Advertise
Adult  |  Moonsigns  |  Band Guide  |  Blogs  |  In Pictures
 
Books  |  Comedy  |  Dance  |  Museum And Gallery  |  Theater
Nominate-best-2010

Reading is fundamentalist

By DAVID S. BERNSTEIN  |  December 22, 2009

Despite the success of these books, most mainstream publications — including the Times itself — have generally ignored them, declining to even publish reviews. That's understandable: after all, Where's Waldo? books have also sold well, and Coulter's Guilty and Goldberg's A Slobbering Love Affair are barely more worthy of the intellectual consideration.

But ignoring these bestsellers altogether is to miss out on what's driving today's conservatives — and in turn, the Republican Party.

The message these books carry, in fact, is that the GOP is failing to fight hard enough against the liberal agenda. The Republican Party, according to the authors, acquiesced in the growth of the federal government; failed to cast Obama and his associates as the dangerous, corrupt radicals that they are; and shied from calling for the rollback of the progressive gains of the past century.

And these bestsellers reserve much of their harshest criticism for moderate Republicans — Levin dubs them "neo-statists" — while almost every one of their authors proclaims his or her independence from the party.

This has the GOP running scared. The "Tea Party" outgrowth of the MCM now outpolls the Republican Party. At least two MCM personalities — Palin and Lou Dobbs — have raised the possibility of an independent presidential run in 2012. As this audience has become the dominant force within the GOP, party leaders have been forced to adopt, or at least tolerate, the nutty ideas used to sell products in the MCM.

So those paying attention to the MCM were not surprised this summer upon learning that millions of Americans believe that Obama is foreign-born, and thus, according to the Constitution, ineligible to hold his office. That's because this "birther" theory is argued at length in last year's number-one bestseller The Obama Nation, by Jerome Corsi.

Catastrophe, meanwhile, set the table for some of what you saw in this summer's town hall meetings. That book, which hit the top spot soon after its June release, devotes a chapter to Obama's secret "plan to ration health care." Its authors, Morris and McGann, warn that, if health-care reform passes, "bureaucrats . . . will literally determine whether you live or die." In early August, Palin turned this into the coinage "death panels" on a Facebook post. Democrats then spent the next four weeks dealing with the fallout. If they don't want to be constantly playing catch up, liberals will have to expand their reading lists.

0912_commonsense_mian
THEY PONTIFICATE, YOU DECIDE: The eight best-selling conservative books contain no original reporting or research.

Sowell's seeds
Looking for the most influential thinker among movement conservatives? Thomas Sowell is cited in five of the eight top-selling conservative books of 2009: Common Sense; Arguing with Idiots; A Slobbering Love Affair; Going Rogue; and Liberty and Tyranny.
Justify my hate
The eight top-selling conservative books of 2009 range from ideological treatises to personal memoir. But despite their differences, they have much in common.

Clearly, these books sold so well because they carry a message that many movement conservatives want to hear. What these books provide, in my judgment, is justification for the intense anger, hatred, and fear they feel toward Obama and the federal government — feelings that were deliberately stoked throughout the presidential campaign, primarily by the MCM. There are four steps in that process of justification.

< prev  1  |  2  |  3  |  4  |  5  |   next >
Related: , , , More more >
  Topics: Books , Barack Obama, Barack Obama, Arts,  More more >
  • Share:
  • Share this entry with Facebook
  • Share this entry with Digg
  • Share this entry with Delicious
  • RSS feed
  • Email this article to a friend
  • Print this article
1 Comments / Add Comment

TheMadKing

"Reading is Fundamentalist." How quaint and utterly predictable.

I expect the only thing that bothers you fine folks at the Phoenix more than the fact that conservatives can actually read is that it took eight years for the American people to fully vomit Republicans out of office, yet only one year for their stomachs to start churning in full again at the rank liberal progressive agenda that Obama, Reid and Pelosi et al are trying to shove down the electorate's throat. An agenda the American people did not vote for, by the way.

Might I suggest the roots of the problems for LibDems today, besides the proposed high taxes and stifling regulations being proposed in Congress in the midst of a recession and possible depression? It's the economy, stupid! If Congress and the White House put in even one-tenth the effort in creating jobs and putting Americans back to work as they are in trying to strangle businesses, bankrupt the country and kill even more jobs, Coakley could be out on a sailboat somewhere and mailing it in!

Until that happens, expect a lot more Scott Browns, Chris Christies and Bob McDonnells. What a difference a year in American politics can make, huh? God Bless America! Oh, I'm sorry. Can I say that here? I know it's kind of Fundamentalist and all...

Posted: January 16 2010 at 6:37 AM
HTML Prohibited
Add Comment

Today's Event Picks
ARTICLES BY DAVID S. BERNSTEIN
Share this entry with Delicious
  •   BAY STATE'S TOP LOBBYISTS  |  February 03, 2010
    Nearly everyone in Massachusetts felt the pinch of the recession in 2009 — even Beacon Hill lobbyists had to tighten their belts.
  •   ELEPHANT IN THE ROOM  |  January 27, 2010
    Platoons of state Republicans, energized by Scott Brown's stunning victory over Democrat Martha Coakley last week, are setting their sights on November.
  •   DISASTER, THEN DÉTENTE  |  January 25, 2010
    From the first days after the earthquake struck Haiti — long before anyone knew how dire the situation was, let alone how the US government would respond — pundits were wagging their tongues about the potential political implications. A poor response, they said, would invite comparisons to the Bush administration's bungled handling of Hurricane Katrina in New Orleans.
  •   HOW BROWN WON  |  January 22, 2010
    As the Massachusetts US Senate election unfolded yesterday, all that the pols and pundits wanted to talk about was how Martha Coakley managed to lose the race. And there is plenty there to dissect. But there is another part of the story, and that is how Scott Brown managed to win it.
  •   READY TO RUMBLE  |  January 13, 2010
    Last summer, the upcoming race that got most Bay State politicos salivating was the run for governor.

 See all articles by: DAVID S. BERNSTEIN

MOST POPULAR
RSS Feed of for the most popular articles
 Most Viewed   Most Emailed 



  |  Sign In  |  Register
 
thePhoenix.com:
Phoenix Media/Communications Group:
TODAY'S FEATURED ADVERTISERS
Copyright © 2010 The Phoenix Media/Communications Group