The Phoenix Network:
 
 
About  |  Advertise
Adult  |  Moonsigns  |  Band Guide  |  Blogs  |  In Pictures
 
CD Reviews  |  Classical  |  Live Reviews  |  Music Features
Nominate-best-2010

Blessings: mixed and otherwise

Boston Baroque’s Amadigi; Opera Boston’s Tancredi; the BSO’s Beethoven; the Borromeo’s Bartók; Brahms from BCMS and BSOCP
By LLOYD SCHWARTZ  |  October 28, 2009

10910_tancredi_main
TANCREDI It was Polish coloratura Ewa Podles (center) and Boston soprano Amanda Forsythe (right) who ignited this Rossini rarity.

By odd coincidence, in recent weeks we’ve had performances of two important operatic rarities, landmark early works a century apart: 30-year-old Handel’s Amadigi (1715) and 20-year-old Rossini’s Tancredi (1813, his 10th opera!). Both were hits, and both have been relatively forgotten. The coincidences don’t stop there. Both take place in the fog of legend (useful for scenic spectacle), and though both were based on previous theatrical works, neither one boasts the dramatic assurance its composer later developed. And both plots spin out interminable complications deriving from the way their heroes (both sung here by women) implausibly and catastrophically question the fidelity of their lovers. Neither Boston Baroque’s semi-staged Amadigi nor Opera Boston’s fully staged Tancredi offered satisfactory solutions, though both featured some outstanding singing.

Amadigi, according to MIT Handel scholar Ellen Harris, was probably a veiled allegory of political intrigue around the court of George I. I wish stage director Paul Peers had found a way to suggest there was more going on than magic and romance. Although he moved his singers into unexpected areas of the stage, and even the Jordan Hall balcony, his “semi-staging” (hints of costume but no scenery and few props) was more minimal — and flatter — than his Handel Xerxes last season. Amadigi needs more help than he provided. Tancredi had the opposite problem. Director Kristine McIntyre situated this essentially unrealistic mediæval romance during the Spanish Civil War, adding nothing but confusion (Who’s on which side? Who are the loyalists and who the fascists?), and so during Rossini’s sparkling, colorful score we were forced to look at the dreary browns, blacks, and grays of Carol Bailey’s set — a massive faux brick back wall (shades of the Met’s grim new Tosca) from which a huge (30-foot?) canvas rag was hanging and something that looked like the side of a pyramid — and ultra-drab costumes.

Amadigi got off to a slow start, but by the second act, the arias and (especially) the duets, all for high voices, began to equal the dazzling orchestrations and accompaniments — the latter including a particularly sumptuous oboe obbligato played by Marc Schachman, an aria with overlapping strings, a kind of bagpipe drone with oboe and bassoon, a magic spell with oboe and trumpet that Handel later used for his famous Water Music. Music director Martin Pearlman kept this all bouncing along. The playing was expert and elegant. And soprano Ava Pine, so touching in the title role of Xerxes, was perfect (in a slinky black sheath) as the villainous sorceress Melissa. Her singing was full yet effortless and beautifully textured. I was also impressed by countertenor Michael White (especially when his voice echoed from the balcony) and the solid soprano Mary Wilson. In the challenging role of Amadigi, mezzo Leah Wool was less convincing, both vocally and dramatically.

1  |  2  |  3  |   next >
Related: John Harbison plus 10, Baroque and beyond, Review: Emanuel Ax at Jordan Hall, More more >
  Topics: Classical , Entertainment, Music, Ellen Harris,  More more >
  • Share:
  • Share this entry with Facebook
  • Share this entry with Digg
  • Share this entry with Delicious
  • RSS feed
  • Email this article to a friend
  • Print this article
3 Comments / Add Comment

GUIDODAREZZO

Re the BSO and Fruhbeck: out of two and a quarter hours of music  Schwartz found worthwhile only the ten (twelve?) notes of the first oboe solo - a solo Fruhbeck coached note for note from the player? There must be agenda here; one only hopes it is a quest for column inches

Posted: November 04 2009 at 3:32 PM

Dan Farber

I heard the same concert Mr. Schwartz did. The short version is that BSO management, in taking on a very "safe" replacement, robbed its audience of Beethoven's "extraordinariness". Part of the reason that Mr. Schwartz and I found the concert so dispiriting is, no doubt, the lost opportunity of hearing what James Levine and his (now, once again) great orchestra would have brought to the table. Whatever else Levine is or is not, his way is never "routine". He at least offers something to argue with, and not the blank slate Mr. Fruhbeck offered in the first two symphonies and the cheaply-earned thrills in the fifth.
Posted: November 05 2009 at 9:47 AM

Anonymous

Forgive me, I guess I wasn’t clear in my posting.

I, too, heard the same concert you and Mr. Schwartz did. I don’t cavil with his or your opinions of Frubeck’s interpretation - de gustibus non est disputandum - although I thought perhaps his studied, and maybe, yes, pedantic approach was an attempt to present the First as Haydn’s 109th, with the Second less constrained and the Fifth all hell truly breaking loose. Surely the purpose of a Beethoven Cycle is exactly that sort of educational, big picture goal. I too was looking forward to seeing Levine approach all nine and hoping to see if he could present something other than his usual bombast. The BSO Management’s choice was not a “safe” one, but a desperate one, given the abrupt nature of JL’s absence and the advance scheduling of any conductor of stature. You would have prefered Kuerti?

My exasperation was with Schwartz lauding ten notes (six seconds?) played by one player of the orchestra as the only, brief, insight into Beethoven’s genius when from my spot in the balcony it was unambiguous that each note was dictated in pacing and even dynamic, by Frubeck, the very artist the previous paragraphs had disparaged.
Posted: January 25 2010 at 9:40 AM
HTML Prohibited
Add Comment

[ 02/04 ]   Leo Blais  @ Center for Arts at the Armory
[ 02/04 ]   Kristina Nilsson, Jan Pfeiffer, & James Chubet  @ Gasson Hall at Boston College
[ 02/04 ]   Michael Skinner  @ Perks Coffeehouse
[ 02/04 ]   DJs Real P & Radio P  @ Good Life
ARTICLES BY LLOYD SCHWARTZ
Share this entry with Delicious
  •   STOPPING TIME  |  February 02, 2010
    BSO music director James Levine has returned to Symphony Hall for the first time since October, when back surgery put him out of commission.
  •   LET'S ROCK  |  January 25, 2010
    WGBH radio has ended its 58-year tradition of live Friday-afternoon BSO broadcasts, and it doesn't seem that public outcry is going to change that.
  •   JOHN HARBISON PLUS 10  |  January 05, 2010
    Classical music in Boston is so rich, having to pick 10 special events for this winter preview is more like one-tenth of the performances I'm actually looking forward to.
  •   2009: THE YEAR IN CLASSICAL  |  January 04, 2010
    This was a queasy year for classical music.
  •   WANTING MORE  |  December 16, 2009
    After its triumphant traversal of the complete Béla Bartók string quartets at the Isabella Stewart Gardner Museum, the Borromeo Quartet was back for a free 20th- and 21st-century program at Jordan Hall, leading off with an accomplished recent piece by the 24-year-old Egyptian composer Mohammed Fairuz, Lamentation and Satire.

 See all articles by: LLOYD SCHWARTZ

MOST POPULAR
RSS Feed of for the most popular articles
 Most Viewed   Most Emailed 



  |  Sign In  |  Register
 
thePhoenix.com:
Phoenix Media/Communications Group:
TODAY'S FEATURED ADVERTISERS
Copyright © 2010 The Phoenix Media/Communications Group