The Phoenix Network:
 
 
About  |  Advertise
 
Media -- Dont Quote Me  |  News Features  |  Talking Politics  |  This Just In
fallpreview091511_1000x50

Inside the 9/11 Truth Movement

Who are the people who want to know what really happened?
By DEIRDRE FULTON  |  September 7, 2011

feat_truth_main
This week marks the tenth anniversary of the 9/11 attacks. Every day brings us farther from the events of that September morning, but still there are some who believe they are getting closer. Closer to the truth, or something like it, closer to a story they believe has been hidden for a decade, closer to galvanizing the American people to reject the official account and consider a more insidious narrative. They're holding international hearings to mark the 10-year anniversary. They're running television advertisements. The truthers? They're not going anywhere.

The so-called 9/11 Truth Movement encompasses a wide spectrum, from those who question certain aspects of the generally accepted US government account, to those who believe government officials lied en masse to cover up their own incompetence, to those who firmly believe that what happened on September 11, 2001, was an inside job. "[E]lements within the US government must have been involved in facilitating or orchestrating the attacks — in other words . . . 9/11 was possibly a classic case of 'false-flag' or synthetic terrorism, such as corrupt states have often perpetrated on their own citizens," it says at 911truth.org, the primary Internet portal to the truther universe.

That universe has grown since the days just after 9/11; what started as a motley crew of online skeptics is now a worldwide network of doubters, some of whom cite their academic, scientific, and political credentials as reason to believe. (Still, though, the Internet serves as their gateway and gathering place.)

There are the Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth (perhaps the most authoritative association of truthers), the NYC Coalition for Accountability Now (an assemblage of more than 100 9/11 family members, survivors, and first responders calling for a new investigation), Pilots for 9/11 Truth, Medical Professionals for 9/11 Truth . . . the list goes on.

And yes, there is a Maine 9/11 Truth organization. It's really just a website manned by one Stephen Shaw, a tall, silver-haired, lanky man from Brunswick. A professorial type, with a gentle handshake and speaking voice, who happens to believe, without a shadow of a doubt, that "our country is being run by the perpetrators of 9/11 and eventually they want to run the world."

Shaw, 56, is originally from Maryland and moved to Maine 12 years ago to help take care of his ailing father. He's got a degree in biology, has worked in several jobs over the last decade, and is currently writing a book on "the science of social corruption entitled 9/11 and the Logic of Social Systems." He is unmarried and close with his siblings; while he and his sister have a tacit agreement not to discuss this topic, he acknowledges that it has become something of a yardstick in his general social life — is someone "big enough to take this issue seriously?" he asks himself about the people around him.

"I have a sobering perspective to share," Shaw wrote in a Brunswick Times Record opinion piece two years ago, on the eighth anniversary of the attacks. "I have discovered that to openly reexamine the events of 9/11 is to be introduced to the possibility that the darkest Machiavellian logic may be at work below the surface of this powerful nation of ours. To probe the facts of that day is to discover abundant evidence of a fraud of mind-boggling proportions: that a faction within our own government must have been central to the planning and execution of the attacks."

1  |  2  |  3  |  4  |  5  |  6  |   next >
Related: Does Portland want an elected mayor?, Photos: MassCann's 2010 Freedom Rally, Review: Bangor artist Kenny Cole lights the 'Hellfire' at SPACE Gallery, More more >
  Topics: News Features , Politics, Conspiracy Theories, 9/11,  More more >
| More
15 Comments / Add Comment

Albury

I think it's time to investigate some of the bizarre and absurd claims made by Richard Gage, not the three WTC hi-rise collapses on 9/11, since they've already been thoroughly investigated by much more qualified, competent, and honest people. The NIST scientists and engineers were only able to time the top 18 stories, or 242', of the collapse of WTC 7's facade, and determined that it took 5.4 seconds, yet Gage and others in the 9/11 "truth movement" claim that the entire 610' collapse only took ~6.5 seconds. Did the other 368' fall in just over 1 second? How is he even able to give us a time to the nearest 1/10 of a second for the entire collapse when NIST couldn't because buildings in the foreground blocked the view of video cameras?
How can he claim that the towers nearly free fell when the loose, airborne debris from their upper stories was obviously falling much faster than the collapse zones, and began hitting the ground while at least 40 stories in each one were still intact? The North Tower was only down to the height of WTC 7 when debris from the upper stories first hit the ground. Was g miraculously increased on 9/11? They fell in ~15 and ~22 seconds respectively, nowhere near the ~9.25 seconds that free fall would have taken:

http://www.youtube.com/user/RKOwens4#p/u/40/qLShZOvxVe4

yet he begins every presentation with his near free-fall claim. He's also claimed that the dust clouds from the collapses were "pyroclastic," but there are no reports of anyone's skin being instantly peeled off, and he's claimed that the fires in WTC 7 were minor, totally contradicting these NYC eyewitnesses:

http://sites.google.com/site/wtc7lies/eyewitnessaccountsofwtc7fires
http://sites.google.com/site/wtc7lies/accountsofwtc7damage
http://sites.google.com/site/wtc7lies/eyewitnessaccountsofthewithdrawalfromwtc

How could his claim that 400,000 yards of concrete were turned to fine powder be true, when there was less than 100,000 yards of concrete above grade in both towers combined? Does he know how to turn 400,000 yards of concrete to fine powder with explosives without leveling NYC?
Has he ever seen a controlled demolition that left molten metal in the debris for months? Has he ever seen one that didn't leave even one explosively-cut column in the debris? Since he claims that explosives were planted in the core columns to start the collapses, and that it was done from elevator shafts, has he even looked a floor plan of the cores above the 78th floor sky lobby? There were only 6 regular elevators above there, plus a freight and 2 express elevators, and they were only near 6 of the 47 core columns. Several of those were in the paths of the planes, and the perimeter columns collapsed first, so he's not even making sense, especially considering the fact that 30 or more stories of core framing stood 15-25 seconds after each tower's main collapse was over.
We should investigate the nonsense coming from Richard Gage, as well as his "engineers."

http://forums.randi.org/showpost.php?p=3834688&postcount=12
Posted: September 08 2011 at 7:04 AM

Chris Sarns

The fire that supposedly started the collapse of WTC 7 had burned out over an hour earlier so it could not have caused the collapse as NIST claims.
For a complete analysis see:
http://truthphalanx.com/chris_sarns/


WTC 7 fell at free fall acceleration for about 100 feet. This can only occur when all the supporting structure is removed with some form of explosives.

NCSTAR 1A pg 45 [pdf pg 87]
In Stage 2, the north face descended at gravitational acceleration, as the buckled columns provided negligible* support to the upper portion of the north face. This free fall drop continued for approximately 8 stories or 32.0 m (105 ft)[3]
*Negligible: too small to be worth considering

NCSTAR 1A pg 55 [pdf pg 97]
The entire building above the buckled-column region then moved downward in a single unit, as observed,
Posted: September 08 2011 at 10:39 AM

Anonymous

Albury,
Rather than attacking someone who brings news you wish to disbelieve, maybe just examine the evidence Mr. Gage displays for all to see and critique. Engineers like myself have no time for theories. We deal in a world of reality by using hard empirical science, proven facts to ensure the products we bring to you actually work. If 1550 engineers told you there was something wrong with your house foundation, just maybe you ought to have a peak under that "scary" crawl space?
Posted: September 08 2011 at 10:43 AM

NavyNamVet

Albury works for the US Government. He has all of their fabricated data and calls Physics "bizarre and absurd" just like the main stream media that is owned by Zionist Jews. Who did 9/11? Who gained the most from the whole thing? The world Zionists that control our government and media. Stop the wars, end the Fed. Ron Paul 2012.
Posted: September 08 2011 at 11:50 AM

Brian Good

Albury is very confused. NIST acknowledges in their final report on WTC7 that for 2.25 seconds the building came in free fall. NIST lead investigator Shyam Sunder has stated that free fall can happen only when there is no structural support whatsoever. For the building to come down vertically and symmetrically, all supporting columns had to be eliminated simultaneously. That can not happen from fires.

Mr. Gage claims that the towers came down at near-freefall speed. Frame-by-frame analysis of the videos shows that the speed was 2/3 the acceleration of gravity. That is near freefall speed.

The term "pyroclastic" has been used by qualified geological authorities to describe the clouds of hot dust accompanying the collapses, so if Mr. Gage is in error in using that term, he is in good company.

Mr. Gage has claimed that 180,000 tons of concrete floors were turned to dust. He has not claimed that more yards, or more tons, of concrete were turned to dust than were present in the towers' floors.

The fact that molten metal is not a normal feature of normal controlled demolitions is irrelevant to a thermitic controlled demolition, which would produce molten steel and molten iron.

Mr. Albury's nonsense about elevator shafts shows that he doesn't know how to read blueprints, which are readily available at the AE911Truth dot org site.
Posted: September 08 2011 at 3:15 PM

Albury

Look at the lobby level plan above the 78th floor sky lobbies in either tower and count the number of working elevator shafts that are near any of the core columns, Brian. Watch the collapse videos and you'll see that 40 or more stories of tower framing in both of them stood for 15 or more seconds after the main collapses, so how did the secretly bombing cores cause the collapses? The tower floors were <4" thick, and 220 of them @ ~40,000 sq feet, allowing for penetrations, is <100,000 yards, so how did he get 4X that much?
236 of the 283 columns in each tower were in plain sight, and it's very obvious that explosives didn't cause them to fail. There was also no evidence of explosively-severed columns in the pile, and Jones's torch-cut columns don't count. Your "theory" is asinine.
Posted: September 08 2011 at 6:55 PM

Brian Good

I've looked at the plans, and I've counted the elevators, and I've seen that your belief that there are only 9 is delusional.

Richard Gage says that 180,000 tons of concrete floors were pulverized. That is true.

The failure of the lower core structure after it had survived the collapse of the outer floors is itself one of the great mysteries of 9/11. I'm not surprised that NIST punted on that and declined to explain it.

Your belief that the external columns were in plain sight is absurd. The external columns were hidden in an enormous dust cloud. You make up your facts.
Posted: September 08 2011 at 7:39 PM

Albury

So how many working elevator shafts were "really" at the impact areas of both towers, i.e. above the 78th floor sky lobbies, how many core columns were accessible from them, and why didn't the towers collapse inward if the cores were secretly bombed? The 236 perimeter columns were in plain sight prior to any downward movement in either tower, a number of them opposite the impact areas very clearly buckled inward to begin the collapses, and only your "truth movement" thinks explosives can be secretly hidden on columns in plain view. If your imaginary, fireproof, evidence-free explosives had triggered the collapses, the smoke would have been rapidly dispersed prior to the first movement of the upper floors, and it very clearly wasn't.
You not only make up facts, you ignore reality.
Posted: September 08 2011 at 8:17 PM

Brianu

Magnificent article -- Perhaps the fairest I've ever seen Thanks for calling attention to many of the very serious questions that serious people have.

Readers interested in learning of actual precedents for such a false flag attack should look into the Gulf of Tonkin incident (or lack thereof) which was only declassified as such a few years ago. For one suprisingly close to what occurred on 9/11/01 : look at the 'Operation Northwoods' document in which the Joint Chiefs of Staff signed off on crashing jets filled with American civilians by remote control. http://www.gwu.edu/~nsarchiv/news/20010430/
Posted: September 08 2011 at 8:52 PM

Brian Good

Albury, you ignore the fact that the perimeter columns were 14" tubular box columns, and had access ports at the base to allow them to be bolted to the column set below. Jonathan Cole demonstrated a thermite device that could cut 2/3 of the way through these box columns. See the youtube "Incendiary Experiments"

Also, thermite is fireproof. It's difficult to ignite. Generally ignition is by magnesium fuse.
Posted: September 08 2011 at 9:10 PM
1 | 2 | next >
Add Comment
HTML Prohibited

 Friends' Activity   Popular   Most Viewed 
[ 09/27 ]   Delusion  @ Paramount Theatre
[ 09/27 ]   South Pacific  @ Opera House
[ 09/27 ]   Sting! XI: Object Relations  @ Beehive
ARTICLES BY DEIRDRE FULTON
Share this entry with Delicious
  •   MAINE SNEAKER-MAKER COULD PROVIDE MILITARY FOOTWEAR  |  September 21, 2011
    As the only remaining manufacturer of athletic shoes in the United States — with three factories in Maine and two in Massachusetts — New Balance wants government assurance that military servicemembers wear American-made sneakers, not ones that are made overseas.
  •   PUT YOUR MONEY WHERE YOUR HOME IS  |  September 14, 2011
    FDIC statistics show that in Cumberland County, more than 80 percent of the market share of deposits is in TD Bank, Key Bank, or Bank of America.
  •   INSIDE THE 9/11 TRUTH MOVEMENT  |  September 07, 2011
    This week marks the tenth anniversary of the 9/11 attacks.
  •   COMMEMORATE 9/11 IN YOUR OWN WAY  |  September 07, 2011
    Regardless of what you believe about 9/11, it is a day that deserves contemplation and commemoration. Here are some local events before, after, and on the 10th anniversary that will get your blood, brain, or heartstrings moving.
  •   BLUES BEYOND PIE  |  August 31, 2011
    Here, a look at some blueberry characters and concerns.

 See all articles by: DEIRDRE FULTON

MOST POPULAR
RSS Feed of for the most popular articles
 Most Viewed   Most Emailed