Raising Hill

Hillary Clinton’s ‘aura of inevitability’ might hide her weaknesses — at least until the Republicans get their hands on her
By DAVID S. BERNSTEIN  |  September 12, 2007

MELTING THE ICE QUEEN: Clinton’s breaking down her negative image and winning over voters on the campaign trail.

Queen Hillary: Dynasties? Americans love ’em when Heather Locklear or Michael Jordan is involved. But will they embrace the Clintons?
Hillary Clinton took only two questions from the audience at the end of her 35-minute speech at the American Association of Retired Persons (AARP) conference in Boston this past Friday, and one of them hit her exactly where her Democratic opponents want her hit: Clinton’s disastrous, failed attempt to reform health-care coverage in her husband’s first term. Health care is the AARP’s No. 1 political issue these days, and aside from the Iraq War, probably the biggest topic among Democrats nationwide. Clinton’s botched attempt, in the view of many, set the health-care-reform agenda back 15 years.

But Clinton’s lengthy response to the question was the highlight of her talk, judging by comments afterward from a number of people in attendance. Clinton leaned her right elbow on the podium and cocked her head toward the audience, as she often does, conveying an informality and casualness that belies her public image of a cold, calculating ice queen. When she does this, she peppers her lines with “well” and “you know,” making her remarks seem off-the-cuff, even when she has delivered them — as she has answered this specific question — repeatedly on the campaign trail.

The 1993–94 reform effort revealed her political inexperience at the time, Clinton explained to the questioner. She did not know then how to maneuver bills through the jungle of Washington — terrain she has now spent 15 years mastering. Instead of anger at what she once called the “vast, right-wing conspiracy,” she displayed bemusement at her own naïveté; at her failure to realize that her plan to simplify the system, reduce costs, and increase individual freedom would be vilified as hopelessly complex, massively expensive, and Orwellian-ly restrictive.

Now that she knows how to negotiate the Washington process, Clinton continued, she was ready to take on forces like the drug companies and the insurance industry, who are prepared to spend hundreds of millions of dollars to protect the status quo against any change — and suddenly she had squared her shoulders and was speaking with crisp precision, turning her head left and right in the posture we have learned, in this teleprompter age, to identify with speechifying of great political import. The audience of roughly 3000 (another 3000 watched in spillover areas) went wild.

“She seems approachable,” Christine Young, a nurse from Salt Lake City, said after the AARP speech. “She seems like a warmer person than I expected.” Attendees from Maine, Connecticut, New York, and Kansas gave similar reviews.

This kind of lemonade-from-lemons trick is just killing her competitors for the Democratic Party presidential nomination, none of whom accepted invitations to speak at the AARP event. A Barack Obama staffer told the Phoenix this week of the campaign’s frustration that Clinton has been able to bill herself as the best candidate to drive the health-care-reform agenda, because of her experience screwing it up last time. (A more blunt Obama advisor bitched to the New Yorker on this point that “I’m sure George Bush learned how not to invade Iraq. Should we then trust him to invade Iran?”)

1  |  2  |  3  |  4  |  5  |   next >
Related: Pushing to replace Bush, Suffrage net city, Profile polling, More more >
  Topics: Talking Politics , Massachusetts, International Relations, Trade,  More more >
| More

Most Popular
Share this entry with Delicious
  •   MRS. WARREN GOES TO WASHINGTON  |  March 21, 2013
    Elizabeth Warren was the only senator on the Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions (HELP) Committee, aside from the chair and ranking minority, to show up at last Thursday's hearing on indexing the minimum wage to inflation.
  •   MARCH MADNESS  |  March 12, 2013
    It's no surprise that the coming weekend's Saint Patrick's Day celebrations have become politically charged, given the extraordinary convergence of electoral events visiting South Boston.
  •   LABOR'S LOVE LOST  |  March 08, 2013
    Steve Lynch is winning back much of the union support that left him in 2009.
  •   AFTER MARKEY, GET SET, GO  |  February 20, 2013
    It's a matter of political decorum: when an officeholder is running for higher office, you wait until the election has been won before publicly coveting the resulting vacancy.
    It wasn't just that Scott Brown announced he was not running in the special US Senate election — it was that it quickly became evident that he was not handing the job off to another Republican.

 See all articles by: DAVID S. BERNSTEIN