Shooting from the lip

By MARCO TRBOVICH  |  August 26, 2009

Kennedy-campaign staffers also confide that Teddy has probably pushed himself too hard in this early campaign swing, in an attempt to make up ground on Carter. This has resulted, they claim, in a weary candidate given to poor performances. Some of this may be true; for, although Ted Kennedy is not as glib as his well-crafted speeches have suggested over the years, neither is he as inarticulate as his stump performances have shown him over the past several weeks. "He was always so well-prepared," a friendly Massachusetts congressman mused. "But now he doesn't seem the polished, astute guy he's been. He almost looks preoccupied."

Yet the problem with Kennedy's campaign is not simply a case of road fatigue or reoccurring foot-in-mouth disease; nor can it be laid off to the distracted mien of a man who must understandably fear maniacal intent lurking around every corner. The more profound problem posed by his performance – particularly by his comments on Iran – is that it reinforces public doubt about his judgment. The fundamental question raised is this: with other people's well-being at stake, does Kennedy put his personal and political interests ahead of those in danger? It is the Chappaquiddick question bridging several continents.

Nor can Ted Kennedy afford to speak with a forked tongue about our posture of national unity toward Iran's threats when the most damaging perception about him is that he covered up after the accident at Dike Bridge by deceiving the public – which just happens to be what 80 percent of the Democratic public believes he did, including 60 percent of his own supporters. As one of Kennedy's congressional advocates complained, "It looks like he's gonna have to ride that Dike Bridge until Election Day."

Kennedy and his campaign are inadvertently highlighting these liabilities by making leadership the focus of his candidacy – an issue, if it can be called that, that redounds to questions of a character. By failing to frame the race as a competition between visions of the future, Kennedy is inviting invidious comparisons between Carter and himself as men rather than encouraging comparisons of their views toward the energy crisis and the world's changing economic order. Comparisons based on these issues could not help but prove beneficial to Kennedy, since Carter's announcement speech was as bereft of vision as his three years in office have been. (What it did contain was multiple use of the phrase, "That is the truth." Five times he used the line to tag and explanation of what America cannot do, obviously implying that telling the truth is not something Edward M. Kennedy can do.) "Kennedy's not providing a vision for the people," a staffer for a senator close to Kennedy complained. "He's not even providing a vision of the past."

< prev  1  |  2  |  3  |  4  |   next >
Related: Jimmy C. and Teddy K., After Ted, Strange bedfellows, More more >
  Topics: Flashbacks , Ted Kennedy, Ted Kennedy Memorial, Marco Trbovich,  More more >
| More


Most Popular
ARTICLES BY MARCO TRBOVICH
Share this entry with Delicious
  •   HARPER'S MAGAZINE, 1850-1980  |  June 26, 2010
    It seems but a moment ago that the sound of Dylan and Baez, the Beatles and the Stones reverberated through a world bent on catastrophe. Has it been almost 20 years?
  •   GOING MOBIL  |  August 26, 2009
    Washington – If ideology wasn't already dead in presidential politics, the plug was pulled on its support system last Monday, when the Kennedy campaign announced that its advertising and polling would be organized by Mobil Oil's vice-president of public affair, Herbert Schmertz.
  •   SHOOTING FROM THE LIP  |  August 26, 2009
    Washington – Edward M. Kennedy's presidential campaign has a serious problem, and the problem appears to be Edward M. Kennedy. During the week in which leadership was transformed from a word in the lexicon of his campaign rhetoric to a measurable reality, Kennedy succeeded in verbally vanishing himself to a political isolation.
  •   JIMMY C. AND TEDDY K.  |  August 26, 2009
    When the Camelot Caucus convenes in Faneuil Hall this Wednesday, the American presidency will once again become the trophy of a personality joust. In 1968 and '72, there was at least the issue of Vietnam to veil the overweaning ambitions of competing public men. But even that ambiguous nobility is lacking this year.

 See all articles by: MARCO TRBOVICH