Bay State's top lobbyists

By DAVID S. BERNSTEIN  |  February 8, 2010

In accordance with these shifting interests, there were winners and losers among the state's top lobbying firms. One big winner was O'Neill & Associates, which topped $2 million in fees, easily leading all its competitors. Their biggest-spending client was a California investment firm, Levine Leichtman, which paid more than $200,000 to lobby the treasurer's office for a piece of the state's investment business. (Seemingly all for naught: a spokesperson for Treasurer Timothy Cahill says it has placed no investments with Levine Leichtman.)

Another big winner of 2009 was Travaglini, Eisenberg and Kiley — thanks to the end of former Senate president Robert Travaglini's "grace period," after which he could, and did, officially begin lobbying state government, to the tune of more than a half-million in fees.

< prev  1  |  2  | 
Related: Alternatives abound, Instead of cuts: guts, Ready to rumble, More more >
  Topics: Talking Politics , Deval Patrick, Massachusetts Teachers Association, Political Lobbyists,  More more >
| More

Most Popular
Share this entry with Delicious
  •   MRS. WARREN GOES TO WASHINGTON  |  March 21, 2013
    Elizabeth Warren was the only senator on the Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions (HELP) Committee, aside from the chair and ranking minority, to show up at last Thursday's hearing on indexing the minimum wage to inflation.
  •   MARCH MADNESS  |  March 12, 2013
    It's no surprise that the coming weekend's Saint Patrick's Day celebrations have become politically charged, given the extraordinary convergence of electoral events visiting South Boston.
  •   LABOR'S LOVE LOST  |  March 08, 2013
    Steve Lynch is winning back much of the union support that left him in 2009.
  •   AFTER MARKEY, GET SET, GO  |  February 20, 2013
    It's a matter of political decorum: when an officeholder is running for higher office, you wait until the election has been won before publicly coveting the resulting vacancy.
    It wasn't just that Scott Brown announced he was not running in the special US Senate election — it was that it quickly became evident that he was not handing the job off to another Republican.

 See all articles by: DAVID S. BERNSTEIN