Exhibits worth a second look
by Jeffrey Gantz and Christopher Millis
1. Much ado in a little room.
With this little gem, the Isabella Stewart Gardner proved that a blockbuster show doesn't have to extend
through multiple zip codes. "Botticelli's Witness: Changing Styles in a
Changing Florence" served up just 10 Botticellis (six tempera and/or oil
paintings, four engravings) -- all of them owned by the Gardner, the MFA, or
Harvard, proving that Boston has almost as many Botticellis as the rest of the
US put together. The wall texts provided insights into Botticelli's Florence;
the small catalogue (reasonably priced at $15) offered glowing reproductions
and thought-provoking essays. This was the best one-room show of the year -- in
Boston and probably anywhere in the world.
the year in
| art |
classical |
dance |
fiction |
food |
jazz |
| local music |
local politics |
movies |
national politics |
| news |
non-fiction |
pop |
styles |
theater |
tv |
2. God made lefthanders so he could find a good man in a hurry.
The Museum of Science's "Leonardo da Vinci: Scientist, Inventor, Artist" was billed
as the largest Leonardo show ever. No, the museum didn't snag actual Leonardo
canvases (there are hardly 15 attested paintings in existence) -- it gave us
high-tech reproductions or originals attributed to Leonardo's workshop. So in
place of the real Mona Lisa -- which doesn't leave the Louvre, and which
in any case you'd have to view through plate glass, behind many rows of
tourists -- there was the Göteborg Mona Lisa, circa 1800, clearly a
copy and yet you could stand inches from it and see things even the original
wouldn't reveal. From a 10-minute video to a stage re-creation of Leonardo's
studio to endless interactive stations to the CD-ROM presentations, this was
the ultimate Renaissance show.
3. Wind from the East.
The landscapes of the Museum of Fine
Arts' "Tales from the Land of Dragons: 1000 Years of Chinese Painting"
delivered a millennial promise of repose, with some of the most delicate,
hallucinatory, and absorbing images of Chinese painting from between the third
and the 14th centuries to be seen anywhere in the world. And a companion show
saw Roy Lichtenstein reinvent himself, no mean accomplishment for a 74-year-old
painter. His "Landscapes in the Chinese Style" -- oversized renderings of
traditional and ancient Chinese landscapes complete with all of his signature
devices (the dot-matrix shadings that created entire mountain ranges, the
colors that could belong only to a post-nuclear age, the thick, black
comic-book borders) -- insisted that we step back, literally first, then
figuratively, and recognize our small, harmonious place in the surrounding
majesty.
4. Pucker up.
The Pucker Gallery offered three artists to
lighten the heart and gladden the soul. The 25 works in Venetian artist Pietro
Spica's first solo show in the US looked like the Peabody's glass flowers after
an inferno. For all their stained-glass luminosity, for all that his frames
suggested a postmodern Chagall, dreamy and beatified, there was a brooding,
knotted spirit that informed these compositions. Mark Davis's elegant,
freestanding, desktop-sized mobiles of sterling silver or gold leaf or painted
metal go through storytelling motions; one group offered magical galaxies, with
planets and moons and comets in perpetual interaction -- the universe as God's
playpen. And Gunnar Norrman's small, evanescent pencil drawings and engravings
of trees and gardens, shorelines and buildings (usually those of Malmö,
Sweden, where he lives), conveyed a sense of timeless tranquility.
5. So where's his MacArthur genius grant?
As one of the seers of Cubism, Pablo Picasso was to the visual arts what Stravinsky and
Schoenberg were to music and Joyce was to fiction. The Museum of Fine Arts
described its "Picasso: The Early Years, 1892-1906" as "the most comprehensive
exhibition of the artist's formative years ever undertaken." In fact it was a
comprehensive record of Picasso in search of Picasso, before he became PICASSO.
The Blue Period made a much more impressive statement than the Rose Period --
perhaps because Les saltimbanques was absent, perhaps because Picasso's
Rose Period wasn't quite the equal of the Blue. In any case, "The Early Years"
didn't do much more than show us most of Picasso's early work. Anybody have a
problem with that?
6. Face to face.
The Photographic Resource Center's "Facing
Death: Portraits from Cambodia's Killing Fields" was a shocker on the order of
reading The Diary of Anne Frank for the first time. The images of 50 or
so children and women, men and boys and girls, were taken by one of the
photographers for the Khmer Rouge, a record of people who were about to be
transported to a field outside of Phnom Penh to dig their own graves before
being butchered. The show confronted us with the last, knowing, revealing faces
of souls on the brink of departure. For all their desperation, the expressions
were open, revealing, unguarded. And devastating.
7. Lafayette . . . go home. The Worcester Art
Museum's "American Impressionism: Paintings of Promise" delivered a visual
record of America growing up -- it was like a picture album of our youth, when
we were indeed full of hope, of promise. This small (48 works in all) show,
which also celebrated the WAM's 100th birthday, demonstrated that while Boston
collectors were gobbling up French Impressionist canvases, Worcesterites, being
more provincial, gravitated toward the American variety. But don't assume
Worcester came off second best. "Paintings of Promise" proved that the finest
of F.W. Benson and Childe Hassam can stand frame to frame with their French
cousins.
8. Moving experience. Pat Keck's exhibit of renegade sculptures at the
Genovese/Sullivan Gallery was one of those shows your kids who become
art-history majors will read about. Her meticulous wooden marionettes range in
size from a few inches to 15 feet, and she mechanically manipulates their limbs
and their environments so that each piece suggests a different circus act of
the mind. To see them once was to remember them forever.
9. Sit on it.
Furniture as art? Three Newbury Street spaces -- Gallery
Naga, MacKeen Gallery, and the Society of Arts and Crafts -- made believers of
us. Items like Jere Osgood's austere desk (it looked like a cross between a
cathedral and an athlete), John Dunnigan's plain Shaker hymn of a "Cabinet for
William Morris," and David Ebner's six-foot coat rack in the shape of a
scallion even tempted us to take out a bank loan.
10. Makes the whole world kin.
Is art just oil and canvas?
Or can we make room for those whose mátier is the drafting table? The Art
Institute of Boston's "Edward Sorel: A Drawing Retrospective" and his new book,
Unauthorized Portraits, made an unimpeachable case for caricaturists.
Whether it's his "First Encounters" series (Jean Renoir and Erich von Stroheim,
Marlon Brando and Tennessee Williams, Colette and Truman Capote, Sigmund Freud
and Gustav Mahler), his "Footnotes to History" (Joe DiMaggio watching Marilyn
shoot the subway-grate scene of The Seven Year Itch), his "Movie
Classics" (Casablanca was a special classic), or, in the Tina Brown era,
those innumerable pointed New Yorker covers, Sorel's cartoons are oddly
generous and fair, and not in the phony Dan Rather-esque way of pretending
balance. Call him our era's O. Henry -- his is the dangerous art of telling the
truth.