Flying solo
Boston's pilot schools raise an interesting question: how committed is this
city to fixing education, really?
Education by Yvonne Abraham
Fifteen third-graders, bundled up against the cold, are playing freeze tag
outside the Young Achievers Academy, in Mission Hill. The game doesn't last
long: the blacktop that passes for the school's playground is only slightly
bigger than the average suburban driveway, and the kids can't run far. In less
than 10 minutes, all but a few of them are standing still, loudly egging the
others on, their breath visible. They might have played in the basement
cafeteria, but the kids from Mission Grammar, the Catholic school from which
Young Achievers leases classroom space, are already down there, playing
basketball. Big silver trash cans, propped up on furniture, serve as hoops.
Space is tight throughout the school: the girls have a single bathroom, also
shared with Mission Grammar, and there's only one working washbasin in it. Next
year, Young Achievers will add another grade (as it has done in each of the
last two years), and the school will need to negotiate to rent more classrooms.
And even if they get those extra rooms, the whole school might be homeless next
year anyway, when its lease is up.
And yet parents are clamoring to get their kids in here: the waiting list for
Young Achievers is 250 names long. The academy is a pilot school, one of 11
innovative schools authorized by the school department, the school committee,
and the Boston Teachers' Union since the spring of 1994 in the interest of
bringing change to the deteriorating Boston public school system. Free of most
union and district rules, the pilot schools can choose their own teachers and
set their own hours. They were designed to find new ways of educating, to
pioneer models that could be adopted by the entire system.
But despite the good work the pilot schools are doing, the city has not backed
them up. They are plagued by facilities problems. They must battle daily for
the autonomy they were promised. And the rest of the school system isn't taking
up the lessons they can provide: lessons on reconfiguring the school day, on
nurturing enthusiasm among teachers, on getting through to kids beyond the
reach of traditional approaches. The city is in danger of squandering the hope
the pilot schools offer, and of ducking the radical change they represent.
But the school system needs that change, and fast. Most of this city's 123
schools have been consistently shortchanging their students for more than a
decade. Test scores are alarmingly low, truancy and dropout rates alarmingly
high. Kids have been shunted from one grade to the next regardless of whether
they are qualified. Parents who can afford the choice take their kids out of
the public school system -- or out of the city altogether -- when the students
reach middle-school age.
Both Mayor Thomas Menino and Schools Superintendent Thomas Payzant have
promised action, and they've promised it soon. Every year without reform sends
another class of disastrously unprepared kids into the real world: there's no
time for modest, incremental change. The clock is ticking.
Since pilot schools began three years ago, they have been helping a wide range
of students, from gifted kids to those the system had given up on. The schools
offer longer days and smaller classes, specializations in science or performing
arts, committed teachers and involved parents. Where test scores are available,
they're good. Attendance and enthusiasm at the pilots are higher than in most
schools.
But each one has a long waiting list: pilot schools serve only 1500 of
Boston's 65,000 students. The rest must make do with schools of varying
quality. Some are every bit as good as the pilot schools; most don't even come
close. So hundreds of parents, even some who could choose private schools, are
hankering to get their kids into the pilots. The experiment is working. Which
makes it all the more puzzling that the city hasn't let more people in on it.
Yvonne Abraham can be reached at yabraham[a]phx.com.