In a Bind

By DAVID S. BERNSTEIN  |  October 23, 2012

And that might be the real lesson some see in the binder story. Romney told it — and twisted it to take the credit — not because he in fact sees the importance of having women in powerful positions, but because, for political reasons, he wanted to convince women that he does. In almost the same breath, Romney cited his concern that businesses have flexible hours for women who need to get home to cook dinner for their children.

That reveals a lot, Romney's 2002 opponent, Shannon O'Brien, says. "His comments in the debate indicate that qualified female candidates were window dressing, rather than part of his thinking," she says. "He's painting an image of himself as a knight in shining armor, who is going to pluck women out of obscurity and let them work for him — and get home to cook dinner."


< prev  1  |  2  | 
Related: Mitt's Charlie Card, Romney has capitulated utterly to the gun fetishists — as the body count keeps rising, At its convention, the GOP tries to clean up for company, More more >
  Topics: Talking Politics , Mitt Romney, Politics, Election 2012,  More more >
| More

Most Popular
Share this entry with Delicious
  •   MRS. WARREN GOES TO WASHINGTON  |  March 21, 2013
    Elizabeth Warren was the only senator on the Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions (HELP) Committee, aside from the chair and ranking minority, to show up at last Thursday's hearing on indexing the minimum wage to inflation.
  •   MARCH MADNESS  |  March 12, 2013
    It's no surprise that the coming weekend's Saint Patrick's Day celebrations have become politically charged, given the extraordinary convergence of electoral events visiting South Boston.
  •   LABOR'S LOVE LOST  |  March 08, 2013
    Steve Lynch is winning back much of the union support that left him in 2009.
  •   AFTER MARKEY, GET SET, GO  |  February 20, 2013
    It's a matter of political decorum: when an officeholder is running for higher office, you wait until the election has been won before publicly coveting the resulting vacancy.
    It wasn't just that Scott Brown announced he was not running in the special US Senate election — it was that it quickly became evident that he was not handing the job off to another Republican.

 See all articles by: DAVID S. BERNSTEIN