Gore isn’t running because he couldn’t raise the money
BY SETH GITELL
TUESDAY, DECEMBER 17, 2002 – Everybody seems to be missing the point about Vice President Al Gore’s decision not to run for president. Anna Quindlen was on with Don Imus this morning giving Gore credit for making a relatively courageous decision. Others, such as Opinion Journal’s James Taranto suggested Gore’s decision represented a degree of self-awareness.
My take is simple. Gore couldn’t raise the money he needed to run the kind of presidential campaign he’d want to run. Gore’s no Ralph Nader or Howard Dean, both of whom can mount campaigns off of fumes. Gore needs money.
With Massachusetts Senator John Kerry already having raised more than $3 million and with former Democratic National Committee chairman Steve Grossman backing Howard Dean, along with New York Senator Hillary Clinton’s signals that she wouldn’t support Gore, it should have been obvious: Gore couldn’t fund his campaign.
What does this say about our money-laden political system? This time it worked. For as much as we all lament and rail against the presence of money in politics – how depressing was it that both Gore and George W. Bush were their party’s candidates in 2000 in large part because each won the "money primary" -- here’s a case where money helped a potential candidate make a decision he should have been able to make on his own. For weeks since mid-November Gore has been on a massive publicity campaign, even appearing on Comedy Central’s The Daily Show and NBC’s Saturday Night Live. Throughout the tour, Gore failed to catch on. His performance reminded me of the ghost of Jacob Marley in Charles Dickens’ A Christmas Carol. Despite Gore’s better than expected performance – refusing to leave the West Wing’s Oval Office in a skit with Martin Sheen – Gore’s campaign wasn’t going anywhere. It took the hard reality of donors giving Gore the cold shoulder to make him see this.
Let’s call it a case of the right thing happening for the wrong reasons. Money is the dominant force in presidential politics, and sometimes it influences candidates for the better.
What do you think? Send an e-mail to letters[a]phx.com.
Issue Date: December 17, 2002
"Today's Jolt" archives: 2002 2001
Back to the News and Features table of contents.