Mitt bulks up

Up to Old Tricks Dept.
By DAVID S. BERNSTEIN  |  April 18, 2012


If there's one thing the Mitt Romney team excels at, it's manipulating campaign-finance rules. Through intertwined state party committees, joint fundraising, "Super PACs," and other maneuvers, they have made a series of clever moves over the years to maximize the amount of money Romney's wealthy donors could put to use for his benefit.

The team has now found another new technique — one that will allow the Romney campaign to direct large sums of money, as needed, to state GOP committees in battleground states.

This week, the Romney campaign and the Republican National Committee (RNC) established a joint-fundraising account, "Romney Victory Inc." The idea is that donors can write one big check to the joint account, which can then be divvied up between Romney's campaign committee and the RNC.

Nothing especially unique about that. But the paperwork filed with the Federal Election Committee shows that several other committees are included in the arrangement — including the Massachusetts Republican State Congressional Committee, as well as the Idaho Republican Party, the Oklahoma Leadership Council, and the Vermont Federal Elections Committee.

These are the federal fundraising committees of those state parties. As you may have noticed, none of those four states taking part in this scheme are expected to be at all competitive in the presidential race. So why would the Romney campaign and the RNC raise money for them?

The answer: so they can re-direct the money to states that need it.

Romney campaign spokesperson Andrea Saul responded to my inquiry by e-mail, explaining: "The joint fundraising committee includes state parties that are permitted by federal election law to make unlimited federal dollar transfers to the battleground state parties."

This is essentially correct. Federal law does not limit transfers from federal party committees — like the Massachusetts Republican State Congressional Committee — to state party committees. State laws, however, do govern the amounts — but it so happens that most of the anticipated "battleground states" in the 2012 presidential election effectively allow unlimited transfers of this type.

So, these four accounts will receive contributions and funnel them, in bulk, to the state GOP committees in Florida, Ohio, Nevada, Missouri, New Hampshire, or wherever the money might prove useful.

This arrangement will greatly expand the amount Romney can direct for use in this campaign, essentially doubling it in one swipe. He has a large group of donors willing to give hefty sums, but has so far proven unable to raise significant funds from low-dollar contributors. His wealthy donors will now be able to write a $75,000 check, or $150,000 per couple.

Related: Most popular articles of 2009, Bad news for Mitt?, Palin's magic bus ride just might save Romney -- and run over Obama, More more >
  Topics: This Just In , Mitt Romney, Politics, Republican National Committee,  More more >
| More

Most Popular
Share this entry with Delicious
  •   MRS. WARREN GOES TO WASHINGTON  |  March 21, 2013
    Elizabeth Warren was the only senator on the Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions (HELP) Committee, aside from the chair and ranking minority, to show up at last Thursday's hearing on indexing the minimum wage to inflation.
  •   MARCH MADNESS  |  March 12, 2013
    It's no surprise that the coming weekend's Saint Patrick's Day celebrations have become politically charged, given the extraordinary convergence of electoral events visiting South Boston.
  •   LABOR'S LOVE LOST  |  March 08, 2013
    Steve Lynch is winning back much of the union support that left him in 2009.
  •   AFTER MARKEY, GET SET, GO  |  February 20, 2013
    It's a matter of political decorum: when an officeholder is running for higher office, you wait until the election has been won before publicly coveting the resulting vacancy.
    It wasn't just that Scott Brown announced he was not running in the special US Senate election — it was that it quickly became evident that he was not handing the job off to another Republican.

 See all articles by: DAVID S. BERNSTEIN