
Rudy Giuliani |
A week after Bishop Thomas J. Tobin gained national attention for his condemnation of Rudy Giuliani’s position on abortion, one has to wonder what happens next.
Will Tobin tighten the net and try to force campaign volunteers to divorce themselves from Rudy? Will he argue that supporters cannot remain Catholics if they work for Giuliani’s election? Will he banish them from the communion rail for ignoring his dicta on abortion?
During his visit to Rhode Island, Giuliani dodged queries about Tobin, preferring to embrace the supporters who flocked, checkbooks ready, to subsidize his Republican presidential bid. Tobin, meanwhile, got more mileage from his message, thanks to the New Hampshire lightning bolt that dramatically punctuated his condemnation of Giuliani’s position.
The overwhelmingly anti-choice Host Committee for the local Giuliani fete — including Senate Minority Leader Dennis Algiere (R-Westerly); former Lieutenant Governor Bernard Jackvony; former Cranston Mayor Steve Laffey; and former Republican State Party chairwoman Patricia Morgan — seemed oblivious to the bishop’s warnings. Perhaps strident pro-lifer Laffey ought to practice obedience, capitulate to his bishop and encourage other Catholic followers of Giuliani to follow.
Tobin, meanwhile, ought to worry about what’s morally wrong at One Cathedral Square.
Since his consecration as bishop, some lawyers representing clients alleging sexual abuse by priests say they have been ignored when they came forward under the so-called Pastoral Program initiated in 2005 by former Bishop Robert E. Mulvey. About 50 cases were processed under Mulvey’s Pastoral Program, providing counseling for the victims and about $2 million in cash settlements. (The original settlements of at least another 38 victims, from one legal group alone, cost the diocese under Mulvey $14.25 million, and there were other settlements after that.)
Why does a bishop, who is so fixated on what is morally and dogmatically acceptable concerning a woman’s pregnancy, ignore what is moral and dogmatically acceptable on the question of sexual abuse of children by priests?
The Catholic Church and the Diocese of Providence have always been arbitrary in defining who is moral and Catholic, and who is not.
Heavy contributors to Catholic Charities are divorced and remarried with ease while their blue-collar equivalents are banished from the pews. The late Mafia kingpin Raymond L.S. Patriarca is given full burial privileges in a Catholic cemetery, while a beloved Catholic priest who chose suicide is stripped of the reverend title in his obituary.
Loving relatives are denied the chance to be witnesses at their loved ones’ weddings, baptisms, or confirmations because of one priest’s judgment that they are not worthy. In some cases, that same priest is later defrocked for sexual abuse of young people.
Giuliani, a former seminarian, is twice divorced and remarried, a public philanderer and arguably a political slut (Giuliani nominated — and then withdrew — his friend Bernard Kerik, an unscrupulous libertine, for the nation’s top security job). Why anyone even considers him a Catholic at this point may be the eighth glorious mystery.
Critics charge that the Catholic Church, which often adopts the Christian symbol of the fish, may be deteriorating morally. Mr. Patriarca could have told Tobin that the fish still rots from the top down.
Related:
Judging the Judge, Who said Freddy’s dead?, The shape of things to come, More
- Judging the Judge
After reading Sunday’s front page BeloJo story, “Support for R.I. Judge not unanimous,” your superior correspondents have to suspect that everything — absolutely everything — is thoroughly politicized.
- Who said Freddy’s dead?
The Republican race is coming into focus. Well, sort of.
- The shape of things to come
The Democratic front-runners and the Republican establishment will be making critical decisions in the coming weeks that will shape the course of the race.
- Can Mitt win?
To understand why Mitt Romney’s dream of capturing the Republican presidential nomination is not far-fetched, you first have to understand what Rudy Giuliani is doing — or rather, not doing.
- Supposed clerical reformer proves to be a control freak
The ProJo ’s front page on February 15 delivered a one-two punch to Rhode Island Roman Catholics.
- Bishop’s puzzlement on pro-choice Catholics is misplaced
Dogma doesn’t pay the rent, feed a hungry child, or pay for medicine; nor do arrogance, hypocrisy, or feigned bewilderment.
- Drinan’s spirit
The recent death of Father Robert Drinan offers not only an opportunity to remember and celebrate his principled political spirit, but also cause to recollect the sorry state of affairs that led to his election.
- The problem with liberals' dislike of Rick Warren
The need to be consistent in the defense of the rights of all in our country — even those whose views we may find abhorrent.
- Romney's greatest gaffes - 'tar baby' update
Even by Mitt Romney’s gaffe-tastic standards, this was a bad one.
- Feeding the rabid right
Mitt Romney’s attempt to follow George W. Bush’s formula to the Republican presidential nomination has hit a snag.
- Sexual politics
Eve Ensler’s play is as much a manifesto as a dramatic production, not so much agitprop but an animated display of wordy protest signs condemning violence against women.
- Less

Topics:
This Just In
, Elections and Voting, Politics, U.S. Politics, More
, Elections and Voting, Politics, U.S. Politics, U.S. Presidential Election, Culture and Lifestyle, Religion, Christianity, Crime, Rudolph Giuliani, Bernard Kerik, Less