The Cultural Caucus's big gamble

Formed to be a savior of the arts in the Bay State, a political coalition is playing high-stakes poker by putting casinos in its sights
By DAVID S. BERNSTEIN  |  March 3, 2010

The recently formed Cultural Caucus, a loose, formal coalition comprising a dozen arts-friendly state legislators, appears poised to christen its political life by inserting itself into what could be the most intense statewide political battle of the spring legislative session: the move to allow casino gambling in Massachusetts.

The threat that gaming poses to arts and culture may not seem obvious, but that's exactly why the arts community is asking the caucus to be its white knight.

Arts advocates are convinced that gambling, whether in the form of "resort-style" casinos or race-track slot parlors, will cut directly into the money that households spend on the arts. Their fear is that a green light for gambling will be the death knell for performing-arts centers and organizations, both large and small, which are already suffering financially.

One reason for the fears of theater owners in particular is that state casinos might include performance arenas, which in their opinion will provide unfair competition — unfair because, for the casinos, entertainment is a loss leader to bring people onto the premises to gamble. Casinos can thus offer more money to performers, and charge less to patrons, than standalone performance centers can.

For a good idea of what kind of model arts organizations here in Massachusetts will be up against, one need look only as far south as Connecticut, where the Mohegan Sun and Foxwoods casinos have become entertainment meccas, each with several theaters presenting acts ranging from stand-up comics, such as Jerry Seinfeld, to musicians, such as Jay-Z, who plays Mohegan Sun this Saturday.

The bottom line, say arts advocates, is that existing venues will be affected, as will the vibrant scene they provide for cities and towns from the Berkshires to Cape Cod.

Members of the Cultural Caucus say they were not thinking of casinos when they gathered a month ago for their first meeting. Together with key players like the Massachusetts Cultural Council (MCC) and the Boston Foundation, the lawmakers were motivated by concern over state budget reductions, which has seen cultural funding drop from close to $20 million in 1998 to less than $10 million this year. A caucus, they thought, could better make the case for viewing arts as an investment in the "creative economy."

There was also, according to some, concern about waning influence on Beacon Hill. The arts community recently lost an effective lobbyist, Dan Hunter, who left the Massachusetts Advocates for the Arts, Sciences, and Humanities (MAASH) in December to form a consulting business. And the Joint Committee on Tourism, Arts, and Cultural Development (many of whose members are also in the new caucus), once headed by more powerful lawmakers, is newly co-chaired this session by first-term senator Sonia Chang-Díaz and third-term representative John Keenan.

Although funding was their primary focus, the people behind the caucus were prepared to think bigger.

"Certainly funding is important, but it is important for us to think creatively," says Chang-Díaz of Jamaica Plain, who is also co-chairing the caucus. She hopes the caucus members can serve as a watchdog to find the potential positive or negative impacts to arts and culture hidden within the 6000-plus bills filed on Beacon Hill each year.

1  |  2  |  3  |   next >
Related: Ready to rumble, Capuano for Senate, Mean everything to nothing, More more >
  Topics: Talking Politics , Massachusetts, Massachusetts Cultural Council, Gambling,  More more >
| More

Most Popular
Share this entry with Delicious
  •   MRS. WARREN GOES TO WASHINGTON  |  March 21, 2013
    Elizabeth Warren was the only senator on the Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions (HELP) Committee, aside from the chair and ranking minority, to show up at last Thursday's hearing on indexing the minimum wage to inflation.
  •   MARCH MADNESS  |  March 12, 2013
    It's no surprise that the coming weekend's Saint Patrick's Day celebrations have become politically charged, given the extraordinary convergence of electoral events visiting South Boston.
  •   LABOR'S LOVE LOST  |  March 08, 2013
    Steve Lynch is winning back much of the union support that left him in 2009.
  •   AFTER MARKEY, GET SET, GO  |  February 20, 2013
    It's a matter of political decorum: when an officeholder is running for higher office, you wait until the election has been won before publicly coveting the resulting vacancy.
    It wasn't just that Scott Brown announced he was not running in the special US Senate election — it was that it quickly became evident that he was not handing the job off to another Republican.

 See all articles by: DAVID S. BERNSTEIN