Powered by Google
Home
Listings
Editors' Picks
News
Music
Movies
Food
Life
Arts + Books
Rec Room
Moonsigns
- - - - - - - - - - - -
Personals
Adult Personals
Classifieds
Adult Classifieds
- - - - - - - - - - - -
stuff@night
FNX Radio
Band Guide
MassWeb Printing
- - - - - - - - - - - -
About Us
Contact Us
Advertise With Us
Work For Us
Newsletter
RSS Feeds
- - - - - - - - - - - -
Webmaster
Archives



sponsored links
- - - - - - - - - - - - -
PassionShop.com
Sex Toys - Adult  DVDs - Sexy  Lingerie


   
  E-Mail This Article to a Friend

The Deval Patrick Show
Massachusetts has another gubernatorial prospect. Is he for real?
BY ADAM REILLY

DEVAL PATRICK had a busy week. On Monday, January 17 ó Martin Luther King Jr. Day ó readers of the Boston Globe learned that Patrick might run for governor in 2006. One day later, Patrick sat down with Emily Rooney, host of WGBH-TVís Greater Boston, to discuss his political future. On Friday morning, Bob Oakes of WBUR conducted a lengthy interview with Patrick during prime commuting time. Things came full circle on Saturday, when the Globe reported that none other than Bill Clinton had offered to advise Patrick as he ponders a run. It was a truly impressive multimedia barrage ó but through it all, one nagging question lingered:

Whoís Deval Patrick?

If Patrickís sudden arrival as a possible candidate surprised the general public, they werenít alone. Plenty of local Democratic insiders seemed befuddled as well. "I wouldnít know Deval Patrick if I went home tonight and he was sitting in my kitchen," said one. Another said Patrick had "absolutely not been on my radar" as a potential candidate. "I was not aware of him at all as someone whoíd jump in the race," said a third. "I donít know him that well," remarked a fourth. "In fact, I donít think Iíve ever met him."

Thanks to the recent spate of coverage, the broad contours of Patrickís life slowly are coming into focus. Patrick, who is African-American, grew up in poverty on Chicagoís South Side. He came to Massachusetts after winning a scholarship to Milton Academy, and attended Harvard College and Harvard Law School. In 1994, at the age of 37, he joined the Clinton administration, where he served as assistant attorney general for civil rights. After leaving that post in 1997, he held two high-paying corporate jobs, as general counsel for Texaco and then for Coca-Cola. Patrick is 48; he and his wife, Diane, an attorney at Ropes & Gray, live in Milton and have two daughters.

At this point, however, Massachusetts still has an extremely limited sense of who Patrick is and whatís driving his potential candidacy. Which makes it hard to take seriously the idea ó first floated by Dan Payne, the veteran Democratic media consultant whoís advising Patrick ó that he could be our answer to Barack Obama, the newly elected US senator from Illinois. Given Patrickís middling public debut ó and considering that heís never run for elected office before ó this suggestion seems dangerously premature. But is it?

PATRICKíS MEDIA appearances last week had something of a not-ready-for-prime-time feel. Take his appearance on Greater Boston. Confronted with the one question he should have known was coming ó why are you thinking about running for governor? ó Patrick declared his "very deep, soft feeling" for Massachusetts. By the time of his WBUR interview, Patrick had (wisely) jettisoned this vaguely creepy explanation; instead, he spoke of his abiding "soft spot" for the state. It was an improvement, but it still gave an indulgent, wishy-washy cast to Patrickís hypothetical candidacy.

Then there was the strange letter Patrick sent to prospective supporters, in which eloquent tributes to Massachusetts and to the role of government were coupled with oddly plaintive requests for help. ("Tell me your thoughts not just about the political calculations, but about how I should be thinking about and learning about what people need and how an enlightened, engaged governor could help," Patrick wrote. "... Especially ask your kids what they need in a governor and pass that thinking on.") To some political veterans, it all seemed ridiculously half-baked. "To send out letters asking five-year-old kids what they think about you running for governor? Itís stupid!" complains one Democrat. "You donít know why youíre going to run? Donít run." "If you want to run for governor," adds Scott Ferson, a political consultant with the Liberty Square Group, "itís nice to know why you want to run, instead of saying youíre going to figure it out."

Yet earlier this week, as Patrick discussed his quasi-candidacy over breakfast at the Omni Parker House, he was generally upbeat. "Iíve had hundreds of e-mail messages and phone calls with encouragement and support," he said. "Iíve started receiving money. Iíve had calls from Democratic activists, from people who are not very involved in politics, from Republicans, from self-declared independents. Iíve had offers to do fundraisers and friend-raisers all around this area, in the western part of the state, in New York and Washington, DC, and Atlanta and Chicago and St. Louis and Los Angeles and San Francisco. On the whole, itís been very heartening." (Given a recent development in his family, he adds, it also has been somewhat overwhelming: his mother, Emily, died early on the morning of January 18.)

Patrick also defended his collaborative (or, put less kindly, his undirected) approach to deciding whether to run ó and, in the process, took a nasty swipe at Mitt Romney. "What Iím trying to find is whether what I offer is what people need," he said. "If thereís a completely different idea ó if the electorate were to say, ĎWe need somebody who really believes that the most vulnerable are vulnerable through some fault of their own, and the collective We ó which includes the government, and which the government ought to reflect ó has absolutely no responsibility for and ought to take no responsibility for the most vulnerable citizens,í then Iím not the guy. Thatís not who I am.

"I take the point about the five-year-olds," Patrick added. "Okay, donít talk to your five-year-old. Fine. But I bet your 14-year-old has a point of view. Your 14-year-old is at a point where theyíre trying to choose between the sort of feigned insouciance that they think sophistication is, and whether theyíre going to hold on to some of the idealism which is a part of youth. And itís up to adults to invite and challenge young people to think about more than themselves ó to see their stake not just in their own dreams, but in their neighborís dreams. You can trivialize any gesture that people make to try to offer a way for people to be heard, and there are a lot of examples of that in public life. I think itís time to turn that around."

page 1  page 2 

Issue Date: January 28 - February 3, 2005
Back to the News & Features table of contents
  E-Mail This Article to a Friend
 









about the phoenix |  advertising info |  Webmaster |  work for us
Copyright © 2005 Phoenix Media/Communications Group